08/18/2026
In response to several calls and emails I have received from concerned citizens in our community, I decided to write this and explain where I stand. I have spent a lot of time thinking about what happened at last night’s city council meeting, and I have some serious concerns. For months, we worked on a data center ordinance designed to protect Joplin. We addressed water, power, noise, environmental protections, infrastructure, setbacks, and surrounding property owners. Then, at the last minute, a motion was made to double the residential setback from 300 feet to 600 feet. I believe this was a substantial change to the ordinance. Section 2.12 of the Joplin Charter specifically addresses an amendment that constitutes a “change in substance.” When that happens, the Charter requires the amended bill to remain on file with the city clerk for an additional week and another opportunity for a public hearing before final action. That raises a legitimate question about whether doubling this setback should have triggered that process. The amendment passed 5-4, and I voted no.
The vote on the data center ordinance was 5-4:
**Voted YES**
* Rob O’Brian
* Keenan Cortez
* Josh DeTar
* Eli Moran
* Chuck Copple
**Voted NO**
* Brian Cowles
* Mary Price
* Josh Bard
* Ryan Jackson
Since the meeting, I have even more questions. Why was an argument about setbacks made publicly earlier that same day so similar to the argument later made from the dais? Why were conversations about this issue taking place before the meeting involving individual council members and others while the full council was not part of those discussions? Why was such a substantial change made at the last minute when there is pending litigation against the city involving related issues? Why are council members now questioning their vote and whether they fully understood what they were voting for? Why did we double the setback from 300 feet to 600 feet without fully understanding what that could mean for the project? Why didn't we first determine whether this could hurt the city's ability to negotiate with the eventual end user, affect our position in pending litigation, or even cause the property owner to consider deannexation?
I have asked questions because I believe these are questions that need to be answered. The problem is, I am asking questions and I am not receiving answers. That is frustrating, especially when we are dealing with decisions that could have significant consequences for Joplin. After what I have learned since the vote, I have more questions today than I did last night, and I intend to keep asking until I get answers.