One World Government

12/05/2018

For the 'likers', who I like very much ✌🙏👍

Found on Google from dailymail.co.uk

12/05/2018

Hello to the people that 'liked' this page. It was great to find some independently minded caring people that wanted to express support for ideas that can change the way things are. You are some special beings in my eyes...you weren't 'invited' to like the page..that is so artificial to me..you chose to..I was really lifted to the heavens to see that. Thank you all

06/03/2018

I am going to digress from the earlier discourse with an important safeguard announcement in the form of hypothetical....as you may have recognised from earlier outlines..I had thought that wealth redistribution was the driving force that had status of primacy, that's what I will call it...however a 360 view of inter-related but separate forces has made an alternative danger to the world surface..it may eclipse earlier issues..I just want to outline the mechanics in case I have landed on a thing much more exploisive..still relevant to One World Government yes..but a lot more urgency would attach..if even partially correct..it is possible I am adding up wrong..but the more I look the more I wonder..so obviously..as before my views are not the ones that in the end count..others that comment, critic will know where this goes..they have more details, information and insights than little me. If I get laughed out, no worries..but for me..it would be great..when I put rough concept drawings out for debate..the majority will provide for me..a gauge of if it is in any way wrong or right...I will feel like I have done what is comfortable for me, because the cost to me of being thought silly doesn't compare to a wake up call if there is an organised and sinister under-belly type thing...that was being used to hurt nations and peoples like never before..if it isn't like that great..I don't want to find out national government is not protecting people, as the majority believe..and as good people hope..it is ironic that people said they were against One World Government because the feared they would either..two sides of the coin.. not be protected..or alternatively that they would be taken advantage of by government organised corruption..on such a grand scale as to rob entire nations..well what if these national governments are organised and robbing nations people's right now..while we are all sat there thinking they are keeping us safe? Some later examples will put meat on the bones..but currently our public belief in their uprightness might be being used as effective cover for the most vicious scamming of nation's peoples that has ever occurred, in a hidden organised co-ordinated extraction of wealth through corruption off a vast magnitude..the pay-day so good that it has been able to kept out of the public domain? Anyway I will do, as I say some hypotheticals later and hope that people better than me can confirm correct add to or otherwise engage with them to give their impressions of whether such scenarios could either be real, now or ever..whether they happen here or in any nations atm or whether they feel nations governments are all bona-fide..with no need or benefit to have a One World Government police them, to ensure they aren't actually hurting their nation's peoples, with either full scope systemic corruption..or else schemes in pockets of the national administrations perhaps...
Anyway before I stop this preamble now..just think for a moment..on gut feeling..do you think any governments of nations might do the wrong thing..or is it more likely that no..they are all getting it right and not scamming...politicians aren't they...do you feel safe with them? Who checks on them? They put out information about their performance to us..no outside overseeing currently..relying on them too much or no..they are fine..when I come back to for instances later..open minds can be more of use than the closed..but don't worry about being delicate with my feelings..if you feel it has no merit..slam it by all means..it is fine..it won't hurt. If there are things people actually know..that go either way..that is really the gold for me aye..as I said it is a slight related but still detour on the development of One World Government..I will get back to that, after this. Thank you everyone that even has a look..if you talk on it in addition..that is so very kind..even if it is just to shoot it down, I would be very glad of your comments like that too.

06/02/2018

So globalisation..demon monster! Ahhrr
No..not at all. The term has been used in a variety of concepts, so people have differences in their heads about what it means..I also believe for some..they aren't absolutely exactly sure...and even though they aren't quite clear on what it means..I feel a bunch of people, don't really care or have interest of concern to know..because they have a f8rm yet vague and general notion..that it doesn't really actually matter .because, they know and have heard the dominant minority view..that they feel they belong too..thinks it's bad..it is a monster amongst their people group..they identify with being in the dominant majority people group..and theif groups hates it..they are conditioned to shoot the word globalisation down on first hearing..that is actually a bit funny really. No we don't know what it is..but it is bad (that much they do know..which is non-sensical..if reasoning logically were the marker stick - happy days for us..logic is yes, a part of how we will likely get a solution..but it is not top dog. Top dog is perception

06/02/2018

On to clarifications that may be reasons for fear or non-a cceptance of the One World Government.

