Move Westland Forward

Move Westland Forward Everyone has an opinion - we're trying to help everyone have an informed opinion! The Admins for this page are Rich and Lisa Graham.

If you block an admin and/or they are unable to see your posts on this page you will be blocked from this page. Move Westland Forward was formed to insure a positive outcome of political elections held within the city of Westland, Michigan. We hope to provide forums that will educate and inform citizens - helping them to elect candidates that will be accountable, transparent and connected with res

idents. We welcome respectful comments and opinions. Move Westland Forward Political Action Committee is not endorsed by any candidate or candidate's committee. Move Westland Forward is run by Lisa & Richard Graham of Westland, Michigan.

From Monday's council meeting (we have not watched it yet).   City budget starting July 2026 passed 5-2.   Well done.Can...
06/03/2026

From Monday's council meeting (we have not watched it yet). City budget starting July 2026 passed 5-2. Well done.

Can you guess who voted NO??? Hint, the only two obstructionists left after you voted out the rest.

05/25/2026
Happy Mother’s Day.  Enjoy
05/10/2026

Happy Mother’s Day. Enjoy

Thoughts and prayers are with the Woehlke family on this day.  Dark day in Westland 13 years ago.In the comments, there ...
05/08/2026

Thoughts and prayers are with the Woehlke family on this day.

Dark day in Westland 13 years ago.

In the comments, there will be a little more about the awful day.

05/06/2026

Video of Deputy Mayor Godbout's comments during Monday's council meeting.

He provided a statement based on Councilwoman Sampey going after the Mayor and also the Deputy Mayor over the last few council meetings.

He cleared the air and exposed Sampey (and her sidekick Rutkowski) fibbing about the recent Goodfellow event at the fire station.

In the comments will be the proper links for forms and procedures to follow which Sampey and Rutkowski completely ignored and for some reason went directly to the fire department that has zero authority to authorize an event.

Pure Sampey

04/26/2026

From the council meeting on Monday.

Mayor Coleman set the record straight on Sampey’s antics.

Sampey continued to try and spin her narrative while the court decided she denied Edward’s freedom of speech. Pure Sampey

Rutkowski’s council comments was also full of whining and complaining. 15-20 minutes of just nonsense.

Time to vote them out in 2027.

Awful

Thank you Edward M Pruett III for taking the time preparing and posting this about Wegela.  He showed his true colors in...
04/19/2026

Thank you Edward M Pruett III for taking the time preparing and posting this about Wegela.

He showed his true colors in that August 2025 council meeting by supporting and trying to protect Sampey.

Wegela, Sampey, McDermott and Tlaib stand together and that is very bad for freedom of speech. You have seen how Sampey tried to eliminate it.

Shameful but that is Pure Sampey/Wegela (bad for Westland, bad for Michigan and bad for America).

Politicians have a habit of saying one thing and doing another. That’s not a controversial statement — it’s a pattern. And not every public official fits that mold, but career politicians and aspiring career politicians tend to follow it with precision.

When someone tells you they are “for the people,” that statement means nothing on its own. Words are easy. Optics are easy. Showing up to events, shaking hands, positioning yourself in the right rooms — that can all be manufactured. Politicians, such as the ones we are describing, look for opportunities to fabricate an image. But what cannot be manufactured over time, what can't be fabricated, is consistency. And if you watch closely enough, the truth always surfaces.

👉 Maya Angelou said it best: “When someone shows you who they are, believe them...the first time.”

---

When State Representative Dylan Wegela first appeared at a Westland City Council meeting to introduce himself to the community, he didn’t introduce himself by standing with the community. He introduced himself by speaking against one.

Richard Graham, of Move Westland Forward, stood up and challenged the old regime — something this community has needed for a long time, something he has been doing for a long time successfully. And the community has greatly benefited from his relentless advocacy.

Wegela followed behind him with urgency to speak. Instead of choosing to stand with the community, Wegela chose to push back against Richard Graham's challenge.

Not against bad power — not against the harm to the community that Richard Graham was conveying — but against that very community member, and in turn, against the change needed so Westland could prosper.

That moment mattered, and I addressed it in real time from the podium because it didn’t sit right, and it stayed with me long after the meeting ended.

🤦🏾‍♂️ When the meeting ended, Dylan Wegela sought me out to smooth over what he perceived to be a potential relationship-building issue, and stated, "I wasn't addressing you. I was addressing that other speaker (Richard Graham). I didn't like what he was saying. He didn't have to say it like that."

