Mthwakazi Republic Party - MRP Network -Information

Mthwakazi Republic Party - MRP Network -Information Contact information, map and directions, contact form, opening hours, services, ratings, photos, videos and announcements from Mthwakazi Republic Party - MRP Network -Information, Political Party, Bulawayo.
(1)

Mthwakazi Republic Party(MRP) is a revolutionary organisation fighting for MATABELELAND (MTHWAKAZI)'s Independence away from Zimbabwe.founded on 11 January 2014 in Bulawayo

29/05/2026

Friday, 29 May 2026

“An Examination of Alleged State Capture in Zimbabwe: Leaked Audio Recordings, Oligarchic Influence, and Political-Business Networks”

By Mqondisi Moyo, MRP President

A leaked audio recording involving two identified Zimbabwean figures
allegedly contain discussions suggesting that Kudakwashe Tagwirei has been aggressively pushing for the success and consolidation of the CAB3 project as part of a broader political strategy linked to Zimbabwe’s succession dynamics within ZANU-PF. According to interpretations emerging from the audios, the project is allegedly viewed not merely as an economic or developmental initiative, but as a strategic political instrument designed to strengthen networks aligned to President Emmerson Mnangagwa while simultaneously frustrating the succession ambitions of Vice President Constantino Chiwenga. The recordings allegedly imply that by consolidating economic influence, patronage structures, and elite loyalty through CAB3-linked interests, Tagwirei seeks to position himself as a decisive power broker capable of shaping the post-Mnangagwa political order and ultimately creating conditions favourable to his own long-term influence and possible pathway toward future national leadership.

The leaked audio recording has detonated one of the most politically explosive controversies in recent Zimbabwean history, allegedly exposing businessman Kudakwashe Tagwirei as not merely a wealthy entrepreneur, but as a central pillar within an expanding political-business empire deeply intertwined with the machinery of the Zimbabwean state. The recordings also allegedly revealed the extraordinarily tight passive and active security arrangements surrounding Tagwirei’s residence, including claims of heavily controlled access and layered protection systems. Additionally, discussions within the audios referenced the existence of a special private vault allegedly installed inside his home, said to contain significant stores of personal liquid wealth, including gold bullion, hard currencies, and other valuable assets.

Although many of the claims contained in the recordings remain unverified and have not been authenticated through judicial or forensic processes, the audios have nevertheless intensified already widespread public perceptions that Zimbabwe is increasingly being governed not through transparent constitutional institutions, but through opaque networks of political patronage, elite accumulation, and strategic state capture.

The controversy surrounding Tagwirei no longer centres solely on wealth. It now touches on far more profound national questions involving power, sovereignty, institutional independence, and the future ownership of Zimbabwe’s strategic resources. The recordings allegedly portray a system in which political influence, economic control, religious mobilisation, and access to state institutions have become concentrated within a small elite class operating beyond meaningful public accountability.

At the centre of the allegations is the claim that Tagwirei’s influence stretches across fuel, mining, agriculture, banking, land policy, and sections of the ruling ZANU-PF establishment. Publicly documented business interests associated with him already span some of Zimbabwe’s most strategically sensitive sectors. His company, Sakunda Holdings, emerged over the years as one of the country’s dominant fuel and commodity networks, reportedly benefiting from preferential fuel arrangements, Treasury Bill financing mechanisms, and privileged access to state procurement systems.

The leaked audios now appear to reinforce long-standing fears that the enormous wealth generated through these arrangements may have evolved into direct political leverage capable of influencing institutions, succession battles, and national policy direction itself.

Among the most startling allegations are claims that Tagwirei allegedly controls liquid petroleum reserves exceeding 300 megalitres through structures linked to his fuel empire. If such claims were ever substantiated, they would place extraordinary economic leverage in private hands within a fragile economy where fuel effectively determines the survival of transport systems, agriculture, mining production, and industrial activity. In practical terms, whoever dominates fuel supply in Zimbabwe wields influence over the arteries of national economic life.

