13/02/2025
A chapter from the book about how it can be difficult to determine who the aggressor is. Not so often does a person realize that they themselves are the aggressor. And how a correct understanding of what is happening improves the situation.
History. I remember one woman, her name was Leah (name changed), who bitterly complained about her son's aggression. Leah gave countless examples of how lazy her son was and how rudely he behaved towards his mother. Leah scolded her son very often, but he didn't change anything, he remained just as aggressive and rude. Leah went to her friends a lot and complained about her son; they sympathized and commiserated with her. Indeed, her son was unbearable. Finally, Leah went to a psychologist. It was difficult for the specialist to understand what was happening right away because he didn't see Leah's son, so he asked her to tell him about him. Leah said that they used to be very close with her son, but then something happened, and he became very disobedient. Now the son is engaged in sports, and studies, and sometimes works part-time, but at home, he is rude and does nothing. The psychologist suggested to Leah to name what was happening in their home. Leah thought for a long time and said, "Arguments." "Specify who is arguing," the psychologist asked. Leah replied that both she and her son were arguing. Then the specialist suggested an experiment for Leah: three weeks without arguing with her son. Not to reproach him for anything, not to demand anything from him, and see what happens. Two weeks later, Leah called; she was crying. Her son lasted two days, on the third day, he went to the store for groceries and brought back water, and yesterday he mopped the floor himself!
Of course, psychologists, analyzing this case, will name many terms, say that this is separation, and they will be right. But how to make fairly rapid changes? What is the simplest thing to do when the situation inexplicably worsens? In our story, everything miraculously changed as if by magic when Leah was able to name the phenomenon as an argument and then identify the participants: she and her son. Now the psychologist's suggestion to not engage in arguments became clear. You can only argue with someone. If the other party doesn't engage in an argument, the quarrel disappears, and aggression turns into the possibility of reaching an agreement.
Many will ask, could it be that Leah was not involved in the argument, and her son would continue? Yes, it could have been like that. But then the son's behavior would have been inadequate, and one could assume that his character had changed pathologically, and he needed the help of a specialist, for example, a psychiatrist. The second assumption, he started using narcotics and didn't quite understand what was happening. However the psychologist's suggestion was based on information from Leah that her son is studying, working part-time, and engaging in sports, he has many friends. He hoped that the young man was just maturing, which Leah did not consider. That's why unilateral suppression of aggression helped change their relationship.