I got 3 to open up here, I think..
1. Globalization..is it seems scariest. So we will run that out a bit
2. That a central OWG will allow small clicks of power-mongers to dominate, manipulate and control people in dome wacky shake down
3. That a central government will necessitate the demise of small business enterprise in local areas.

06/02/2018

So let's talk about certainty now. People certain of world being flat..was replaced by people certain world round.
I don't like phrasing that people were wrong about flat and changed..it is negative conception, feels critical?
I prefer to express it as views may have evolved or were reshaped by discussion, new information...attitudes shifted. I just found out Australia Day has only been going since 1994? Oh..for me I would have attitudinal thought it had been certain forever or to tie back in..it felt certain to me..clearly now I see what can appear certain is very capable of becoming the polar opposite: uncertain

I thought that interesting to get a person's mind loosend up..to make what was strongly viewed (even by a dominant majority) as possibly in some way a lot less certain than before

06/02/2018

Hello peps! In convos elsewhere it is apart there's angst in the main at suggestion of One World Government from people in the majority. After hearing some of their points..I kinda started to think the Super-rich elitest controllers of 90% share of world wealth have been running smear campaigns, in subtle ways, to create fear at apprehension of a One World Government.. smart if they did as a multi-nationals best friend is contknued nationalistic government of course..because if they don't like one nations terms or lack of aquiessence, they just go on to next please..going around till they find a nation prepared to bow down to them..capitulation achieved..profit engines fire and roar.
Multi-national corporations..that term itself, and term globalisation strike fear in the hearts of enterprising potential small business starters..is what one fear or concern may be that's a live issue in having a negative impact on what the general population consider are worries for a One World Government.
I am going to take a stab that different ideas have been lumped together in a negative monster of a concept..which is causing people to be repelled from even a start-up consideration of the One World Government plan or notion.
If we split up the parts of this mythical monster, could that tske out fear and rejection feelings espoused at first mention of One World Government? That is something to try anyway..I think it could help..but when you are for something..sometimes it is hard to see why others feel resistance to it or and reject it.
I don't think that I have expressed the idea with sufficient clarity, to allow those against it to gain the meaning od operation of the One World Goverment proposition..I will see if I can shake the tree on this miscommunication, to see if people are better able to distinguidh One World Government concept..I propose to the as I see it entirely different notions that they say are fears embodied in my suggestion.

To start I will say..I do not believe the monsters that scare them are in my One World Governmdnt notion, neither do J think they would come in as a ridk in a One World Government either.
Also my views are not the dominant or top-dog view I acknowledge wiyh the majority of people being solid no..that is the most important view of course.
Aside I was thinking of the world before it was fully mapped. The prevailing notion, was at the time that the world was flat. The main view would have laughed when the first man said it was round. Round earth is now accepted dominant view.

This shows us that ideas once thought to be fixed bedrock notions have been changed before and that shows they can change again too, doesn't it?

So even firmly held view of majority that nationalistic govertments are forever, really are not..in our minds they feel fixed immovable, unable to be subjected to alteration..but what I show you (flat-round) shows you otherwise eh.

05/27/2018

Resistance from critics, in response, is greatfully received

05/11/2018

“A Glimpse into the Future” is a podcast series that gives you access to ideas and insights of some of the world’s greatest experts. In this week’s interview, we talk with Toomas Hendrik Ilves, forme

05/09/2018

Se encontró en Google desde pinterest.com

05/02/2018

Fat people are victims of sugar and food industry's conspiracy to addict them to sugar to increase their profits, as the addicts are of course much better customers....

Have things gone further?

Fat people cost 40% more in the medical system, compared to a thin person or normal person

Bariatric surgery could be being used as a population control to target least efficient medical users...the medicare system would appear likely to collaspe...perhaps we have reached a time when cost cutters have elected to take executive covert action to prevent the collaspe?

A cursory inspection of the 3 operations performed...appeared to turn a normally functioning body into a body that can no longer process food correctly...they were unable to process fat so as to gain nutrition-calorie energy.

