08/18/2026
I had to miss the last council meeting due to a prior commitment. It bothers me to miss a meeting. I donât foresee missing any more.
Disclaimer: I do not speak on behalf of the city of Hillsboro. All opinions and summaries are my own, based on publicly available information.
That being said, a rundown of some recent business, old and new.
At the council meeting before last, council had a first reading for increasing residential building permit fees. The second reading occurred at this meeting. Iâm still looking into the numbers. How much cost the state has passed on to us, how much weâre spending, on what, etc. The measure will move to a third reading next month where it will be voted on.
A second reading was heard on the social media policy for the city page. It was sent to committee to clear up some language in the original ordinance and remove some language that was a bit restrictive on elected officials. That being said, I feel much better about the policy and how it allows the city to operate the page as an outlet for information and citizens to ask on-topic questions, while preventing comments that would be off-topic, spam, malware, discriminatory on the basis of categories listed in the civil rights act, derogatory or perverse, obscene, threats to any person, solicitations. It will move to a third reading and vote next meeting.
The big topic of the evening was sewer rates. To try and make it as simple as possible, the cityâs sewer infrastructure is old, deteriorating, and allowing too much storm water into the sewer system. Itâs causing backups, wash-outs, and overflows that put the city in violation of the EPA and negatively impact citizens. The question isnât whether this project needs done: it is known that it needs done. The question is the best method to pay for it. I have been working on the issue quite a bit. Iâve had many discussions with the auditor, safety service director, sewer plant superintendent, and officials from OWDA (who gives us loans for projects like these), and other members of council. Itâs a multi-million dollar project ($15-20 million, about $4 million per phase), one that many local governments are having to do to update their outdated sewer infrastructure. Council has been told the city is pursuing as much grant money as possible to pay for the project, but grants are never a certainty. The question is, is it possible to use a combination of grants and long-term loans to finance the project? Grants obviously reduce the cost the city must pay from its revenues. Long-term loans might allow the city to gradually and incrementally increase sewer rates over a much longer term (several decades) than currently proposed so as to minimize the impact on citizens. Iâve been encouraged by my discussions with members of council of their commitment to do the same. These discussions are ongoing, and hopefully will lead the city to a solid balance to get the project done. Part of these discussions should be a thorough review of the sewer budget and expenditures as well. While I was unable to attend the meeting, I have spent quite a bit of time outside of the meeting researching and gathering information.