10/19/2024
Once youâve seen my law enforcement endorsements for Attorney General below, ask yourself:
1-Jeff Jackson claims that his legal experience is superior because only he has âbeen a prosecutor.â Why then do law enforcement leaders overwhelmingly endorse ME, including the District Attorneys â THE PROSECUTORS â plus the sheriffs, and every major police organization? Could it be that people serving in law enforcement for 30-40 years know that Jeffâs 3 years as a baby prosecutor followed by 8 years of pure politics do not measure up to my 30-year litigation career in trial and appellate courts?
2-Jeff claims that Iâm an âextremistâ and âculture warrior.â In whose book? Is it likely that those many, highly experienced servants of the law would publicly endorse me if that were true? Could it be that Jeff is employing the woke lexicon equating traditional, apolitical, and strong law enforcement and policing with âextremism,â the same poisonous rhetoric that has put cops on the defensive and caused crime to surge? Might my endorsers know that that policy direction makes their jobs impossible and families less safe?
3-Will Jeff publish any law enforcement endorsements at all? Even his primary opponent, the Soros-style District Attorney for Durham, lampooned Jeffâs experience deficit, saying that we need an Attorney General who âactually knows what she is doing.â If any law enforcement endorsements are available to Jeff at all, would they serve only to reinforce how woke he is? Is that why he has announced none?
4-If Jeff is the bipartisan, moderate, straight talker he poses to be, when he âsets the record straightâ on his large social media accounts, why doesnât he attempt to explain my vast advantage in law enforcement endorsements? Could he be doing something other than straight talk?
Go vote!