He, literally, admitted to coming up against a community member. And, for some odd reason, he figured that would play well with me. It didn't. And I noted it.

Dylan Wegela was not a person to be trusted -- an elected official, in official capacity, thinking a community advocate would appreciate that his explanation was that his statement wasn't against me. (Seriously? I'm a community advocate, not an Edward advocate.) 🤦🏾‍♂️

I, immediately, knew the game he was playing.

👉 And from that point forward, I made it my duty to pay close attention. Where things were right, I illuminated. Where things were off, I documented. And, as expected, more was off than was on.

---

Over time, you could see the shift with Wegela — and not in a good way. The words became more refined, and more aligned with what people wanted to hear, but something underneath never lined up. The tone changed, but the direction didn’t. And his attacks seemed to be against the very institution that could actually get movement — the party he claimed to be part of.

What he framed as boldness often worked against the very progress people were pushing for. It was idealistic but it wasn't real. And when you diligently watched — not just the statements, but the positioning — it became clear that the conflict he leaned into wasn’t with real solutions from those who could get the results, but with words that sounded like solutions but had no real way forward to be accomplished. (He spoke with the hot air that dissipates until the next press release or next media camera shone upon him.)

And while all of that was happening, when this community actually needed voices — needed presence — needed someone willing to stand in the gap — he wasn’t there.

The same podium he used to come after a community member — Richard Graham — Wegela never came back to it with anything substantive related to the plight many everyday Westland residents faced. He showed his position "the first time."

And those fighting day-to-day did not have Wegela standing beside them. This wouldn't be noticed unless it was being watched, because the pomp and circumstance in other areas made the image he created appear as reality, but it wasn't and I was watching.

---

Then August 18, 2025 happened.

On that date, Dylan Wegela showed up to a Westland City Council meeting and chose to speak on a situation involving me. I definitely wouldn't have expected it. My continuing assessment of him wasn't made known. But he made his stance known when he took that podium on August 18, 2025 concerning a Melissa Sampey narrative creation. — a situation I didn’t even know existed at the time, and one I was not present for.

>

Again, I wasn't there. I didn't know about it. And, in that instance, I was called out by name by Melissa Sampey in an official government meeting, in her official capacity.

---

What makes that moment stand out isn’t just what was said — it’s the timing.

That meeting began roughly 30 minutes after Melissa Sampey filed a police report that would later be deemed baseless. A report that the Wayne County APA made clear resulted in “no crime committed by Pruett.” A report tied to a chain of events that exposed far more than it concealed — including consequences that reached her own household — Brian Sampey, her husband, being cited for driving on a revoked driver's license, pleading guilty as part of a plea deal. And yet, in that exact window, in an official capacity, in an official meeting, Dylan Wegela was there — speaking on it.

That’s not something you ignore. That’s something you question.

And the pattern didn’t stop there.

---

After the report collapsed. After the facts came out. After the PPO — built on that same foundation — was dismissed in five minutes on March 31, 2026… the question becomes what people did after they knew the truth, at each point the truth was revealed.

Because that’s where further character defining actually shows up.

🤔 It would be very interesting to know whether Dylan Wegela chose to support Melissa Sampey behind the scenes during that process. Because if he did, that doesn’t just raise questions — it answers them. (**Hint, Hint** — We already know, and questions should be raised. Answers are already there.)

---

Now fast forward, and you see him standing at a press conference speaking on behalf of issues impacting Krystal Clark, dealing with conditions no one should have to endure in the WHV Women's Prison in Michigan. Fighting for Krystal should matter beyond any type of political ploy. Her life is in jeopardy, and the situation is dire.

>
..and I have concerns about Dylan Wegela's involvement. Not because he shouldn't speak up and stand up, but because of what his motivation and motives may be. Pattern creates this concern.

When you’ve watched the pattern, you don’t just listen to the words — you evaluate the consistency. And Wegela's consistency has been to make noise, be in front of the cameras, and fail the people where it really matters.

---

So, Dylan — real advocacy isn’t situational. It isn’t selective. And it isn’t something you turn on when it’s visible.

And Dylan — it’s simple: don’t play with Krystal's situation. If you’re going to step into that space, do something real. Otherwise, step out of the way.

