Comments
According to Chapter 35:1 Town & Country Planning Act
Is POS Town & Country accepting new Drawing Submission at this point in time?
Is Town and Country North Central Division open for business,or under Covid Measures still?
Mr Gary Griffith, please clarify what is a covid party. Is it that there must be more than 4 in attendance, or must there be Venezes in the dance ?
With only 1 or 2 in on location, there is definitely no gathering, but what about the loud music? Is it ok to disturb the peace once there is no crowd? You’re the boss so please clarify.
The police chief of all persons, must at least be more informed on this topic of noise than his officers.
(1) If a new born is in his crib, is it an offense to stay from next door and pelt rocks, or beat him on the head with a bamboo rod or watt ever? Answer : Of course it is, don’t ask answers.
(2) If a new born is in his crib, is it an offense to stay from next door and shine a bright 10 watt laser and damage his retina? Answer : Of course it is, stop asking answers.
(3) Last question, if a new born is in his crib, is it an offense to stay from next door and use 500 watts of acoustic power, and bombard his tender brains with sound waves upsetting the water molecules and developing neurons? Answer : Well I’ll need a meter to decide.
Wrong answer:
This is not the primitive times when barely audible transistor radios were newly invented. Also I don’t know of any available meters for measuring levels of disturbing the peace or disorderly conduct in public. Mr G, please move with the times, number 3 is a crime, you and your officers must stop pretending that you not sure.
Those sleeping in gated communities, or quiet hoods must try and relate to this noisy nuisance and not only show empathy, but demand justice for those being abused as they try to rest in the comfort of their own homes. If you want to bang out your own nut, then acquire JBL head phones. Abuse is abuse by watt ever means.
please share for other environmentalist ONLY, to Follow this link to join WhatsApp group On environmental management and sustainable development international_ EMASDEVI
Climate change: Follow this link to join WhatsApp group On environmental management and sustainable development international_ EMASDEVI
Is Trinidad the Last Large Nesting Site for Leatherback Turtles globally?
Sea turtles have been around about 100 million years and having survived numerous extinction events are struggling to survive the impact of humans. The largest species and most ancient of the sea turtles is the leatherback sea turtle which weighs on average 550 kg, and can reach weights of 916 kg. Unique among turtles, leatherbacks are oceanic, spending the majority of their lives in the open ocean and swimming more than 10,000 km per year, returning only to coastal areas and nesting beaches every 2 or 3 years. The leatherback is one of the most intriguing animals in nature, and we are watching it head towards extinction in front of our eyes,
Globally there are 6 colonies (7 major nesting beaches which support or have supported more than 1,000 leatherback females nesting annually. These represent on a global basis, key index areas for assessment of status of the leatherback. The largest nesting aggregations for the leatherback in the Pacific includes Mexico, Costa Rica, Malaysia and Indonesia in the Pacific and in the Atlantic are found on the beaches of northeastern South America along the coasts of French Guiana and Suriname, in Western Africa on the 600 km long coastline of Gabon, and along the North and East coast of Trinidad.
In 1980, the Pacific populations of the leatherback sea turtle nesting on the coast of Mexico and Costa Rica was reported to exceed 75,000 female turtles, 175,000 nests annually. Today all of the Pacific nesting sites report less than 1000 nests; that is to say all of the nesting populations are severely reduced, or non-existent. The primary cause for this decline was the introduction and large-scale deployment of coastal gillnet fishing for swordfish in the eastern Pacific leatherback foraging areas off Chile and Peru in the early 1980s. In the case of the eastern Pacific population the mortality was directed against reproductive and non-reproductive (large juvenile) turtles as well as eggs. Pacific populations of the leatherback sea turtle: 175,000 nests in 1980. This is the most rapid destruction of any large vertebrate population in history.
The wider Caribbean region supports nesting by 6 of the 7 marine turtle species. While small colonies of leatherbacks nest on beaches from Florida to French Guiana, historically there are only 2 large colonies in the region, and these are located on the beaches of French Guiana / Suriname and on Trinidad. These two major colonies are responsible for more than 90% of all nesting by leatherbacks in the North Atlantic Ocean. However, despite years of conservation efforts, the French Guiana / Suriname nesting colony has collapsed, and Trinidad’s leatherback population is in decline according to a recent assessment by the most comprehensive analysis ever done on the species and published by the Wider Caribbean Sea Turtle Conservation Network (WIDECAST).
