Comments
sure I'll like your page I love the Police even though I live in Trinity County Were all Texans and back all blue uniforms
4:25 AM (20 hours ago)
to jason.mcdaniel, cody.davis
HCCO PCT 5 CFS REFUSAL x 3 / FAIL TO ID x 2 / OATH VIOLATIONS
Lt. Jason Scott McDaniel:
I am an American w/disabilities. I called HPD @ 713.884.3131 many times only to find the number busy each time. On or about 07/04/20 @ approximately 22:27, 22:29 & 22:33 hours I called my HCCO Pct 5 dispatch @ 832.927.6700 about multiple shooting disturbances outside of my home.
A female dispatcher believed to be Angela ..? answered & refused service based on my Pct 5 address citing that I was not in a contracted area. I advised her that HPD was busy the last hour+ & not to hang up on me or transfer me. I asked for her to ID herself, she refused, slammed the phone down & transferred me to the busy HPD line.
I called right back. A male answered. I asked for the identity of the female working in dispatch for accountability purposes. He ignored my question & tried to refocus me onto the original call. He reluctantly gave me 'Angela' & 'Eric' after repeated requests. Ultimately the dispatcher believed to be Eric failed to properly ID himself or his coworker & denied my CFS request. I asked for the Sgt on duty to return my call.
Sgt Davis called me from 832.927.6777 @ 20:41 hours & the Angela / Eric pattern was repeated. I had trouble getting him to ID properly, he refused to properly ID both dispatchers & cited the same CFS refusal of service based on the address not being in a contract area. I told him that I pay HC taxes, HCCO Pct 5 is a primary LE agent w/concurrent jurisdiction & that contracts grant no disparagement of LE services. I told him that he must come & serve when summoned by ANY Pct 5 constituent, failure to ID by a public servant is a crime, & to have his Lt contact me. I asked Sgt Davis for his HCCO Pct 5 email address. He refused. I researched & found it despite his refusal of public information. Sgt Davis was not disrespectful to me like the dispatchers were.
SPECIFIC ALLEGATIONS:
CFS refusal to serve x 3
Refusal to ID x 2
Multiple oath violations
REFERENCES:
Constables were the first Law Enforcement Officers in Texas. ... In 1836, the Constitution of THE REPUBLIC OF TEXAS established Constables as primary Law Enforcement Administrators, whose stature is still upheld today under article 2.12 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
Texas Penal Code § 39.03. Official Oppression
(a) A public servant acting under color of his office or employment commits an offense if he:
(1) intentionally subjects another to mistreatment or to arrest, detention, search, seizure, dispossession, assessment, or lien that he knows is unlawful;
(2) intentionally denies or impedes another in the exercise or enjoyment of any right, privilege, power, or immunity, knowing his conduct is unlawful; or
(3) intentionally subjects another to sexual harassment.
(b) For purposes of this section, a public servant acts under color of his office or employment if he acts or purports to act in an official capacity or takes advantage of such actual or purported capacity.
(c) In this section, “sexual harassment” means unwelcome sexual advances, requests for sexual favors, or other verbal or physical conduct of a sexual nature, submission to which is made a term or condition of a person's exercise or enjoyment of any right, privilege, power, or immunity, either explicitly or implicitly.
(d) An offense under this section is a Class A misdemeanor, except that an offense is a felony of the third degree if the public servant acted with the intent to impair the accuracy of data reported to the Texas Education Agency through the Public Education Information Management System (PEIMS) described by Sections 48.008 and 48.009 Section 42.006, Education Code , under a law requiring that reporting.
McDaniel, Jason Scott (Constable Precinct 5)
6:02 AM (19 hours ago)
to me
I will look into your complaint when I return to work. I appreciate you bringing this to my attention.
Lt. Jason McDaniel
McDaniel, Jason Scott (Constable Precinct 5)
6:05 AM (19 hours ago)
to me
I forgot to ask you what your address is? This will help me better investigate your complaint.
Lt. Jason McDaniel
Sent from my iPhone
On Jul 5, 2020, at 6:02 AM, McDaniel, Jason Scott (Constable Precinct 5) wrote:
I will look into your complaint when I return to work. I appreciate you bringing this to my attention.
11:38 PM (1 hour ago) to mitchell.hutter
Cpt. Mitchell Hutter:
I'm just off w/Lt. Jason Scott McDaniel. He was loud, self assured, ignorant of the law, ignorant of his responsibilities, disrespectful & refused to allow me to talk uninteruptted. He hung up on me.
