01/08/2026
Pahiatua District Court.
(By Telegraph)
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/HAST19040519.2.11
Bibliographic details
Hastings Standard, Volume VIII, Issue 4235, 19 May 1904, Page 3
Word count
93
Pahiatua, May l9 1904
At a sitting of the District Court, in the case of Dampney Bros, versus McAllistar, an action for slander, council on defendant's behalf apologised, and agreed to pay costs, which was accepted. Appeals by Farrelly and Gregory against the decision of the Stipendiary Magistrate in fining them for cutting a dam were allowed. Within costs. This case of Fisk v. Farreily, a claim for £490 alleged damage to plaintiffs land through defendant cutting a dam and thus flooding plaintiff's property is now being heard lasted all Wednesday and Thursday.
20 May 1904
Woodville Examiner, Volume XX, Issue 3697, 20 May 1904, Page 2:
Pahiatua, This day. The case is still proceeding and is likely to last some little time yet.
23 May 1904
Woodville Examiner, Volume XX, Issue 3698, 23 May 1904, Page 2:
The case of Fisk v, Farrelly aud Gregory, a claim for .£490 for alleged damage to the plaintiff’s land, through defendants damaging a dam, was concluded in the Pahiatua District Court on Friday night after occupying the attention of the Court for three days. The jury returned a verdict for the defendants, which carries costs.
Pahiatua District Court. (By Telegrapn.j Pahiatua, Mayl9 At a sitting of the District Court, in the case ol Dampney Bros, versus McAllistar, an action for slander, council on defendant's behalf apologised, ami agreed to pay costs, which was accepted. Appeals by Far relly aivl Gregory against the dec...