Equally controversial are allegations concerning massive land ambitions reportedly tied to long-term educational and developmental projects. According to discussions emerging from the recordings, Tagwirei allegedly intends to acquire more than 9 million hectares of land across Zimbabwe under programmes involving rural schools, educational infrastructure, and student hostel developments for tertiary learners in urban centres. While supporters may attempt to frame such ambitions as visionary philanthropy, critics argue that the concentration of such vast tracts of land under politically connected private influence raises deeply troubling questions about parallel governance, monopolisation of social infrastructure, and the erosion of state responsibility in public service delivery.

The audios also reinforce broader concerns surrounding Zimbabwe’s growing oligarchic political economy — a system in which wealth accumulation appears inseparable from political proximity. Investigative reports, sanctions findings, and public discussions over the years have repeatedly linked entities associated with Tagwirei to strategic mining operations involving gold, platinum, nickel, chrome, and ferrochrome assets, including associations with Landela Mining Ventures, Kuvimba Mining House, and other politically connected structures.

Critics argue that Zimbabwe’s mineral wealth, rather than functioning as a national developmental asset benefiting ordinary citizens, increasingly appears concentrated within tightly connected elite networks benefiting from privileged access to state-backed financing systems and acquisition opportunities. The deeper concern emerging from the leaked audios is therefore not merely corruption in the conventional sense, but the possible consolidation of long-term systemic control over Zimbabwe’s strategic national assets by politically protected economic actors.

Public reporting has also linked Tagwirei to substantial influence within Zimbabwe’s financial sector, particularly through alleged banking interests connected to institutions such as CBZ Holdings. Control or influence within banking structures carries enormous strategic significance because it potentially shapes access to credit, foreign currency allocation, investment flows, and corporate financing across the broader economy. The recordings appear to suggest that economic dominance is increasingly being transformed into political dominance through control of liquidity, finance, and strategic economic gateways.

Another controversial aspect emerging from the leaked discussions involves alleged boasting surrounding the attendance of senior ruling party officials, cabinet ministers, security-linked figures, and prominent Zimbabwean business elites at Tagwirei’s family events, particularly his son’s wedding ceremony. According to the insinuations contained in the recordings and related political discussions, the gathering of such influential political and economic figures was allegedly presented as proof of Tagwirei’s extraordinary influence within Zimbabwe’s power structure.

Critics argue that the symbolism of powerful political leaders, senior government officials, and wealthy business figures converging around a private businessman reinforces perceptions that political authority in Zimbabwe may increasingly revolve around elite patronage networks rather than constitutional institutions. The alleged boasting reportedly portrays the event not merely as a family celebration, but as a demonstration of political loyalty, influence, and proximity to state power. Discussions surrounding the ceremony allegedly went even further, suggesting that virtually everyone who mattered within ZANU-PF and the upper structures of government — including the entire cabinet, Politburo members, and President Emmerson Mnangagwa himself — would be present at the wedding. Within the context of the leaked claims, this was allegedly framed as undeniable proof that Tagwirei had become the ruling establishment’s ultimate power broker and absolute kingmaker.

The audios allegedly suggest that Tagwirei interpreted the attendance of high-ranking political and economic figures as evidence that he had already emerged as Zimbabwe’s “kingmaker” and potentially the de facto incoming political authority within sections of the ruling establishment. Whether exaggerated or not, such insinuations have intensified public debate over succession politics inside ZANU-PF and fears that future leadership outcomes may increasingly be shaped by elite financial influence rather than transparent democratic processes.

Perhaps even more disturbing are implications that political influence may extend beyond economics into social and institutional engineering. The recordings allegedly discuss influence within churches and religious movements, portraying religious institutions not merely as spiritual communities but as political mobilisation structures capable of delivering legitimacy, loyalty, and electoral influence. Such allegations reinforce fears that religion, politics, and wealth are becoming dangerously intertwined within Zimbabwe’s power architecture.

