Moore Family Center for Whole Grain Foods, Nutrition & Preventive Health

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Friday, July 17, 2020 Presidential Task Force on Missing and Murdered American Indians and Alaska Natives Announces Virtual Consultations The Presidential Task Force on Missing and Murdered American Indians and Alaska Natives announced 12 Tribal consultations to occur virtually across the United States in the coming months. https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/presidential-task-force-missing-and-murdered-american-indians-and-alaska-natives-announces-0?fbclid=IwAR19GEjV83IkmdiyipqC2HW5gWn91rdXJX3Sk7vzFj_r4ck7deSo8TvVPHY Subject: Indian Treaties” are the law of the land, and a rule of decision in all courts.” Strother v. Lucas, 37 U.S. 410, 12 Pet. 410, 9 L.Ed. 1137 (1838). And;“Congress is bound to regard public Treaties Indian Treaties” are the law of the land, and a rule of decision in all courts.” Strother v. Lucas, 37 U.S. 410, 12 Pet. 410, 9 L.Ed. 1137 (1838). And;“Congress is bound to regard public Treaties.” Reichert v. Felps, 73 U.S. 160, 6 Wall. 160, 18 L.Ed. 849 (1867). And;“Congress cannot by legislation enlarge the federal jurisdiction, and it cannot be enlarged under the treaty making power.” Mayor, Alderman and Inhabitants of City ofNew Orleans v. U.S., 35 U.S. 662, 10 Pet. 662, 9 L.Ed. 573 (1836). And;“A treaty is more than a contract, since the constitution declares it to be the law of the land.” Haver v. Yaker, 76 U.S. 32, 9 Wall. 32, 19 L.Ed. 571 (1869). And;“U.S.Mo. 1920. Valid treaties are binding within the territorial limits of the states as throughout the dominion of the United States.” State of Mo. v. Holland, 40 S.Ct. 382, 252 U.S. 416, 64 L.Ed. 641, 11 A.L.R. 984 (1920). And;"Government is not sovereignty. Government is the machinery or expedient for expressing the will of the sovereign power...This sovereign power in our government belongs to the people, and the government of the United States and the governments of the several states are but the machinery for expounding or expressing the will of the sovereign power . . . But it must be remembered, under our government, all sovereign power is lodged in the people; and the government, by its different departments, can exercise only such power as has been delegated to it by the people. None of these delegated powers can be by the government delegated to some one else.They are only granted to the government to be in proper cases exercised by it, and not to be given to another to be exercised by that other...Because neither congress nor the treaty-making power can grant away the sovereign powers of the government, but they can only exercise them for the people to whom they belong.” Cherokee Nation v.Southern Kan. R. Co., 33 F. 900, 908-13 (1888). See also Pollard’s Lessee v. Hagan et al., 44 U.S. (3 How) 212, 220 and 229 (1845), the Northwest Ordinance and the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo.Notice to all whom these presents may come:“If I am here at all I am so as a man; I am NOT here as a resident of any State (Nation), nor am I of or “in this state”, nor am I a [statutory] "citizen of the United States" (in Congress assembled) as ALL are fictions/creations of government and therefore and as such no statutes apply to Me as evidenced in above cases. I am a Creature of Nature (the Creator) and therefore I am a transient foreigner by Nature while traveling through Life I am here as a in intinere, as a neutral, for a short time, on my way to the greater beyond, a steward of my father’s land and wishes. My documents of “in intinere” standing are recorded for all to see.” See: Dred Scott v. Sanford, 60 US (19 How.) 393, 595 (1857) Justice Curtis, S.Ct. nd the Congress may by general Laws prescribe the Manner in which such Acts, Records and Proceedings shall be proved, and the Effect thereof.Note: Emphasis added to cites, mine!NO Law requires you to record / pledge your private automobile of 24Notice of Full Faith and Credit(I, Me, Myself am a “state”, with standing, standing in “original jurisdiction” know asthe common law, Gods Law, a neutral traveling in itinere, demanding all of my rights under God’s Natural Law, recorded in part in the Bible, which law is recognized in US Public Law 97-280 as “the word of God and all men are admonished to learn and apply it” so I demand anyone and everyone to notice God’s Laws, which are My Makers Laws and therefore My Laws!)