We recognize the irony being demonstrated:

▪️Dylan Wegela — expresses support for old regime officials who have harmed the community
▪️Dylan Wegela — finds as many ways as possible to be in front of the camera
▪️Dylan Wegela — participates in a cause led by a witness who supplied a letter to the court against an old regime person whom Wegela supported in official capacity

Dylan — Don't play with Krystal. Don't play with the people. Get to work for real.

---

To the community — this is where your role matters.

When it’s time to vote, don’t listen to what someone says in a moment. Look at what they’ve done over time. Look at where they stood when it wasn’t convenient (not what they made to look inconvenient). Look at who they stood against, and ask yourself why.

Because if the actions don’t match the words, the answer is already there.

And when that happens — party doesn’t matter. Only patterns do.

Vote accordingly.

***Link to the full collection log in the comments.***

👉 Edward M Pruett III 👈
🗣️ "A Voice of Change!" 🤝

🏷️ Trische' Duckworth | Jay Love

Well said and thank you for posting this Emily Bauman Westland City Councilwoman.    We cannot have our elected official...
04/13/2026

Well said and thank you for posting this Emily Bauman Westland City Councilwoman.

We cannot have our elected officials systematically silence citizens. Abuse of power and to weaponize the police department along with the court system to silence someone causes significant harm to their freedom of speech.

Below is a quote from her post and she is spot on.

Yes, I have said it before--whether I like or dislike what you say, whether I agree or disagree, whether it is offensive or not, I will fight for your right to say it.

News that matters sometimes does not get attention--last December the European Union slapped a fine of $120 million euros ($140 mil USD) on X, formerly known as Twitter and owned by Elon Musk. Musk has filed a lawsuit and is fighting this fine.

Why the fine, you ask? Well, it appears that X with it's efforts to keep speech free broke a rule of the DSA--the Digital Services Agreement, otherwise known in the free speech supporter world, as Delete, Silence, Abolish. Turns out X is not filtering or suppressing the comments and posts of its users.

Huh, imagine that. A United States digital platform that honors the 1st Amendment and the purpose of free speech as it is intended throughout the world in countries that profess to have it.

When we speak of freedom and when we VALUE the freedom we have in our beautiful United States, the 1st Amendment is the heart and crux of it all--thus why it is the FIRST! Free speech is not free if it can be silenced by a government. And yes, the EU operates as a collective form of government.

Regardless whether you are posting on X or Facebook or Instagram or writing an op ed, or any other platform, social, printed or otherwise, your freedom to express yourself IS STRTICTLY PROTECTED and MUST be defended, preserved and fought for. Sometimes it is sad how hard we must fight to preserve this right, but fight we must---whether that is militarily or simply (& expensively) in a court of law.

Can you monitor your own social media and delete posts, remove 'friends'? YES. Can you, in your place of business or on your social media page, ask people to leave if they break a rule you have about the language or decorum they display or you just don't like it? YES. Can you, in your home, on your property, ask people to refrain from discussing money, religion or politics? YES. Can I, as an elected official, monitor and remove posts I do not want on my personal social media, including pages representing myself as an elected official (as long as it is not a page representing the city--only myself)? YES. However, NO ONE serving or operating in a governmental capacity, nor any one in the private sector, has the right to silence or otherwise remove ANOTHER persons rights to free speech on THEIR own pages, platforms or any media they choose to express themselves.

We all know of the exceptions--F*RE!, B*MB!, and similar will be seriously addressed. Explicit, direct inciting of actual violence is not allowed, but has legal standards on proving. Threats are definitely a red flag--and need to be watched, but in of themselves are still an expression of speech--Yes, this is an area or necessary discernment and watching. We know protests, even if we do not agree are forms of free speech. Even lying is 'free speech', though there are serious consequences! AND, individually, SELF-GOVERNMENT is KEY. Just because we CAN, does not mean we DO!

I will fight and defend our 1st Amendment, ultimately a God-given right to FREE SPEECH. I will honor the oath I took to uphold our US Constitution, Michigan State Constitution, City of Westland Charter, and Rules and Policies of the Westland City Council--all of which support and recognize the Right to Free Speech to all citizens.

Yes, I have said it before--whether I like or dislike what you say, whether I agree or disagree, whether it is offensive or not, I will fight for your right to say it.

https://apnews.com/article/x-elon-musk-twitter-european-union-regulations-0a135601e050518d5aa0a0155f973177

04/09/2026

Video is from Monday's council meeting.

