03/23/2023
Here is question 4 and 5 the Phelps County Focus asked all candidates running for Rolla School Board and the most important for teachers and staff. Please read, thank you.
4. Are you in favor of Proposition I, the 85-cent operating levy increase? Why or why not?
Yes, the City of Rolla should be proud that 48% of the funding for the district comes from local revenue and that we don’t have to rely on state funding as much, which has been flat for the last three years. There is no increase currently being proposed at the state level for funding and the state’s formula is broken. Teacher shortages and turnover are at an all-time high and the current pay structure has become less of a competitive advantage for the district. Attracting people to drive our buses, clean our schools, prepare our student breakfasts and lunches, help our teachers in the classrooms and numerous more staff members, with what we are currently paying our staff, is not sustainable. The cost of hiring and training a new teacher or staff member is immeasurable. The morale of a team that is not adequately staffed and the anxiety that is created can be felt by the students, which is unacceptable. The local levy has not been increased for salaries since 2001. The teachers and staff have had one increase in the last three years and that was 2%. Not only are we asking the great citizens of this district to support this, but we are asking the teachers, staff and administrators to do the same. We are in the people business; we have to invest in people and in our children’s future and we do that by employing the best in the business at RPS. The City of St. James has added $.65 to their ballot in April to compete with Rolla and the loss of teachers to the district. The $.85 increase would rank us in the top ten of neighboring districts and again establish that competitive advantage that Rolla deserves for our teachers, staff and students.
5. Are you in favor of Proposition N, the no-tax increase $10 million bond issue? Why or why not?
Yes, the $10 million bond issue is tax free; it will extend the life of the debt that we currently owe. That being said, it is part of the long-range plan of the district to improve the facilities for our students for years to come. I look at it as the investment in our district for improvements in our buildings, like we would do for ourselves in home improvements. It helps to address one of my top concerns of safety and security of the schools. The previous $25 million bond addressed some of the safety and security concerns through construction, at a few of the schools, along with some additional, measures that were put into place, that were needed. However, we have approximately 300 doors in the district that could be monitored to ensure they are closed. Some of these doors are in need of repair or replaced all together. Propped open doors are a major concern for every school in the country as a form of entry for intruders. One point of entry/exit is another concern that has been addressed at some schools, but not all. I have a lot more ideas and experience that I can bring on the subject of safety and security, if elected. There are 80 HVAC units, on the top of the middle school alone, that are at end of life and need replaced. We all use LED lighting in our homes now and realize the benefit and if replaced in each building, will be much more efficient for the district. If the levy passes and the bond doesn’t, then we will be taking resources away from our people to address safety and maintenance issues, so it is very important that both of these measures pass.