Fort Edward Democratic Committee

Fort Edward Democratic Committee The Fort Edward Democratic Committee (FEDC) represents and supports Democrats in the town and village of Fort Edward, NY.

My essay in today’s Post-Star about political apathy in ignored rural communities, like where we live in Fort Edward, NY...
08/22/2026

My essay in today’s Post-Star about political apathy in ignored rural communities, like where we live in Fort Edward, NY, and how I became so engaged in local politics. It’s behind a paywall [consider subscribing if you’re able], but I included a pic of the piece below. If you have a moment to peruse, let me know what you think. This is a conversation worth having, and I value your opinions.

https://poststar.com/opinion/editorial/article_35004b36-fd0d-4cc1-8553-cfaffe749b94.html

This brand new ad hits its mark. Let me know what you think.
08/18/2026

This brand new ad hits its mark. Let me know what you think.

Enjoy the videos and music you love, upload original content, and share it all with friends, family, and the world on YouTube.

08/17/2026

From Ben and the Fort Edward Stops PFAS team:

The Village of Fort Edward ZBA hearing on the ESMI appeal of the Village Codes determination is on for this Wednesday, 8/19 at 6:00 pm at the FE Fire Department.

If you're free, please try to attend. Strength in numbers!

This Rolling Stone article was just released. It's behind a paywall... so, send me an email and I'll share the text.
07/31/2026

This Rolling Stone article was just released. It's behind a paywall... so, send me an email and I'll share the text.

Anthony Constantino, a Donald Trump-loving sticker magnate running for Congress in New York, is everything wrong with our politics in the MAGA era.

I have a new op/ed in today's Schenectady, New York Daily Gazette criticizing mass media's lack of engagement in rural c...
07/28/2026

I have a new op/ed in today's Schenectady, New York Daily Gazette criticizing mass media's lack of engagement in rural congressional elections and urging more national attention.

Again, the piece is behind a paywall, but I'm including an image of the published page and pasting the text below.

Please, take a moment to read.
__________
Pay Attention!

We matter and we’ve been ignored for too long.

A vote cast by a representative of NY-21 counts exactly as much on the floor of Congress as a vote cast by another representative from Manhattan or Brooklyn. One member, one vote, whether the district is a rural expanse the size of several New England states or a few square miles of Upper East Side real estate. And yet the coverage isn’t remotely proportional. Open any national news outlet’s political vertical during an election cycle and you’ll find deep, granular reporting on a handful of marquee races: the Senate contests, the presidential battlegrounds, the odd suburban swing seat that fits a tidy narrative... Districts like mine, the ones that stretch from dairy farms to former mill towns to Adirondack hamlets, get a paragraph if we’re lucky, usually filed under “can Democrats win back rural America,” as though we’re a case study rather than nearly 780,000 people trying to get through a tough political winter.

This is a decision made by taste-makers about where attention, and by extension resources, are allowed to flow. National coverage shapes national fundraising, which, in turn, shapes which campaigns can afford to buy ads, staff, and the basic infrastructure of a competitive race. When outlets decide a district isn’t “interesting” enough to cover with any depth, they’re helping determine whether that district’s candidates can compete… at all.

We are not a concept; we are actual people fighting for our political lives. I am watching this play out up close as chair of the Fort Edward, NY Democratic Committee. We are significantly outnumbered in voter registration; we are underfunded compared to a self-funded opponent; and still, by every account, this race is almost a dead heat because the people here are paying far closer attention than the national press seems to think we’re capable of doing. We are not a curiosity. We are a constituency, the same as any other, with the same capacity to be organized, persuaded, and mobilized, if anyone in the national media bothers to make the case for us.

There’s a deeper irony here. The same commentators who lament that Democrats have lost touch with rural America rarely assign a reporter to cover what’s happening in rural America’s competitive races while they’re happening. The story arrives after the fact, as an autopsy not as coverage. By then it’s too late to really matter.

So consider this commentary from one of the Forgotten Districts, written right now in the thick of a tight race. NY-21 is not a symbol of something abstract. No, we are an real place with actual candidates and what's up for grabs is a congressional seat with a vote that counts the same as every other vote in Washington D.C.… and this district is currently a battleground in a way that could tell you something real about where this country is headed.

Pay attention to us, not because we’re a metaphor for what’s wrong with the Democratic Party, and not because we make a nice feature once every four years. Pay attention because we matter in exactly the same mathematical sense that every other district matters. Ignoring us until Election Night is like reading the last page of a Willa Cather novel first.

Brian P. Katz is a retired English professor and chair of the Fort Edward Democratic Committee in Washington County, NY.

I wrote a guest editorial for the Glens Falls Post-Star in today's (7/23/26) newspaper about the morally complicated fin...
07/23/2026

I wrote a guest editorial for the Glens Falls Post-Star in today's (7/23/26) newspaper about the morally complicated financial cost of local elections. There's a paywall; however, here's the whole essay:

The Other Velvet Rope

I simply cannot financially afford to be in politics.

A year ago I accepted the role of Democratic Committee chairperson for the Fort Edward Democrats. Retiring early from academia, I thought it would be a good way to dig deeper into the world of politics in a region where my party was struggling. I wanted… I want… to make a difference. And I’m all in. But the cost is exorbitant.