In 2018 given this concern the Northwest Atlantic (NWA) Leatherback Working Group was established. Using monitoring data which extended back to 1990 that was contributed by 17 countries, inclusive of Trinidad and Tobago, the team of researchers has shown that the leatherback is in severe trouble in the North Atlantic, and that Trinidad may hold the last best hope for saving the species.
In January 2020 Professor Scott Eckert, primary researcher at WIDECAST visited Trinidad and met with officials of the EMA, IMA, Ministry of Agriculture, Lands and Marine Resources and Turtle conservation groups in an effort to convey the urgency in ensuring Trinidad’s conservation programmes continue in light of the global plight of the species. According to Professor Scott Eckert Trinidad’s population is declining but at a slower rate than the other large nesting colonies in the region at that our hope for saving the species lies in the continuing of the well established National Sea turtle Conservation program on the primary nesting beaches engaging community groups in Trinidad and Tobago that has long protected its nesting beaches. He notes that the key to reversing the decline will be in “maintaining support for nesting beach conservation efforts; enhancing protection of those nesting beaches; reducing local sources of mortality particularly accidentally killing of leatherbacks in gillnets; protecting offshore habitats and increasing hatchling production”.
Over the last ten years, sea turtle monitoring and conservation within Trinidad and Tobago primarily driven by 28 community-based groups under the umbrella of the Turtle Village Trust and through the support of the Green Fund, Atlantic and BHP and in partnership with the EMA, Forestry Division, DNRF (Tobago), IMA and UTT. Like in other WCR countries, this program is committed to contributing towards understanding the drivers in sea turtle nesting. Such data is instrumental in assisting the country in setting of priorities for national and international conservation action, population monitoring and habitat protection, as well as coastal zone management and land use policy.
Given the overall decline, it is important to protect and conserve the genetic leatherback stocks throughout the Caribbean. Failure to do so, may result in the loss of these majestic animals from the region, similar to the once large colonies in the Eastern Pacific Ocean which declined from more that 75,000 nesting turtles to less than 1000 between 1986 and 2000. There are only 5 leatherback genetic stocks reported in the WCR (Trinidad, Suriname and French Guiana, Costa Rica, Florida, and St. Croix). While leatherbacks from Trinidad forage alongside turtles from other genetic stock in the North Atlantic Ocean, they are genetically distinct, and may represent the majority of all turtles found foraging in the waters of Canada. According to research by Dr. Mike James, who has also conducted research on leatherbacks in Trinidad, almost 70% of all leatherbacks that he captures in the waters off Nova Scotia, Canada are from the Trinidad stock. This strengthens the importance of protecting and conserving what may well be the last major nesting sites in Trinidad and Tobago.
Trinidad is blessed to host nesting by this iconic oceanic sea turtle. The opportunity to witness nesting by the largest of all reptiles has long fascinated the tens of thousands of Trinidadians who venture to the beaches of each summer to witness this primordial event. However, without action and a concerted effort to reverse the present decline, the future of leatherbacks is very grim.