I saw a mum saying her daughter died from starvation..she had the surgery and was eating but could not process food for energy

Their bodies couldn't process fat anyway more

PH changed in their urinary track seemed to permit, conditions of disease.

Many medical problems beset them consequent to surgery...some had to have re-operation..some died in the first week after surgery..some after 5 years

Post-op patients experienced complications in the immediacy after the op, others 5 years after

The death figures appeared to exclude many deaths on flim-flam excuses...poor post-operative car...so patients should be aware that 'scape-goat' tactics such as these are used to colour the statistics more favorably for doctors.

Are surgeons riding the gravy train..they charge $13,000 for the surgery and the doctor has a paying job with them then ongoing - again that is the appearance anyway

They guilt patients into surgery..then blame the patient for poor outcomes..it seems once more?

Renal failure risk, would be one risk..that I would want explained to me particularly...patients could die from kidney's being compromised..their are increased outputs of some discharges.

Are fat people being culled to allow administrators to maintain a guise of medical systems being able to cope..to pretend funding and spending are able to be balanced...are covert measures of a draconian nature being employed to eliminate cost blow-outs that might undermine public confidence in the system?

Why not tax the sugar industry for the consequent medical costs of sugar addiction that the industry has induced...poor fat people have been manipulated like sheep through their pump-up media and food-processing methods..putting secret and unnecessary sugar in bacon..chicken..any damn thing and everything..sugar tax for diabetic health costs? Sounds right to me..cause and effect?

Surgery is risking innocents lives...they should make sure to have their affairs in order...emergency medical care is notoriously less-error prone than routine as I understand it...I wonder if a candidate for surgery contemplates funeral costs...life insurance too - taking out, or increases

Surgery fees of $13,000 might overcome ethical qualms about inducing high risk candidates to get surgery...it does not seem to be a big pay to me to take a man's life..to take a husband from a wife..to take a dearly loved father from his son..medical talk or spin around the fat patient being responsible for greatly shortened life spans - appear to me to be, being used as some kind of 'get-out-of-jail-free card' in the event of the surgery killing them...that in its self seems highly suspicious to me?? They have all the teflon arguments prepared and in place to deflect blame from themselves and to massage death figures..I don't like the look of how allof this is adding up at all..there is something very, very wrong with all of this...medical 'professionals'..claiming to be in the 'business''of çare-giving'? Appear to have their arguments. media story-spins prepared like politicians and corporate tax dodgers..are more efforts spent to deflect attention away from questions being asked about the ethics of doing surgery on fat people...BMI's of 50 and operating on them..wth!

Answer this medical professionals exactly princely sums of fat people for life-endangerment...if yo locked them down in jail-like care facilities...restricting nutritional intake..isn't it the case they would loose weight..with no risk to life and a heavily reduced dollar cost..and it would be 100% effective too..wouldn't it? Murderous carry-on you appear to be engaged in is outrageous....breach of your medical oath is it? Does class action and professional indemnity insurance get your attention if tears of children who have lost their father's doesn't?

Don't wait for administrators..omudsmen..overseers to correct the system..you are doing these surgeries..STOP!!

What the hell are you thinking? I would be feeling pretty nervous right about now if I was you guys?

You ever listen to the little voice inside do you? Or are you bought and paid for to be complicit in one of the most terrible crimes being perpetuated against humanity by modern day administration systems that have the audacity to call themselves 'Governments' and 'democracies' at that!!

Is this all sounding perfectly reasonable to anyone at all that is able to draw breath?

Governing is it? Ha destroyers of beloved people...democracy? Ha ruling for 'the people'? OMG yeah we want you to cull us so you can maintain your pretence of a medical system that is economically viable...you first eh? If fat people cannot sustain projected cost savings you require.. do you plan to add in other costly target groups such as old people? What about dementia sufferers? Perhaps they could be a soft-target too..they would struggle to know what's going on? Of course..you could just cut to the chase and only allow a medical system to care for healthy people..you could keep costs right down then eh?

Hello?? Anyone there? Or are you all out on tea-break people? Is this okay with everyone? I really want to know? Is this the world you want? Does callous disregard mean anything to anyone..you just going to sit back and let this go on till your head is on the chopping block?

SOS....SOS....SOS