– Article 1 of the Bill of Rights – guarantees freedom of religion-Constitution for the United States of America ARTICLE IV, sect. 1, Full faith and credit among states. (Self-executing constitutional provisions) Section 1. Full faith and Credit shall be given in each state to the public Acts, Records, and judicial Proceedings of every other state.And the Congress may by general Laws prescribe the Manner in which such Acts, Records and Proceedings shall be proved, and the Effect thereof.Note: Emphasis added to cites, mine!NO Law requires you to record / pledge your private automobileAMA Hippocratic Oath - The Gersten Institutewww.imagerynet.com/hippo.ama.htmlWe owe the American Medical Association our profound and sincere apology. ... of ethics, but there is, in fact, no version of the Hippocratic Oath that the AMA ...Hippocratic oath | ethical code | Britannica.comwww.britannica.com/topic/Hippocratic-oathHippocratic oath: Ethical code attributed to the ancient Greek physician Hippocrates, adopted as a guide to conduct by the medical profession throughout the ages and still used in the graduation... ... Help us improve this article! Contact our . Subject: Fw: PRIVATE PROPERTY IS TAX EXEMPT. good info He will say yes, of course. Ask why he refuses to classify it as private property. He will either explain to you that he cannot tax property unless it is classified pursuant to constitutional limitations (residential, industrial, agricultural), t. I mean, doh, what do you think is the COLLATERAL for the federal (national) debt? Property of all US PERSONS! "Property which is taxed is always identified by one of three commercial classifications: residential, industrial or agricultural. Private property cannot be taxed! Contact your Tax Assessor and ask for a written explanation of the numbered codes appearing on your property tax statement. Once you have deciphered the statement, you will find your property classified by one of the above commercial designations. Write a letter to your Tax Assessor, explaining that you have discovered an error in your tax statement. Do not mention the tax itself, as the error in question relates only to the classification. Explain that your property has mistakenly been classified as __________ (agricultural, industrial, residential), and to please correct the classification to read "private." Ask the Assessor to notify you by mail once the matter has been handled. Be polite and sign the letter, using words like "Sincerely", "Best wishes", etc. There is no reason be belligerent at this point. If the Assessor honors your wishes, you will never see a property tax statement again. If, as is more likely, the Assessor writes back, refusing to adjust his records, you may now open up discussion as to why not. Ask whether you have the right to own private property. He will say yes, of course. Ask why he refuses to classify it as private property. He will either explain to you that he cannot tax property unless it is classified pursuant to constitutional limitations (residential, industrial, agricultural), or he will reveal to you that you do not really own the property (in which case he has admitted to fraud, nullifying the transfer of property in the first place, since you were not aware of what you were doing at the time). In either case, once the Assessor brings up taxation, you can now make the argument that your real property has been re-classified, without your permission, for the sole purpose of taxation. This is the firm basis for a lawsuit." Because Philadelphia is the international service center, the foreign service-center, which makes perfect sense since the income tax is atax on foreign activity only!The IRS Philadelphia office has never been known to reject a Statement of Citizenship from a withholding agent. It also does not acknowledge receipt of the Statement of Citizenship, which confuses some people. The reason for this is simple. If the statement were inaccurate or off-point, there would be rebuttal from Philadelphia. Silence, in this case, is acceptance.Because of a deluge of requests and attention focused on IRS Publication 515 and 26 CFR § 1.1441-5 by patriotic Americans who didn’t want to have to pay or file incometaxes legally in 1998, under 26 CFR § 1.1441-5 was rewritten in 1993!!! The cover-upexpands! Instead, all we are left with is a confusing pointer back to Circular E, the Employer’s Tax Guide, and no mention of how to handle nonresident aliens!! Apparently, the truth got just a little too close for comfort so the Great Deceiver bureaucrat lawyers in Congress and at the IRS had to bury it a little deeper in legalese to confuse the scent for us tax freedom hound dogs!! BARK, BARK!!! Sick-em!FRAUD UPON THE PEOPLE under Title 18 U.S.C. § 1001, By Trickery, lies, dishonor ISSUE(S)(1) (i) In the situation described below, how is a Delaware statutory trust, described inDel. Code Ann. title 12, §§ 3801 – 3824, classified for federal tax purposes?