Can some some contact me from town and country been calling you'll phones and they aren't working weeks now
2019.07.27
Ms. Camille Robinson-Regis, Minister of Planning and Sustainable Development
Mr. Kazim Hosein, Minister of Rural Development and Local Government
Mr. Rohan Sinanan, Minister of Works and Transport
Chief Magistrate, Ms. Busby-Earle
Police Commissioner, Captain Gary Griffith
Dr. Sammy, Chairman, Penal/Debe Regional Corporation
Chief Executive Officer, Environmental Management Authority
Secretary, Licencing Committee, Victoria West Magisterial District, San Fernando Magistrates Court, San Fernando
Chief Medical Officer, Ministry of Health
County Medical Officer of Health, Pointe-a-Pierre Road, San Fernando
Attention:
Director of Planning, Town and Country Division
Permanent Secretary, Ministry of Rural Development and Local Government
Director of Highways Division, Ministry of Works and Transport
Chief Executive Officer, Penal/Debe Regional Corporation
Director of Planning, Penal/Debe Regional Corporation
Deputy Chief Magistrate, Magistrate’s Court, San Fernando
Assistant Commissioner of Police South
Senior Superintendent, Police Headquarters, San Fernando
Public Health Inspector, Penal Debe Regional Corporation
OBJECTION:
PROPOSED Hosting of Public Functions & Noise Variation at Doc’s Ranch, LP51, S.S.Erin Road, Phillipine, San Fernando
• Ten-Tacular – August 10th 2019
• Summer Fest - August 30th 2019
• Any other
I hereby object to the proposed hosting of events at the above mentioned premises, after 10.00pm to sunrise.
This area is listed as Agricultural/Residential.
I ask that the following be taken into consideration:
• Permission to host a public function was granted to a property that did not have planning permission from the Town and Country Division as noted in letter dated February 2012.
• The Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Penal/Debe Regional Corporation were aware of these violations since November 14th 2011 and failed to respond to my correspondences. No action was initiated by the Penal Debe Regional Corporation.
• Does a Completion Certificate exist and was a Completion Certificate submitted?
• Structures are built within twenty-five feet of the boundary line adjacent to a major roadway. The edge of the roadway is not the boundary line.
• The road reserve has been incorporated as part of the frontage.
• These illegally constructed buildings are now advertised for public usage, including use as a private health facility.
• Does this illegal facility also have permission to sell food?
• Does this illegal facility also have permission to sell alcohol?
Does this property have the necessary approvals to host a public function, starting with a Completion Certificate?
The Permanent Secretary of the Ministry of Rural Development and Local Government in response to my letter of January 2017 stated on September 06th 2017 the following:
“Further, planning permissions are the responsibility of the Town and Country Planning Division,…..”
Followed by:
“The Penal Debe Regional Corporation (PDRC) initially issued a building permit to Doc’s Ranch dated August 28th 2013. Our investigations revealed that the construction took place contrary to the plans submitted. The owner has since advised the PDRC that an application has been submitted for approval of the relevant variation from the Town and Country Planning Division.”
These two above statements by the Penal Debe Regional Corporation are contradictory in nature since Planning Permission has to be approved by TCP before a Building Permit is issued by any Regional Corporation. This contradictory statement is repeated in the letter of the Permanent Secretary of the Ministry of Rural Development and Local Government.
It must be noted that the initial complaint was submitted to the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the PDRC on November 14th 2011. And this is the “first” response via a third-party – Ministry of Rural Development and Local Government, SIX YEARS LATER. And the structures are still illegal as it was in 2011.
The Penal/Debe Regional Corporation had been informed of an illegal structure at LP#51, S.S.Erin Road, Phillipine since November 14th 2011. There were further correspondences dated 14th December 2011, 14th January 2012 and 02nd July 2012. It must be noted that while NO acknowledgement of the correspondences were received, an acknowledgement was noted in a newspaper article of page 9 of the Sunday Express dated 27th November 2011.
Town and Country Planning Division, dated 02nd February 2012, REF: Com.T7L:0182/2011. It says:
Please be informed that a letter of advice was issued to the offender on 2011.12.15.
Further no planning permission was granted for the erection of the existing concrete and wood structure along the San Fernando Siparia Erin Road.
Please be guided accordingly.
Kindly refer to correspondence dated June 22nd 2015 REF: C/T7L/182/2012, Complaint matter relating to development on a site located at LP 51 S.S. Erin Road, Phillipine from the Director, Town and Country Planning Division, 17th Floor, Eric Williams Finance Building, Independence Square, Port of Spain.
This illegally constructed facility should not be given permission to hold a public function with noise variation in a RESIDENTIAL area?
And worse yet, during the hours between 10.00pm to sunrise?
I await your response, as always.
Yours sincerely,
Philip Ayoung-Chee
17C Hillpiece Road, Phillipine, San Fernando
388 6537