15/08/2026
Central Park and Dust control at the Avant and Miller sites:
I’ve previously commented on other posts about the proposed location of Central Park and the associated public open space, particularly because there had been concerns that the park was not going to be completed.
Almost two weeks ago, I met with the Council’s Principal Planning Officer on site early on a Monday morning to clarify the proposed location, as it appeared to differ from what had been discussed during a previous site visit with Avant.
The site location plan and marked-up version attached (yellow zigzag) show the proposed location of Central Park. Essentially, it sits between Avant’s two development phases, widening out towards the sports pitches, with a footpath running through to the community building.
The design and routing of the access footpath from George Lees Avenue and William Venables Drive has still to be agreed, as the initial proposals were considered unsuitable for a number of reasons.
Construction dust
Although the visit was primarily focused on Central Park, I also separately raised the ongoing issue of unacceptable dust plumes being created by construction equipment with the site managers responsible for both sides of the Miller developments at Thomas Blakemore Way and George Lees Avenue, as well as the Avant site manager.
Following a number of previous complaints, and actions agreed with the Council’s Highways Engineers to minimise dust as far as reasonably practicable given the hot and dry conditions, it was disappointing to see large plumes of dust still being generated despite those agreed measures being expected to be implemented continuously.
The Avant site was not an issue. However, I expressed concern that areas on both sides of the Miller site had not been adequately wetted before work commenced that Monday morning. Given the previous concerns and agreed actions, this was unacceptable and, in my view, demonstrated a reactive rather than proactive approach to managing the problem.
Both site managers responded immediately by diverting water bowsers to the affected areas. I also raised my concerns directly with the Miller Contracts Manager, who has always responded positively to issues I have previously raised, as well as with the Council’s Highways Engineers and Planning Enforcement, who have been monitoring compliance.
It is important to note that failure to adequately implement dust-control measures could ultimately result in a stop order being issued, which would have serious implications, as construction could potentially be prevented for 28 days.
A number of actions have subsequently been agreed:
• All active areas of the site will be continuously wetted prior to construction activity.
• Roads will be swept frequently, but wetted beforehand, as simply sweeping dry roads was actually creating additional dust.
• A dust-monitoring device, costing around £10,000, will be purchased and installed on an appropriate lamppost.
• The Council’s Highways Engineers will regularly monitor the site to ensure compliance.
Hopefully, these measures will help minimise the dust problems that have been reported and, most importantly, allow residents to enjoy their homes and the surrounding environment without having to deal with excessive dust.
Apologies for adding the dust issue to this post, but given the concerns raised by residents and the expectation that action needed to be urgently taken, I thought it was important to provide an update.