The controversy also exposes the widening psychological and material divide between ordinary Zimbabweans and politically connected elites. While millions continue to face unemployment, collapsing public services, currency instability, and deepening poverty, allegations continue surfacing involving offshore financial structures, foreign-linked shell entities, strategic land ambitions, and immense concentrations of wealth among individuals operating close to state power.

Recent developments within government circles and broader national affairs have further fuelled public speculation that some of the issues allegedly discussed in the leaked recordings may already be manifesting within the state itself. Critics have pointed to the removal of former CIO Director-General Isaac Moyo, the dismissal of the Mines and Mining Development Minister, and other shifts involving senior officials as developments allegedly consistent with claims that influential business elites may be shaping political outcomes behind the scenes. MRP president Mqondisi Moyo has previously argued that Zimbabwe and its government structures have effectively become captured entities controlled by unelected elite individuals. Against this backdrop, Mthwakazi activists maintain that they will not retreat from demands for Mthwakazi independence, sovereignty, and self-determination, arguing that such aspirations are necessary to protect their natural resources, identity, and heritage from what they describe as corrupt and exploitative tribal ZANU-PF interests.

The audios repeatedly project the image of Tagwirei as a “kingmaker” — a figure allegedly capable of influencing succession dynamics and political outcomes far beyond any formal constitutional office. Discussions in the recordings allegedly portray him as operating on a scale incomparable to businessmen such as Scot Sakupwanya and Wicknell Chivayo, while figures such as Billy Rautenbach are presented among the few individuals perceived to possess similarly expansive regional economic influence.

Yet despite the explosive nature of these allegations, an important legal distinction remains essential. The leaked recordings do not constitute audited financial evidence, judicial findings, or conclusive proof of wrongdoing. Some claims may involve exaggeration, factional political warfare, misinformation, or manipulated material. However, the reason the controversy has resonated so intensely across Zimbabwean society is because it reflects already entrenched public perceptions regarding corruption, patronage capitalism, elite enrichment, and the capture of national institutions by politically connected networks operating above accountability.

Ultimately, the leaked audios have evolved into far more than a scandal surrounding one businessman. They have become a symbolic indictment of a political system many citizens increasingly perceive as captured by an untouchable oligarchic cartel — a system where state institutions appear subordinated to elite interests, national resources are concentrated in the hands of a few politically protected actors, and democratic governance risks being replaced by the silent consolidation of economic power into political sovereignty.

In Pursuit of Truth, Justice and Peace During Our Lifetime

Sisonke Sibambene SinguMthwakazi Sesikulungisa

Prepared and Presented by Mr Mqondisi Moyo
President of the Mthwakazi Republic Party (MRP)

*The Mthwakazi Republic Party (MRP)*               *Press release dated Thursday, 28 May 2026* From Bulawayo, Matabelela...
29/05/2026

*The Mthwakazi Republic Party (MRP)*

*Press release dated Thursday, 28 May 2026*

From Bulawayo, Matabeleland, emphasizing that strategic value does not cancel consent. The party responds to recent international developments involving Greenland, Arctic security, critical minerals, United States-Denmark-Greenland relations, and the renewed public debate about the political meaning of territory, sovereignty, and consent. Greenland's leadership has stated that Greenlanders are not for sale and that Greenlandic self-determination cannot be negotiated, a principle deemed correct and universal.

This principle has been visibly supported by protests in Nuuk, where Greenlanders rallied against the expanded United States diplomatic presence, asserting that Greenland belongs to Greenlanders. This is not merely an Arctic issue but a global rule of legitimacy: a people cannot be reduced to geography, minerals, military location, or the convenience of a larger state. Mthwakazi raises the same question in southern Africa—why is consent treated as sacred when powerful states discuss Greenland but seen as dangerous when the people of Mthwakazi peacefully demand their right to determine their own future?