Councilwoman Sampey decided to throw the administration under the bus regarding her Easter event.

Mayor Coleman took exception to this and did not allow Sampey to spin her narrative along with extremely stretching the truth. Pure Sampey (always all about her).

We applaud Mayor Coleman for holding his ground and NOT allowing the Councilwoman to spin it and then try to spin it some more (she learned/was trained well from Wild, Londeau, Hart, etc).

Councilwoman Sampley repeatedly during her comments implied the administration, some on the council, basically do not like her and do not want to work with her (whine, whine, and more whining).

We know that the City Council and the Administration are working well together and it appears there is really only one issue (Sampey and her gang). Pure Sampey and vote her out in Nov 2027.

Watched the council meeting last night (more specifically, Councilwoman Sampey’s closing comments).We will supply facts ...
04/08/2026

Watched the council meeting last night (more specifically, Councilwoman Sampey’s closing comments).

We will supply facts and not fiction or feed into some type of imaginary narrative that Sampey likes to spew.

Councilwoman Melissa Sampey filed a PPO against Edward M Pruett III.

Sampey stated last night that the Westland Police Department guided her to do this (she stated with the Guidance of Law Enforcement). I wonder if the Police Chief would agree that his department should give guidance (direction to a citizen)?

There was a court case last week to throw out the PPO. Mr. Pruett had at least four witnesses along with his preparation. The judge did not have any of Mr. Pruett’s witnesses called to testify and Mr. Pruett only spoke about 12 words. The judge threw out Sampey’s claims and stopped the PPO. The judge in review of Sampey’s information, considered it stopping/denying freedom of speech (so Sampey did it to deny Mr. Pruett’s freedom of speech). Mr. Pruett during that time, could not attend council meetings, could not do any type of factual posts involving Sampey (he was silenced). She silenced and took away his rights (bottom line). She abused her elected position and position of power in my (Rich) opinion.

Attached to this post is Peter Herzberg’s witness statement (thank you Mr. Herzberg) to shed light on the damage that the Councilwoman creates

One of Sampey’s claims was that Mr Pruett shared information on Facebook too many times (really, that was a reason Councilwoman?).

Last night Sampey continued to whine and complain about Mr. Pruett posting a video online showing her car (her family’s license plate). Today I “googled” my license plate and nothing came up where I lived, etc (unless I wanted to spend money to learn more). Today I “googled” the license plate in the video, and the same thing. License plates are shared on social media videos all the time. You can find out if you want (public information) on where she lives based on the Wayne County political filings and also her house tax information (any of us has that info there which is public information). What she did not say was that her husband was driving the car on a revoked license, and the Westland Police were involved with this after it was exposed. A minor detail about her husband was not brought up by her.

One additional tidbit on the above. On her government Councilwoman page, she posted a picture showing multiple license plates. Did she ask permission to share their license plates? Why did she not blur them out? That post was shared over and over and over again. I guess fine for Sampey while not knowing if it would harm any of our children.

She states about her being put into a box four years ago. To very clear, she was part of Team Londeau and the Wild lackies. Londeau was even at her house during a debate. She was brought in because she did what she was told by Reddy, Wild, Londeau, etc.

She talks about a small group, certain individuals. What she is saying here is you do not matter if you do not align with her. Your demands for change as seen at the ballot box is really just a small, minor inconvenience. She does not want to represent you but protect the same ole same ole.

During her comments she said people on council, administration, etc were against her. I would say of course; you were part of Team Wild, Londeau, Hornbuckle. Now you and Rutkowski are the last ones left. Your group has harmed many over the years (including my family). Your group is being voted out of office by the people (Hornbuckle and Hart has election).

She did not say anything about her family during the March 2024 council meeting. Her husband sat right behind me to harass and bully. He walked right behind me as I went up to speak but then turned to go out into the hallway. He then flipped off the council and citizens as he left which was threatening to say the least. He was deemed such a threat that the next council meeting extra police were brought in. She never spoke up against this but smiled and I guess thought it was completely fine to harass, bully, intimidate citizens. You never denounced the violence being caused from your family.

Based on what sure appears to be an abuse of power as an elected official, she needs to resign.

Listening to her is frankly work watching because it really should shine a light on her fictional reality along with how she is at the center of it.

Address

Westland, MI
48185

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Move Westland Forward posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The Organization

Send a message to Move Westland Forward:

Share