--
4:25 AM (19 hours ago)
to jason.mcdaniel, cody.davis
HCCO PCT 5 CFS REFUSAL x 3 / FAIL TO ID x 2 / OATH VIOLATIONS
Lt. Jason Scott McDaniel:
I am an American w/disabilities. I called HPD @ 713.884.3131 many times only to find the number busy each time. On or about 07/04/20 @ approximately 22:27, 22:29 & 22:33 hours I called my HCCO Pct 5 dispatch @ 832.927.6700 about multiple shooting disturbances outside of my home.
A female dispatcher believed to be Angela ..? answered & refused service based on my Pct 5 address citing that I was not in a contracted area. I advised her that HPD was busy the last hour+ & not to hang up on me or transfer me. I asked for her to ID herself, she refused, slammed the phone down & transferred me to the busy HPD line.
I called right back. A male answered. I asked for the identity of the female working in dispatch for accountability purposes. He ignored my question & tried to refocus me onto the original call. He reluctantly gave me 'Angela' & 'Eric' after repeated requests. Ultimately the dispatcher believed to be Eric failed to properly ID himself or his coworker & denied my CFS request. I asked for the Sgt on duty to return my call.
Sgt Davis called me from 832.927.6777 @ 20:41 hours & the Angela / Eric pattern was repeated. I had trouble getting him to ID properly, he refused to properly ID both dispatchers & cited the same CFS refusal of service based on the address not being in a contract area. I told him that I pay HC taxes, HCCO Pct 5 is a primary LE agent w/concurrent jurisdiction & that contracts grant no disparagement of LE services. I told him that he must come & serve when summoned by ANY Pct 5 constituent, failure to ID by a public servant is a crime, & to have his Lt contact me. I asked Sgt Davis for his HCCO Pct 5 email address. He refused. I researched & found it despite his refusal of public information. Sgt Davis was not disrespectful to me like the dispatchers were.
SPECIFIC ALLEGATIONS:
CFS refusal to serve x 3
Refusal to ID x 2
Multiple oath violations
REFERENCES:
Constables were the first Law Enforcement Officers in Texas. ... In 1836, the Constitution of THE REPUBLIC OF TEXAS established Constables as primary Law Enforcement Administrators, whose stature is still upheld today under article 2.12 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
Texas Penal Code § 39.03. Official Oppression
(a) A public servant acting under color of his office or employment commits an offense if he:
(1) intentionally subjects another to mistreatment or to arrest, detention, search, seizure, dispossession, assessment, or lien that he knows is unlawful;
(2) intentionally denies or impedes another in the exercise or enjoyment of any right, privilege, power, or immunity, knowing his conduct is unlawful; or
(3) intentionally subjects another to sexual harassment.
(b) For purposes of this section, a public servant acts under color of his office or employment if he acts or purports to act in an official capacity or takes advantage of such actual or purported capacity.
(c) In this section, “sexual harassment” means unwelcome sexual advances, requests for sexual favors, or other verbal or physical conduct of a sexual nature, submission to which is made a term or condition of a person's exercise or enjoyment of any right, privilege, power, or immunity, either explicitly or implicitly.
(d) An offense under this section is a Class A misdemeanor, except that an offense is a felony of the third degree if the public servant acted with the intent to impair the accuracy of data reported to the Texas Education Agency through the Public Education Information Management System (PEIMS) described by Sections 48.008 and 48.009 Section 42.006, Education Code , under a law requiring that reporting.
McDaniel, Jason Scott (Constable Precinct 5)
6:02 AM (17 hours ago)
to me
I will look into your complaint when I return to work. I appreciate you bringing this to my attention.
Lt. Jason McDaniel
Sent from my iPhone
On Jul 5, 2020, at 4:26 AM, PAUL A. RHODES, SR. wrote:
McDaniel, Jason Scott (Constable Precinct 5)
6:05 AM (17 hours ago)
to me
I forgot to ask you what your address is? This will help me better investigate your complaint.
Lt. Jason McDaniel
Sent from my iPhone
On Jul 5, 2020, at 6:02 AM, McDaniel, Jason Scott (Constable Precinct 5) wrote:
I will look into your complaint when I return to work. I appreciate you bringing this to my attention.
11:38 PM (1 minute ago)
to mitchell.hutter
Cpt. Mitchell Hutter:
I'm just off w/Lt. Jason Scott McDaniel. He was loud, self assured, ignorant of the law, ignorant of his responsibilities, disrespectful & refused to allow me to talk uninteruptted. He hung up on me.
