08/15/2026
Public Records Raise Questions About Councilmember Chris Nettles’ Daycare
Over the past several weeks, I have been reviewing public records concerning Haven of Purpose Child Care Center, which is associated with Fort Worth City Councilmember Chris Nettles.
I want to be careful about what these records do — and do not — show.
Texas Health and Human Services records show that Haven of Purpose entered voluntary suspension beginning July 23, 2024. During that suspension, the operation was specifically required not to care for children. The suspension ultimately resulted in the operation being closed on April 17, 2026.
HHSC records from 2025 repeatedly show zero children enrolled, zero staff employed, and that the provider was not caring for children.
Yet public-facing materials have continued to describe Haven of Purpose as an ongoing childcare operation. Councilmember Nettles’ campaign materials state that he has “owned and operated” Haven of Purpose since 2014, while the ministry website continued to advertise daycare hours.
There is also a financial-disclosure question.
Councilmember Nettles’ 2026 Personal Financial Statement, which covers calendar year 2025, identifies him as self-employed and lists his occupation as: “Owner of Childcare & Afterschool.”
That statement, standing alone, does not prove anything improper. Someone can still own a business, receive income, or conduct related business activity even when a licensed childcare operation is suspended.
But when HHSC records show no children enrolled, no staff employed, and no childcare being provided during 2025, I believe taxpayers are entitled to ask a simple question:
What childcare or afterschool business activity was Councilmember Nettles reporting during 2025?
I want to emphasize something important: the records also show that Haven of Purpose was, at various times, a legitimate licensed childcare operation. I am not claiming otherwise. Nor am I accusing Councilmember Nettles of fraud, perjury, or any crime.
I am simply comparing what the public records say with what the public has been told.
Public officials should be able to answer reasonable questions about statements made on official websites, campaign materials, and sworn financial disclosures.
If Councilmember Nettles has an explanation that reconciles these records, I believe he should have every opportunity to provide it.
This is not about personalities. It is about transparency, accountability, and making sure the public record is accurate.
Out of respect for Mr. Nettles privacy I will not post the records here. They will be available upon request.