(2) (ii) obligations of the United States or of a State or political subdivision thereof, and stock or obligations of a corporation which is an instrumentality of the United States or of a State or political subdivision thereof, but not including obligations the interest on which is excludable from gross income under section 103,(3) (iii) certificates of deposit in, or obligations of, a corporation organized under a State law which specifically authorizes such corporation to insure the deposits or share accounts of member associations,(4) (iv) loans secured by a deposit or share of a member,(5) (v) loans (including redeemable ground rents, as defined in section 1055) secured by an interest in real property which is (or, from the proceeds of the loan, will become) residential real property or real property used primarily for church purposes, loans made for the improvement of residential real property or real property used primarily for church purposes, provided that for purposes of this clause, residential real property shall include single or multifamily dwellings, facilities in residential developments dedicated to public use or property used on a nonprofit basis for residents, and mobile homes not used on a transient basis,(6) (vi) loans secured by an interest in real property located within an urban renewal area to be developed for predominantly residential use under an urban renewal plan approved by the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development under part A or part Bof title I of the Housing Act of 1949, as amended, or located within any area covered by a program eligible for assistance under section 103 of the Demonstration Cities and Metropolitan Development Act of 1966, as amended, and loans made for the improvement of any such real property,(7) (vii) loans secured by an interest in educational, health, or welfare institutions or facilities, including structures designed or used primarily for residential purposes for students, residents, and persons under care, employees, or members of the staff of such institutions or facilities,(8) (viii) property acquired through the liquidation of defaulted loans described in clause (v), (vi), or (vii),(9) (ix) loans made for the payment of expenses of college or university education or vocational training, in accordance with such regulations as may be prescribed by the Secretary, And,(x) Property used by the association in the conduct of the business described in subparagraph (B), and(xi) any regular or residual interest in a real estate mortgage investment conduit, (REMIC) is "an entity that holds a fixed pool of mortgages and issues multiple classesof interests in itself to investors" under U.S. Federal income tax law and is "treated like a partnership for Federal income tax purposes with its income passed through to its interest holders". but only in the proportion which the assets of such REMIC consist of property described in any of the preceding clauses of this subparagraph; except that if 95 percent or more of the assets of such REMIC are assets described in clauses (i) through (x), the entire interest in the REMIC shall qualify. At the election of the taxpayer, the percentage specified in this subparagraph shall be applied on the basis of the average assets outstanding during the taxable year, in lieu of the close of the taxable year, computed under regulations prescribed by the Secretary. For purposes of clause (v), if a multifamily structure securing a loan is used in part for nonresidential purposes, the entire loan is deemed a residential real property loan if the planned residential use exceeds 80 percent of the property’s planned use (determined as of the time the loan is made). For purposes of clause (v), loans made tofinance the acquisition or development of land shall be deemed to be loans secured byan interest in residential real property if, under regulations prescribed by the Secretary, there is reasonable assurance that the property will become residential real property within a period of 3 years from the date of acquisition of such land; but this sentence shall not apply for any taxable