--
PAUL A. RHODES, SR. Sun, Jul 5, 2020 at 4:25 AM
To:
[email protected],
[email protected]
HCCO PCT 5 CFS REFUSAL x 3 / FAIL TO ID x 2 / OATH VIOLATIONS
Lt. Jason Scott McDaniel:
I am an American w/disabilities. I called HPD @ 713.884.3131 many times only to find the number busy each time. On or about 07/04/20 @ approximately 22:27, 22:29 & 22:33 hours I called my HCCO Pct 5 dispatch @ 832.927.6700 about multiple shooting disturbances outside of my home.
A female dispatcher believed to be Angela ..? answered & refused service based on my Pct 5 address citing that I was not in a contracted area. I advised her that HPD was busy the last hour+ & not to hang up on me or transfer me. I asked for her to ID herself, she refused, slammed the phone down & transferred me to the busy HPD line.
I called right back. A male answered. I asked for the identity of the female working in dispatch for accountability purposes. He ignored my question & tried to refocus me onto the original call. He reluctantly gave me 'Angela' & 'Eric' after repeated requests. Ultimately the dispatcher believed to be Eric failed to properly ID himself or his coworker & denied my CFS request. I asked for the Sgt on duty to return my call.
Sgt Davis called me from 832.927.6777 @ 20:41 hours & the Angela / Eric pattern was repeated. I had trouble getting him to ID properly, he refused to properly ID both dispatchers & cited the same CFS refusal of service based on the address not being in a contract area. I told him that I pay HC taxes, HCCO Pct 5 is a primary LE agent w/concurrent jurisdiction & that contracts grant no disparagement of LE services. I told him that he must come & serve when summoned by ANY Pct 5 constituent, failure to ID by a public servant is a crime, & to have his Lt contact me. I asked Sgt Davis for his HCCO Pct 5 email address. He refused. I researched & found it despite his refusal of public information. Sgt Davis was not disrespectful to me like the dispatchers were.
SPECIFIC ALLEGATIONS:
CFS refusal to serve x 3
Refusal to ID x 2
Multiple oath violations
REFERENCES:
Constables were the first Law Enforcement Officers in Texas. ... In 1836, the Constitution of THE REPUBLIC OF TEXAS established Constables as primary Law Enforcement Administrators, whose stature is still upheld today under article 2.12 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
Texas Penal Code § 39.03. Official Oppression
(a) A public servant acting under color of his office or employment commits an offense if he:
(1) intentionally subjects another to mistreatment or to arrest, detention, search, seizure, dispossession, assessment, or lien that he knows is unlawful;
(2) intentionally denies or impedes another in the exercise or enjoyment of any right, privilege, power, or immunity, knowing his conduct is unlawful; or
(3) intentionally subjects another to sexual harassment.
(b) For purposes of this section, a public servant acts under color of his office or employment if he acts or purports to act in an official capacity or takes advantage of such actual or purported capacity.
(c) In this section, “sexual harassment” means unwelcome sexual advances, requests for sexual favors, or other verbal or physical conduct of a sexual nature, submission to which is made a term or condition of a person's exercise or enjoyment of any right, privilege, power, or immunity, either explicitly or implicitly.
(d) An offense under this section is a Class A misdemeanor, except that an offense is a felony of the third degree if the public servant acted with the intent to impair the accuracy of data reported to the Texas Education Agency through the Public Education Information Management System (PEIMS) described by Sections 48.008 and 48.009 Section 42.006, Education Code , under a law requiring that reporting.
McDaniel, Jason Scott (Constable Precinct 5) Sun, Jul 5, 2020 at 6:02 AM
To: "PAUL A. RHODES, SR."
I will look into your complaint when I return to work. I appreciate you bringing this to my attention.
Lt. Jason McDaniel
Sent from my iPhone
On Jul 5, 2020, at 4:26 AM, PAUL A. RHODES, SR. wrote:
[Quoted text hidden]
McDaniel, Jason Scott (Constable Precinct 5) Sun, Jul 5, 2020 at 6:05 AM
To: "PAUL A. RHODES, SR."
I forgot to ask you what your address is? This will help me better investigate your complaint.
Lt. Jason McDaniel
Sent from my iPhone
On Jul 5, 2020, at 6:02 AM, McDaniel, Jason Scott (Constable Precinct 5) wrote:
I will look into your complaint when I return to work. I appreciate you bringing this to my attention.
[Quoted text hidden]