04/07/2026
Rare that state agencies themselves take the lead in questioning thoughtless legislation, rather than the people of Iowa whose oxen are being gored. Exactly what happened today when Republicans in the House of Representatives heard from the Economic Development Authority, Department of Transportation, Iowa National Guard, the Department of Health and Human Services, Department of Education, Iowa Board of Regents, Department of Administrative Services, Department of Public Safety, and Homeland Security and Emergency Management regarding the onerous proposal (HSB 764) to require permission from the Legislature before the state can apply for a federal grant. Usually the agency lobbyists just meet privately with Republican leaders to express their concerns. The testimony was a laundry list of “administrative burden” and “unintended consequences.” Pretty sure this signals a veto if such a bill ever makes it to the governor. (Rare that any governor agrees to give up Institutional power, anyhow.)
The committee chair claimed “transparency” is the goal of the bill, not an attempt to delay or prevent the receipt of federal dollars. Not sure the national astroturf group that ginned up the bill would agree with that, nor Iowans for Tax Relief fronting for them. (Americans for Prosperity took their usual shot at “unelected bureaucrats” making decisions.)
Appropriations Committee Chair Gary Mohr wondered if any of the state agencies think it is OK for the Legislature to exercise oversight of federal funding and how it is used. That’s when the audio feed for the meeting was cut off. When it was restored, subcommittee chair Hans Wilz was thanking everyone for “stopping by.” I assume the answers were all, “Yes, of course.” (BTW, between the State and the public universities, Iowa gets about $13.5 billion a year through Uncle Sam, more than the state General Fund budget.)
My question: Why the sudden interest in state oversight of federal monies now, when House Republicans have shown little interest in picking up the microscope the previous 15 years they have been in power?
Oh yeah, could it be because Iowa might soon have its first Democratic governor in 16 years?
In the Iowa Legislature