06/15/2026
Today is a longish post as I include minutes that El sent after attending a meeting by the ACLU on how law enforcement needs to or does not need to cooperate with ICE. I literally have posted the amazing notes El took that also includes action steps.
Opposing 287(g) Agreements Between ICE and NC Law Enforcement
ACLU-NC, June 9, 2026 7-8pm
Background Information:
- 287(g) agreements deputize local police as immigration enforcement
- Collaboration includes sharing information about people encountered, honoring detainers, notifying ICE of people in custody, and logistical support and involvement between local police and ICE
- They aim to enlist 20,000 state/local police in 287(g), an 80% increase in their capacity
- Using local police as a force multiplier is a key tool to carry out the federal deportation agenda, so local advocacy is key to opposition
- DHS Director Markwayne Mullin plans to accelerate use of this program
- DHS’s explicit white supremacist goal is to deport 1/3 of the US population
- ICE will reimburse participating police departments up to 25% of the annual salary, overtime, and benefits of trained 287(g) officers; they also offer “monetary performance awards” of up to $1000 per eligible task force officer
- Part of the strategy is to make local police budgets dependent on ICE funding in order to coerce their continuing cooperation
- Number of 287(g) agreements grew from 144 to 1,479 from January 2025 to January 2026
- More than 1,000 law enforcement agencies in 40 states have joined 287(g) agreements
- Local jurisdictions can opt out / pull out unless they’re in a mandated state (TX & FL)
- Agreements can happen suddenly without the community knowing
- ICE website lists active & pending agreements; pending often becomes active very rapidly
- 287(g) agreements cause rise in racial profiling, distrust in law enforcement, fear of calling 911, and fear of engaging in public life; they harm everyone, not immigrants alone
Task Force Model:
- Local police perform street level enforcement such as traffic stops, checkpoints, harassment at public gatherings, etc.
- Interrogate any person believed to be an immigrant
- Arrest people without a warrant in certain situations
- Take and maintain custody of individuals arrested by another law enforcement agency
- Detain and transport people
- Grew from 0 to about 800 agreements of this kind from January 2025 to January 2026
Warrant Service Officer Model:
- Serve and execute administrative warrants of arrest for immigration violations
- Take and maintain custody of people arrested by another law enforcement agency
- Grew from ≈100 to ≈500 agreements of this kind from January 2025 to January 2026
Jail Enforcement Model:
- Local police investigate immigration status and notify ICE of individuals being held
- Grew from ≈50 to ≈180 agreements of this kind from January 2025 to January 2026
North Carolina:
- Currently twenty-eight 287(g) agreements in NC
- NC has no law requiring 287(g) agreements; however, HB10 and HB318 require other kinds of cooperation between sheriffs and ICE
- SB153, pending a veto override vote, would require state police like highway patrol to enter 287(g) agreements
- Local lawmakers cannot prohibit 287(g) agreements in NC but can require transparency & accountability, which also slows them down and disincentivizes them (see below)
- NC has mandated reporting of traffic stops with demographic data; it showed a pattern of racial profiling in counties with 287(g) agreements
Goals of Adding Oversight:
- Increase public transparency of 287(g) participation
- Delay applications with pre-approval requirements/processes
- Impose “performance measurement” and other accountability requirements
- Create liabilities for not meeting local requirements
- Create a paper trail supporting public concern and local litigation
Model Policies:
- All counties – County Commissioners CANNOT require pre-approval before the Sheriff enters into a 287(g) agreement but CAN require activity & cost reporting and direct the County Attorney to produce a report assessing the liability risks of participation
- Municipalities with NO 287(g) agreement – City/Town Council CAN require pre-approval before local police enter 287(g) agreements; can also require a public comment period, liability assessment from the City/Town Attorney, and mandate activity & cost reporting
- Municipalities WITH a 287(g) agreement – Can add oversight by requiring activity & cost reporting and directing the City/Town Attorney to assess liability risks of participation
Advocacy:
- Successful resistance means locally tailored strategy
- Educate local police and elected officials about how they give up their power and redirect resources away from more pressing community safety activity with these agreements (model letters in toolkit, link below)
- Raise community awareness and demonstrate public opposition
- Mass letters, call & text campaigns, sharing stories of affected people/communities
- Suggested message structure – 1. Value, 2. Problem, 3. Solution, 4. Action
- Core Values – community safety & protection, trust between communities & government/law enforcement, government accountability & transparency, civil rights, racial justice, and human dignity
- ACLU can facilitate networking between anti-287(g) elected officials & police
- ACLU & voting rights partners are working on threat of having ICE at polls (link below)
Intergovernmental Service Agreement:
- Different agreement from 287(g)
- Local jail houses ICE detainees and is compensated for it, whereas 287(g) transfers people from local police custody into ICE custody
- Can take up space needed to house more significant threats to the community
- Not public record like 287(g) are
- Local police may have (n)either or both
- Ask your friendly member of Congress to track it
Links:
ACLU 287(g) Research Report
https://www.aclu.org/publications/deputized-for-disaster
ACLU 287(g) Toolkit
https://www.acluofnorthcarolina.org/publications/287g-toolkit/
ACLU-NC 287(g) Tracker and Background Info
https://www.acluofnorthcarolina.org/287g/
ACLU-NC Anti-287(g) Volunteer/Partner Interest Form
https://act.acluofnc.org/a/287g-agreement-all
ACLU-NC Know Your Rights / Voter Intimidation Info
https://www.acluofnorthcarolina.org/know-your-rights/voter-intimidation/
Questions - Email
[email protected]
We all need to be knowing what our local City Councils and local police departments will and will not do to support ICE.
https://engageddefendersfordemocracy.substack.com/p/we-all-need-to-know-about-287g-and?
Every eligible citizen has the right to cast a ballot freely, fairly, and accessibly — without fear of deception or intimidation.