year unless, within such 3-year period, such land becomes residential real property. For purposes of determining whether any interest in a REMIC qualifies under clause (xi), any regular interest in another REMIC held by such REMIC shall be treated as a loan described in a preceding clause under principles similar to the principles of clause (xi); except that, if such REMIC’s are part of a tiered structure, they shall be treated as 1 REMIC for purposes of clause (xi).Whereas :As I stated in court, plaintiff (Wells Fargo) is not here, and asked for a Dismissal. Thus, the court agreed that, under OCGA §17-4-23, the officer had no authority to make a traffic arrest outside of his jurisdiction. Third, the court examined OCGA §17-4-20(a) to determine if that code section supports the officer’s authority to arrest Zilke outside of his jurisdiction. File Size: 256KB Page Count: 5 U.S. Supreme Court ruling protects right of homeless to sleep outside Homeless advocates won a major victory Monday when the U.S. Supreme Court decided to leave in place a landmark ruling preventing cities from rousting people from street camps unless they offer them shelter or housing. But they’d really already won more than a year ago. Resignation of a BAR member in her Words. I´m announcing my resignation from whatever ties I have as a BAR attorney, effective July 4, 2019. This is being sent to Maureen O´Connor, who carries the title of Chief Justice of the corporate Supreme Court of Ohio, Here is a copy and paste of the letter. I signed the original, as a living human being, not as a corporation: Maureen O´Connor, Chief Justice SUPREME COURT OF OHIO, THE 65 S Front St Columbus, Ohio [43215] TO ALL CONCERNED: This letter is for the purpose of publicly announcing that I am resigning as an attorney licensed to “practice law” in the State of Ohio. No one is pressuring me to make this decision. I have no reason to believe there are any attorney disciplinary proceedings pending or being initiated against me. My decision is based solely on my own conscience and sense of ethics. I understand it to be irrevocable. As a follower of the teachings of our Creator , I find I can no longer associate myself with those who have abandoned the pursuit of earthly justice in favor of money and power. In particular, I can no longer rationalize the legal system´s increasing disregard of basic Constitutional principles, such as the rights of Us the People to not have our lives, liberties, or properties taken from us without due process of law, the right to bear arms without government approval, the right to be free of unreasonable searches and seizures, and the multiple rights enshrined in the now increasingly ignored First Amendment. I took an oath to become an “officer of the court” and to support the Constitution, not corporate interests, during a mass swearing-in ceremony in Columbus in the spring of 1977. I can no longer tolerate seeing that Constitution besmirched by “courts” at every level. In particular, I can no longer stomach the prospect of ever again working in a system that disregards plain meaning of both its own corporate statutes it calls “law” as well as the principles of higher jurisdictions of Common Law, the Constitution, and holy scripture. I cannot be part of a system that exempts corrupt judges from liability for crimes they commit against their fellow men, women and children under color of law [Stump v. Sparkman, 435 U.S. 349 (1978)], a system that condones pe******ia [State v. Mole, 2016-Ohio-5124; In re CP, 131 Ohio St.3d 513 (2012)], a system that denies recovery of compensation for those whose lives are shattered by the well-connected and the corporations [Arbino v. Johnson & Johnson, 2007-Ohio-6948], a system that destroys attorneys such as Richard Fine who legitimately criticize “judges” [http://edition.cnn.com/…/jailed.lawyer.richard.f…/index.html],a system, in short, that is very much bifurcated into one kind of justice for the wealthy and another, very different one, for the rest of us. The last straw for me occurred a few months ago when I finally began to learn about the giant hoax that has been perpetrated against the American people, a process that continues to be expedited by attorneys and judges. My previous belief that the judiciary was a branch of our Constitutionally mandated republic was destroyed when I read former attorney Melvin Stamper´s book, Fruit from a Poisonous Tree and confirmed the truth of everything he disclosed and for which I could find