In an election year, events in support of our local candidates are held regularly. And as Democrats in Washington County, we are outnumbered and underfunded; every dollar has to work harder here than it does downstate. So when our candidates present meet-and-greets with donation tiers, I understand the reasoning. Fundraising is how a campaign survives in a district where the other side is already loaded or self-funding to the tune of millions. At first, I jumped in and gladly paid the price of admission. I got to know our local candidates, maybe even befriended one or two. But now that we’re closer to Election Day, the prices are rising, and the tiers are stacking.

I’m okay. My family is fine, although within our house, my wife and I have some serious concerns about our and our country's financial future… especially in regards to healthcare. But I now feel priced out of the very events I wholeheartedly want to support. I deeply care about this region and I adore our candidates; however, the velvet rope has fallen, and like an unfashionably dressed patron, I am standing on the wrong side.

Here’s what troubles me most: I’m not describing a personal budgeting failure. I’m describing the going rate of admission to democracy in a district where Democratic policies will improve people's lives. The messaging is mixed and, for me, this is a moral issue.

Grassroots politics is supposed to run on community grit, not entry fees. When the local committee chair, the person supposedly closest to the ground, has to think twice about a "cheap" ticket that would cost more than a week's grocery bill, what does that say about who actually gets a seat at the table? It says the table was never built for us in the first place.

This isn’t a complaint about any one candidate or campaign. Campaigns need money to compete, and I don’t begrudge anyone the tiers; I understand the math. But I think we, as a party, need to reckon honestly with what we’re asking of the volunteers who hold this whole thing together between elections: the local committees; the petitioners braving the elements as they go door to door; the people who show up to stuff envelopes, make phone calls, write texts, and bake cookies because they believe in something. We ask for their labor for free and then price them out of the room where the actual relationship-building happens.

There’s a version of Democratic politics that still believes in this: that a retired teacher in Fort Edward and a dairy farmer in Lisbon are on the same side of the rope, not opposite sides of it. Place over party. Neighbor over net worth.

I don’t have a tidy policy fix to offer here, only a plea to the people running these campaigns, at every level, from town committee to Congress: find a way to let the people who can’t pay still get in the room. We are the ones who will be here in January doing the unglamorous work of keeping these towns and villages organized long after the donor events are a memory.

I still believe in this work with all my heart and I will fight with every ounce of my being to get our candidates elected. I just wish it didn’t cost so much money to prove it.

Brian P. Katz is a retired college professor and current Chair of the Fort Edward Democratic Committee.

Brian Katz, of Fort Edward, writes about the high price of participating in local political committees.

07/15/2026

Quick note from Ben Bramlage of the Fort Edward Stops PFAS group about tonight's Zoning Board meeting:

Good morning. Sorry for the short notice but as of late yesterday the Fort Edward ZBA hearing scheduled for tonight has been postponed until at least August at the request of ESMI/Veolia. I’m working on getting more details. Other legal issues regarding the plant’s operations have been raised at the Town level now as well.

07/08/2026

Ben Bramlage with the The Fort Stops PFAS team shared the following update with us:

On Monday, June 1, Veolia closed on it’s purchase of Enviri’s entire Clean Earth portfolio for $3.04 billion. This includes all 18 of Clean Earth’s facilities and operations, mostly based on the east coast. There are 3 thermal desorption facilities in the 18 – Philadelphia PA, Loudon NH and Fort Edward.

On June 2, Veolia formally requested that DEC suspend review of the PFAS permit application for Fort Edward indefinitely. DEC did so and cancelled the public hearings that were scheduled and closed the reopened public comment period. FOILed records show that DEC was advised by ESMI on May 22 that the request to suspend was coming so that Veolia could “review the application internally”.

The fact that Veolia closed on the purchase of Enviri’s Clean Earth portfolio, including ESMI on Monday and then requested DEC to suspend the application process on Tuesday is very telling. Clearly Veolia had identified concerns with the application prior to the closing but couldn’t act on them until they took ownership of CE/ESMI. For the applicant to request DEC to suspend the process on their own application is very unusual but it is a positive development in this case. It means to us that the opposition to the project by the communities that it would will impact and by the elected officials of those communities was heard by Veolia.

Veolia has options now that were not available when it was Clean Earth driving the project. They could review the application, make no changes to it and ask DEC to resume the review by scheduling public hearings. They could come back with a modified application and DEC would need to decide whether to resume the process or view it as a new application and start the review all over. They could come back with an entirely new application and DEC would have to begin an entirely new review. Or they could withdraw the application altogether. Even if they withdrew it, they could submit a new application at any time.

The Fort Edward ZBA process remains unchanged as that is about ESMI’s current and past operations. Therefore Veolia still faces legal challenges at the Village and also possibly the Town of Fort Edward levels. I believe that these are going to be difficult challenges to overcome since they are based on home rule, which has been upheld by the courts time and again, particularly when public health, public safety and environmental protection are concerned. These are the core of our communities’ concerns and the reason for such strong opposition. How Veolia chooses to proceed with the Village ZBA hearings will be very telling in regards to how committed Veolia is to the Fort Edward project. The next hearing is Thursday July 16 at 6pm at the Fort Edward Fire Department. It should be mostly open public comment as the bulk of testimony should be completed. I encourage everyone to attend and speak in support of the ZBA and in support of municipalities rights of public health and safety.

Join Devin Lander for NYS Senate and Blake Gendebien for the North Country this Sunday, 7/12 from 12 to 2 in Greenwich.
07/07/2026

Join Devin Lander for NYS Senate and Blake Gendebien for the North Country this Sunday, 7/12 from 12 to 2 in Greenwich.

Address

Fort Edward, NY

Website

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Fort Edward Democratic Committee posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Shortcuts

Share