04/20/2026
Last Tuesday, the City of Wausau approved $10 million in new debt to cover maintenance costs, motor pool expenses, and items such as trees and pavement markings. It raises a simple question: what is the future taxpayer to say about this debt?
Some could argue that Tax Increment District (TID) spending should be bonded, since it relies on future revenue from development. That can make sense—if the district generates growth beyond the initial investment and the resulting revenue is used to retire the debt rather than be redirected elsewhere. That concern is not theoretical. It was central to the recent referendum. TID closures were intended to help fund firefighters, yet those funds were ultimately diverted to general expenses.
In the latest borrowing, TID #12—the redevelopment of the former mall site—received just over $2 million of the roughly $4 million allocated across all TIDs. This same district also received $1.75 million from TID #7 in April of last year. TID #7 was expected to close in early 2026, returning an estimated $1.9 million to the city’s budget. Why couldn’t those funds—$1.9 million or even $1.75 million—cover the $1.4 million cost of the firefighters? The answer lies in how the borrowed funds were allocated, including items like trees and pavement markings.
Trees are important to the health and appearance of any city, and tree ordinances serve a purpose. But taking on additional debt to fund them is questionable at best. The Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources offers grants for urban forestry that can match what the city borrowed, and similar federal funding was made available through the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022. If outside funding is available, is new debt the best option?
The decision to bond $75,000 for pavement markings raises another concern. The city’s 2026 adopted budget states: “The City will not issue long-term debt with an amortization period longer than the life of the asset being financed.” Yet, according to the WisDOT maintenance manual, painted pavement markings last about one year in Wisconsin, while thermoplastic markings last up to five. This borrowing is structured over 10 years—double the longest expected lifespan. If the funds are intended for equipment, the budget does not make that clear.
Wausau’s median effective property tax rate is 2.05%, nearly twice the national average. The city has now reached more than 33% of its allowable debt capacity, and as debt rises, so does the cost to service it. In this budget cycle, debt service totals $14.86 million, with $5.61 million coming directly from property taxes.
Ultimately, all city revenue comes from taxpayers—whether labeled as fees, permits, or taxes. Government exists to serve the people, and taxpayers have upheld their responsibility, contributing at nearly twice the national rate. The city, however, is falling short in managing those resources responsibly.
As the new City Council is seated this week, it is a good time to remember why the city exists, to serve the citizens. As a new member of the council representing District 11, that service includes protecting the citizens of my district from unnecessary taxes. That task is complex but not complicated. The city is in a hole so it’s time to stop digging