documentation. What I now know, and which is still concealed from most of the American people, is that our “courts” are private, for-profit corporations that trade in on the churning of controversy for profit via systems such as CRIS (Court Registry Investment System). The most nauseating features of this type of corporate profiteering are not just the multiple frauds that support it, but the fact that it preys on the old, the young, and the disenfranchised of all races and genders. And it does so for dollars or should I say, for Federal Reserve Notes. Finally, I require that my name be stricken from the rolls of the Ohio Supreme Court due to my recent discovery that any retention by me of “any title of nobility or honour [sic]”, such as attorney at law, esquire, or any version thereof, may be prohibited by the original Thirteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, which Amendment was apparently ratified in Ohio on January 31, 2011. Fw: HUMAN CAPITAL, William J. Clinton: "Executive Order 13037— March 3, 1997 (b) The appropriate definition of capital for Federal budgeting, including: use of capital for the Federal Government itself or the economy at large; ownership by the Federal Government or some other entity; defense and nondefense capital; physical capital and intangible or human capital; distinctions among investments in and for current, future, and retired workers; distinctions between capital to increase productivity and capital to enhance the quality of life; and existing definitions of capital for budgeting; The state is a corporation, not an injured party with affidavit. LAWYERS AND ATTORNEYS ARE NOT LICENSED TO PRACTICE LAW THE NATURE OF LAWYER-CRAFT IN AMERICA AS PER THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT; The practice of Law CAN NOT be licensed by any state/State. (Schware v. Board of Examiners, 353 U.S. 238, 239) The practice of Law is AN OCCUPATION OF COMMON RIGHT! (Sims v. Aherns, 271 S.W. 720 (1925)) Whereas : “It is a clearly established principle of law that an attorney must represent a corporation, it being incorporeal and a creature of the law. An attorney representing an artificial entity must appear with the corporate charter and law in his hand. A person acting as an attorney for a foreign principal must be registered to act on the principal’s behalf.” See, Foreign Agents Registration Act” (22 USC § 612 et seq.); Victor Rabinowitz et. at. v. Robert F. Kennedy,376 US 605. “Failure to file the "Foreign Agents Registrations Statement" goes directly to the jurisdiction and lack of standing to be before the court, and is a felony pursuant to 18 USC §§ 219, 951. The conflict of law, interest and allegiance is obvious. A Lawyer can not make a claim to your rights , Only you can . Federal District Court Judge James Alger Fee's mind blowing assertion in United States v. Johnson, 76 F. Supp. 538 (M.D. Pa. 1947) U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania - 76 F. Supp. 538 (M.D. Pa. 1947) February 26, 1947 , Congress cannot by legislation enlarge the federal jurisdiction, and it cannot be enlarged under the treaty making power.” Mayor, Alderman and Inhabitants of City of New Orleans v. U.S., 35 U.S. 662, 10 Pet. 662, 9 L.Ed. 573 (1836). And; 18 U.S. Code § 661 - Within special maritime and territorial jurisdiction Ed Johnston http://new.oregontrackers.com/ "Ed Johnston" The time for me to step down has arrived. My health issues are not improving and I, in order to get my condition under control have got to get rid of stress. Blood pressure not under control. I will concentrate on the my court, write it, file it, and be done with this mess once and for all. Please find a replacement as soon as ... Edward Johnstons Letters and Cases This Page is the Various Letters and Cases Edward has... Ed's Latest New thoughts of the week; Davidlee Buess. Taxes; Ed's Stuff.... Taxes Internal Revenue Service. All lawful bloodline Americans.... Affidavit and Its Meaning "THE POWER BEHIND AN AFFIDAVIT OF TRUTH" Whereas; Affidavits... Protecting Your Lawful Bloodline American Rights to Work NEW POLITICAL CENTER This website emerged as a result of the... Ed' Evidence Against The City of Toledo and Flunkies Wilson v Omaha Tribe, 442 US653 667, 61 L Ed 2d 153, 99 S Ct... May 22, 2019 · 28 USC 3002 Definitions. As used in this chapter:.... (15) “United States” means— (A) a Federal corporation; (B) an agency, department, commission, board, or other entity of the United States; or (C) an instrumentality of the United States. I