Act for Missouri

Act for Missouri Act for Missouri is an online resource for Missouri Conservatives looking for ways to get involved.

This is Bryant Wolfin for State Representative, last summer, in the first special session on the Stadium Bill, right bef...
06/01/2026

This is Bryant Wolfin for State Representative, last summer, in the first special session on the Stadium Bill, right before it was rammed through. He was the strongest voice against this giveaway to billionaires. As the campaign season cranks up, we are going to remind people of what good representation looks like and what they should expect from those who ask for their votes on August 4th.

In this compelling video, Representative Bryant Wolfin delivers an impassioned address to the Missouri House, urging his colleagues to honor the oath they swore to uphold. Recorded moments before the

Great interview! If you live in District 140, you really must check this out. Educate yourself on your choices for Augus...
06/01/2026

Great interview! If you live in District 140, you really must check this out. Educate yourself on your choices for August 4th. You have a chance to make a real statement to the establishment!
https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1CrBqNe7TH/

Wanetta and Kevin Have a conversation About the Jefferson City Swamp and speak with MO District 140 Representative Candidate, Angela Romine.Comment below!Fol...

There’s been a lot of talk about us lately claims saying we are a pseudo conservative group backed by leftist money. Whi...
05/31/2026

There’s been a lot of talk about us lately claims saying we are a pseudo conservative group backed by leftist money. Which we find to be hilarious and lead us to publishing the following article.

What do you think? Are we getting big conservatives things done? Is it party over principle? Are we the party of false choices? Is it a uniparty?

Grassroots conservatives are tired of being told to applaud half-measures, bad process, and government expansion just because Republicans are selling it.

05/29/2026

Ding
Ding
Ding
🎯🙌

Some people ask why Act for Missouri is so hard on Republicans.The answer is simple: because this is our party too.We ar...
05/28/2026

Some people ask why Act for Missouri is so hard on Republicans.

The answer is simple: because this is our party too.

We are Republicans. We are conservatives. We are pro-life, pro-Constitution, pro-family, pro-liberty, pro-taxpayer, and pro-transparency.

We are not criticizing from the Left. We are holding our own party to the principles it claims to stand for.

And in Missouri, Republicans are not powerless.

They have the Governor’s office. They have every statewide office. They have supermajorities in both chambers. They have had a rare opportunity to deliver real conservative results.

So when the results do not match the promises, who exactly are citizens supposed to hold accountable?

We are not hard on Republicans because we want Democrats in charge.

We are hard on Republicans because we do not want the Democrat agenda advanced under a Republican label.

We are hard on Republicans because campaign promises should mean something.

We are hard on Republicans because the party platform should mean something.

We are hard on Republicans because the Constitution should mean something.

We are hard on Republicans because “this is the best we can do” is not good enough when our party controls the state.

Half-measures are not victories.

Blank checks are not tax reform.

Secrecy is not economic development.

Audio-only government is not transparency.

Higher utility bills are not conservative policy.

Republican branding does not make a bill conservative.

Accountability is not division. Discernment is not betrayal. Refusing to clap for failure is not helping the Left.

This is why we wrote our latest article:

The Missouri GOP Has Become the Party of False Choices

Read it here:

Grassroots conservatives are tired of being told to applaud half-measures, bad process, and government expansion just because Republicans are selling it.

Please support Jake Jackson's petition to prevent flock cameras! This is a county-by-county fight right now, but we all ...
05/28/2026

Please support Jake Jackson's petition to prevent flock cameras! This is a county-by-county fight right now, but we all need to be helping each other block them!

Ban Flock cameras in Saint Charles County, Missouri

For years, Missourians have been saying the same thing: it's too easy to permanently change our State Constitution. Stop...
05/28/2026

For years, Missourians have been saying the same thing: it's too easy to permanently change our State Constitution. Stop letting out-of-state money drive radical amendments into our founding document.

That was the frustration. That was the call for reform.

So what did our GOP supermajority do with it? They used it against us.

Amendment 4 doesn't make it harder to amend the Constitution for everyone. It makes it nearly impossible for the PEOPLE — while the legislature keeps its same easy path. Simple majority. No extra hoops. Business as usual for Jefferson City.

Missourians wanted constitutional amendment reform. They got initiative petition elimination. Those are not the same thing.

And here's the part they don't want to talk about: if Democrats ever retake the General Assembly, they can still put gun control, abortion language, or anything else on the ballot through the legislature's path — with no district-by-district requirement. Amendment 4 doesn't protect the Constitution from radical change. It just decides who gets to make the changes. And the answer is: whoever controls Jefferson City.

The same supermajority that couldn't rein in spending, stop runaway property taxes, or deliver on conservative priorities for a decade somehow found the urgency to lock in their own power. They heard the people's frustration — and turned it into a power grab.

We believe it should be harder to amend our Constitution. For everyone. Including the legislature. This amendment doesn't do that.

We're a NO Vote on Amendment 4. Read or listen to find out why.

🔗 Read the full article:

Missouri's Amendment 4 doesn't protect voters — it removes the people's path to the Constitution while leaving the legislature's door wide open. That's not reform. That's a consolidation of power.

A respectful challenge to Christians supporting the new Amendment 3:We are not asking whether you have prayed about it. ...
05/27/2026

A respectful challenge to Christians supporting the new Amendment 3:

We are not asking whether you have prayed about it. We hope you have.

