06/06/2026
June 3 was Cecily Myart-Cruz’s last UTLA House of Representatives (HoR) to chair - and boy was it a doozy!
The first hour wasn’t so unusual but there was a different parliamentarian, Tami Dunning, there in place of Lorenzo Cuesta. I asked why no Lorenzo and for an introduction to Tami. UTLA Secretary Jennifer McAfee explained Lorenzo had a family engagement he couldn’t get out of, 6pm to 9pm. What a coincidence, I thought, because when I’d sent in a complaint on him, 5 weeks earlier, I needed his address but couldn’t find any listing for him on parliamentarians.org. I assumed he’d lost his credential. Stay tuned.
Tami was introduced and she did upstanding work.
I asked a parliamentarian question about the last meeting. That when debate occurs on a motion it should be about the motion and not the author. I explained how Wil Page said negative things about me during the debate on my motion, even flipping me off.
Cecily said Tami wouldn’t know much about that since she didn’t attend the prior meeting. She continued, asking if I wanted Wil to apologize.
I said that there’d been too many apologies and it made things toxic. Cecily quoted back some of my Facebook post on the NEA/CTA Service Center and became quite animated.
While Wil confessed to flipping me off, many heart emojis floated up the screen. However, he ended by saying his hand gesture in no way came close to the harm I had caused UTLA, and referred to the NEA/CTA Service Center meeting 6 days prior.
And Cecily too concluded that I needed to be more careful in how I spoke since I offended so many at the NEA/CTA Service Center meeting the previous week.
I believe a member of the HoR, Andrea Shaloo, expressed discomfort in how Cecily had been addressing me, even though she was sure there was a history of grievances against me. I guess it was her first time seeing how the HoR treats me as their target of blame.
Cecily thanked her but soon Mallorie Evans spoke and told Andrea that my offenses were innumerable, with all of my racism and doubling down. How I get off on the discord I bring. How she has never seen me do any real work for UTLA. And before Andrea should chastise Cecily, she needs to get the full backstory.
I wonder how long before Andrea speaks up again? 🤔
Chris Wenell wanted my undertones and innuendo addressed because I had been using “brother” and “sister” and more racism must be at the bottom of that. I guess he is unfortunately unfamiliar with the use of those words within unionism.
At no time did any of these many people question the endless charges of racism and some charges of misogyny against me. They are accepted facts in UTLA. The Sun rises in the East and Greg Russell is a racist. The Sun sets in the West and Greg Russell is a misogynist.
Maybe a half hour later, Luis Mora said he wanted Amy Leserman removed from the meeting because she made him and others feel unsafe. This is where Tami was made to work in finding the correct way to handle this problem. Several spoke against Amy. Scott Mandel tried to have due process observed. His cautioning of a slippery slope that could also get me, Greg Russell, removed in the future, failed to get any support. Naturally.
After about 30 minutes, it went to a vote. Cecily dismissed my party popper, which signals a question or a point of order. I wanted there to be debate and a chance for Amy to speak. Amy was ejected.
Cecily was dismayed at how this could have happened. After her encouraging the past few years of apologies for anyone’s feeling offended, and earlier in this very meeting saying how bad I was for offending others, while love was given to the person that flipped me off, Cecily couldn’t figure out why the big hubbub over this offensive person needing to be removed.
Cecily, UTLA, and all union brothers and sisters, the reasons for Amy Leserman’s removal are likely her equating pro-Palestinian with anti-Jew. Conversely, the HoR members asking for her removal are likely equating her pro-Jew with anti-Palestinian. Both sides are adept at pointing out the other’s faults but neither is adept at self-criticism.
When it comes to my treatment within UTLA, it’s a matter of my holding Truth above all else. This can shake both the pro-Black bias and unquestioning loyalty to authority figures in our union. The charges against me are easily dismissed when objectively judged against the facts. However, that takes a dedication to selflessness, which requires effort. It’s much easier to follow your feelings.
Advancing the principles and practice of democratic decision-making. NAP serves the needs of today’s parliamentarians. Learn more