01/09/2021
Can Photographs Lie?
By Wendi Tremblay
As a child, my mother always told me “photographs don’t lie.” Considering that was back in the 1960’s and 70’s, she was probably right. Enter the age of electronics, with the ability to alter and put messages with photos, and suddenly, my mother’s words are not so true any more.
Yet, throughout the last 3 decades, I still didn’t realize the extent that photos are misused and mislabeled, until it involved one of my own.
In early 2018, my son and I became stuck in Tampa, FL, when a March snowstorm forced our flight home to cancel. We decided to go to Derby Lane in nearby St. Petersburg and watch some greyhound racing. I put a quick post on a Facebook group I knew had trainers on it, asking if anyone had time to give us a kennel tour. I got an answer, and our kennel visit was set up.
As the dogs were released for “evening turnout,” Charlie, (racing name Charlie Hines), came over, looking for a cookie we had when he met us on his way out. Whose dog has not perfected that forlorn look when they beg for our food? I took a quick photo of Charlie through the fence as he stared us down, wearing his red muzzle. Upon arrival home, I went through my photos and put some in the Facebook group where I had posted, looking for a kennel visit. One photo was that of Charlie.
My post with photos of our visit got a lot of comments and Charlie’s photo of his “acting ability” was no exception. Four months later, I saw an article in an animal rights group’s publication on some of the people pushing an amendment to end wagering on greyhound racing in Florida. One of the photos with that article looked familiar. You see, Charlie had a distinct marking on his head like a 3 leafed clover. This dog did too. I scrolled through my phone, and sure enough, it was MY photo! It had been darkened around the edges making the well-lit area look gloomy, and they had cropped it so the other dogs running around the pen were not visible. With it was a message to end greyhound racing and rescue him! The picture resurfaced again on Grey2k’s page and several other sites where they were pushing to end Florida greyhound racing. Again, my photo was darkened with sad messages that did not apply to this dog at all! Unfortunately, Charlie had become the poster-dog for that campaign to end wagering on greyhounds.
Furious, I asked that they remove it, but I heard nothing. I was blocked from “Grey2k’s” page, so I couldn’t comment there, (which I feel is a freedom of speech issue). I attained a lawyer to write a cease and desist letter, which he did, also asking them to remove the photo from all their material put out to the public. This was in September before the election. Had they been ethical, I feel this would have been done! But by Election Day November 6th, my photo was still in wide circulation, and we had heard nothing.
Finally in December, long after the election, a letter came from a lawyer in Florida. Imagine, a Massachusetts lobby group hiring a Florida Attorney! The attorney’s letter stated that since the photo was posted in a public group, Grey2k was “entitled to it” because they “thought” it represented “cruelty” that needed to be told. No statement to the fact that (as I explained above), this dog was begging for a cookie, and was a happy greyhound. I never mind if my photos are shared, as long as they remain in the context they are taken. This was not. In fact, Charlie had not raced well, and long before they used this photo as misinformation in their campaign, he had been taken to the adoption center at the track and had found his forever retirement home. After all, retired US greyhounds now have 100% adoption if they do not stay at home with their racing owner.
The Florida lawyer ended his letter by stating that I would not become a problem, or I would have to pay Grey2k’s legal costs. Pay THEIR costs? It was MY PHOTO they altered! The average race enthusiast does not have the huge coffers to afford court costs, defending against these wealthy activist groups. I feel groups like this use photos that greyhound owners take at kennels, tracks, or farms, and re-portray them in a sad tone, seeking votes and more donations to their already wealthy bank accounts. And where does their money come from? Donors who think they are actually helping animals! My adoption group never saw a penny from them after they shut down greyhound racing in Massachusetts the end of 2009.
So sadly, my mother’s advice no longer holds true. When you see photos put out by these groups ask yourself (1) Was the photo taken where they say it was? And in what time period? (2) Does this photo portray what the initial photographer intended? And finally (3) Does the caption really state what the dog was actually doing? After my experience, my guess is “none of the above.”