We are asking whether you can defend your vote from the written Word of God.

Not from polling.
Not from political strategy.
Not from “this is the best we can do.”
Not from “God laid it on my heart.”

**Chapter and verse.**

Let’s be clear: if the new Amendment 3 simply repealed Missouri’s terrible 2024 abortion amendment, we could support that. Repealing that evil would be a good and necessary thing.

But that is not where this amendment stops.

It goes on to write abortion exceptions into the Missouri Constitution — including r**e, in**st, fetal anomaly, and medical emergency. For r**e and in**st, it allows abortion up to 12 weeks.

That means the question before Christians is not merely:

“Is this better than what we have now?”

The question is:

**Does God permit civil law to protect some innocent children while leaving others legally available to be killed?**

Many supporters say, “This is the best we can do.”

But Christians should be very careful with that argument.

Scripture repeatedly warns us not to fear man more than God. The question is not whether the polling looks hard. The question is whether God has commanded us to do justice.

Over and over in Scripture, God places His people in fights too big for them so that they will know He is the Lord. He does not call His people to calculate obedience by visible odds. He calls them to obey.

If the child in the womb is an image-bearer of God, then we do not have authority to decide which innocent children receive legal protection and which ones become the price of political strategy.

Some supporters have appealed to Luke 15 — the shepherd who leaves the ninety-nine to rescue the one.

But that parable does not support sacrificing the one to protect the ninety-nine.

It teaches the opposite.

Jesus says the shepherd leaves the ninety-nine in the open country and goes after the one that is lost until he finds it. The Good Shepherd does not count the vulnerable one as an acceptable loss. He pursues the one. He rescues the one. He rejoices over the one.

If anything, Luke 15 condemns the logic behind Amendment 3.

Children conceived in r**e or in**st are being treated as the “acceptable loss” in order to politically protect others. Children diagnosed with a fetal anomaly are being treated as exceptions to justice. But they are not less human. They are not less innocent. They are not less made in the image of God.

And let’s be honest about the practical side too.

The claim is that this amendment is “better than nothing” and will save lives. But abortion pills are available by mail. Women can still travel to other states. And as written, the amendment itself does not require a police report, prosecution, conviction, or any clear verification standard before the r**e or in**st exception is used.

So we are being asked to compromise on innocent blood in exchange for a political promise that may not even deliver what supporters claim.

That is not a biblical standard.

God’s Word says, “You shall not murder.”

God’s Word says, “Rescue those who are being taken away to death.”

God’s Word says, “Open your mouth for the mute, for the rights of all who are destitute.”

God’s Word does not say, “Protect the unborn, except when the polling is difficult.”

So here is the question every Christian voter, pastor, lawmaker, and pro-life leader should be willing to answer:

**Where does Scripture authorize us to protect some innocent children while leaving others legally available to be killed?**

If we cannot defend that from Scripture, we should not defend it in law.

Repealing the 2024 abortion amendment would be good.

But replacing it with constitutional exceptions for the killing of innocent children is not justice.

Partial protection may be a political strategy.

Equal protection is Biblical justice.

The Good Shepherd did not sacrifice the one for the ninety-nine. He went after the one.

Missouri should do the same.

**Vote NO on the new Amendment 3. Demand total protection for every unborn child, from conception.**

https://youtu.be/_pvXKmhs5tA?si=Q35dphaC8s8PIw0W

🚨 This is the first episode in our new series on the New Amendment 3 (HJR 73).What you’ll hear may sound different than what politicians or even pro-life gr...

Is Missouri building a digital ghost town? 🏛️⚡Look at what’s happening in China right now. A recent MIT Technology Revie...
05/27/2026

Is Missouri building a digital ghost town? 🏛️⚡

Look at what’s happening in China right now. A recent MIT Technology Review investigation revealed that hundreds of AI data centers built during a massive, hype-driven rush are now sitting completely empty—with some estimates showing up to 80% of that new capacity going unused. Local governments chased the trend, threw subsidies at projects, and built massive infrastructure without actual, sustainable market demand.

Now look at Missouri.

Our state leaders and local political subdivisions are treating AI data centers like a modern gold rush. We just saw the announcement of a staggering $15 billion Google facility in Montgomery County, right next to an Amazon project already tangled up in citizen lawsuits over transparency and resource management.

But Missourians are pushing back hard. From the massive voter revolt in Festus—where residents just ousted half the city council at the ballot box over a controversial data center deal—to calls for permanent bans in St. Charles, communities are saying no to the intense strain these facilities place on our water, power grids, and tax structures.

Our politicians are calling this the "space race of our time." But if we don't slow down and listen to local communities, we risk sticking Missouri taxpayers with the fallout of a cooled tech bubble: massive, resource-draining concrete warehouses that stand empty.

We dive deep into this comparison, the hidden costs, and what it means for the future of our state's infrastructure in our latest article.

👉 Read "Code vs. Concrete" here: https://new-site.act4mo.org/posts/code-vs-concrete.html

Let’s take China's empty infrastructure as a warning. Hype leaves a ghost town; real community impact lasts forever.

Why the United States' centralized approach to hyperscale data centers threatens individual liberty, draining resources while the rest of the world embraces decentralized AI.

Address

PMB# 271 540 E. Young Avenue Ste A
Warrensburg, MO
64093

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Act for Missouri posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Share