am not a Attorney or a Psychiatrist, I do not give either legal or psychiatric advice. All statements made here are my opinions from my personal experience and research and should not be mistaken or misconstrued as advice of any kind. u.c.c 1-308 formerly 1-207.......reservation of rights....,plus {jut naturale},-{jus soli}...The Greatspirit , Mother Earth , The Creator rights for man,earths rights for man....the other that is illegal and unlawful is the {B.A.R} statutes-codes-ordinances that are in repugnance of the primary protocol of your rights or marbury v. madison 5 u.s. 137 {1803}...... " Byars v. United States - 273 US 128 "Any constitutional provision intended to confer a benefit should be liberally construed in favor of the clearly inten ded and expressly designated beneficiary" Contact Ed at http://new.oregontrackers.com/public-notice-board.html http://new.oregontrackers.com/ho this is why it has to be done in Admiralty law: In Title 28 U.S.C. Judiciary and Judicial Procedure, in the chapter and section that defines “court,” “debt,” “judgment,” and “United States” (Chapter 176 Federal Debt Collection Procedure, Section 3002), “United States” means a Federal corporation (28 U.S.C. 3002(15)).Title 28 United States Code” means, literally, Title 28 ... me.html ""police officer"" if your an Lawful bloodline American inhabited in a city county state,""police officer"" enforce who ignore officials committing Federal felony for any reason on elected and public servants are financial for any crimes committed they are liable for all and any a crimes committed in their jurisdiction by any Alien or immigrant ... 28 U.S. Code § 3002 - Definitions | U.S. Code | US Law | LII . https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/28/3002 Treaties and Constitution v Bankruptcy Act of 1933 and Title28USC 3002 Title 28USC3002 Section15(A(B)C) and includes any amount owing to the United States for the benefit of an Indian tribe or individual Indian, but excludes any amount to which the United States is entitled under section 3011(a). (4) “ Debtor ” means a person who is liable for a debt or against whom there is a claim for a debt. (16) “United States marshal” means a United States marshal, a deputy marshal, or an official of the United States Marshals Service designated under section 564 . Read this complete 28 U.S.C. § 3002 - U.S. Code - Unannotated Title 28. Judiciary and Judicial Procedure § 3002. UNITED STATES is a CORPORATION – There are Two Constitutions ... https://www.investmentwatchblog.com/united-states-is-a-cor…/ Aug 26, 2011 · 28 USC 3002 “(15) “United States” means— (A) a Federal corporation; (B) an agency, department, commission, board, or other entity of the United States; or (C) an instrumentality of the United States.” It means what organizations may sue to collect a debt owed to the US. WHAT? Title 28 USC 3002 Section 15 – States That THE UNITED ... http://alexanderhiggins.com/title-28-usc-3002-section-15-t…/ Apr 08, 2016 · Title 28 USC 3002 Section 15 (A) (B) (C) states that THE UNITED STATES is a FEDERAL CORPORATION and not a Government (note the capitalization, indicating the corporation, not the Republic), including the Judiciary Procedural Section. Title 28 of the United States Code - Wikipedia en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Title_28_of_the_United... Title 28 (Judiciary and Judicial Procedure) is the portion of the United States Code (federal statutory law) that governs the federal judicial system. It is divided into six parts: Part I: Organization of Courts; Part II: Department of Justice; Part III: Court Officers and Employees; Part IV: Jurisdiction and Venue; Part V: Procedure Full text of "Title 28 USC 3002 Section 15 A States That The ... https://archive.org/…/Title28USC30…/jewel.complaint_djvu.txt Full text of "Title 28 USC 3002 Section 15 A States That The United ... 26 27 28 234. Title 18 U.S.C. § 2712 provides a civil action against the United States and . 28 U.S. Code § 2002 - Notice of sale of realty | U.S. Code ... https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/28/2002 Word “under” was substituted for “ordered pursuant to section 847 of this title by” after “A public sale of realty or interest therein”. Sections 847 and 848 , of title 28 , U.S.C., 1940 ed., now sections 2001 and 2004 of this title, relate only to sales under orders or decrees, without any reference to sales under judgments. What does U.S.C 3002 15 (a) mean? - Quora https://www.quora.com/What-does-U-S-C-3002-15-a-mean