Greenland demonstrates that self-determination is not isolationist; Greenland can negotiate cooperation, trade, security arrangements, and investment, including military and Arctic surveillance discussions, while maintaining that sovereignty remains non-negotiable. Similarly, Mthwakazi seeks a lawful and peaceful political future—dialogue is not surrender, cooperation is not ownership, and consent is not a favor granted by the state. The debate around Greenland is intensified by resource politics, as Greenland's rare-earth deposits have attracted significant commercial interest, including a recent 15-year offtake agreement linked to the Tanbreez project.

The lesson is not that valuable territories can be disposed of by outsiders but that the more valuable a land becomes, the more essential the consent of its people is. Strategic value, mineral wealth, existing borders, and the convenience of central governments do not cancel the rights of a people. The MRP has pursued peaceful and lawful avenues, including submitting a petition to the Southern African Development Community for Mthwakazi self-determination, signed by 25,880 people, which was registered in September 2023 under reference number 3951863. The people of Mthwakazi have actively asked to be heard.

MRP President Mqondisi Moyo stated that Greenland has declared that its people are not for sale and that self-determination cannot be negotiated, and he emphasizes that Mthwakazi makes the same claim—our land, history, resources, and people cannot be treated as assets of a state that refuses to listen. If Greenlandic consent matters in the Arctic, then Mthwakazi's consent matters in southern Africa. The MRP calls on Zimbabwe, SADC, the African Union, the United Nations, and democratic governments worldwide to uphold one standard: self-determination should not be exclusive to Europe, the Arctic, or favored peoples but should be a universal principle. Sisonke Sibambene SinguMthwakazi Sesikulungisa.

Enough is enough.

Mqondisi Moyo, President of the Mthwakazi Republic Party,

Tuesday, 26 May 2026“THE GREAT ZIMBABWEAN HEIST”HOW A RULING ELITE TURNED A NATION INTO A PRIVATE EMPIRE OF POWER, FEAR,...
26/05/2026

Tuesday, 26 May 2026

“THE GREAT ZIMBABWEAN HEIST”

HOW A RULING ELITE TURNED A NATION INTO A PRIVATE EMPIRE OF POWER, FEAR, EXCESS AND POLITICAL PLUNDER

The MRP President

The tragedy confronting Zimbabwe today is no longer merely economic collapse or political dysfunction. It is the emergence of what increasingly appears to be a deeply divided nation operating under twin and parallel systems of power, justice, opportunity and survival. On paper, Zimbabwe remains a constitutional republic governed by laws, institutions and democratic procedures. In reality, however, millions of citizens now believe the country functions through two separate states: one for ordinary people trapped in poverty and repression, and another for a politically connected oligarchy protected by wealth, influence and proximity to power.

For the poor, the unemployed, pensioners, civil servants, vendors and struggling working classes, Zimbabwe is increasingly experienced as a state governed through heavy taxation, economic exclusion, bureaucratic oppression, police and intelligence intimidation, politically connected militias and partisan youth structures allegedly used as ruling-party vanguards, as well as endless shortages, unemployment and social suffering. Ordinary citizens endure collapsing hospitals, decaying schools, power cuts, corruption, inflation and daily humiliation while being constantly expected to obey the law, remain silent and continue sacrificing for a nation whose wealth and opportunities increasingly appear concentrated within the hands of a politically protected elite.

But for the politically connected elite orbiting around ZANU–PF and the administration of Emmerson Mnangagwa, critics argue that a completely different Zimbabwe exists — a Zimbabwe of untouchable privilege, luxury convoys, state tenders, mining concessions, monopoly contracts, protection networks and staggering displays of unexplained wealth and influence. In this parallel state, political proximity allegedly opens doors to fortunes unimaginable to ordinary citizens, including access to vast tracts of prime land whose origins, ownership patterns and accumulation often raise serious public questions. To many frustrated Zimbabweans, the open gifting of enormous estates and high-value land parcels at elite weddings has become symbolic of a deeply unequal system in which politically connected individuals accumulate extensive properties and wealth while millions of ordinary citizens remain crowded in impoverished townships, informal settlements and communal areas with little or no meaningful access to land, housing or economic opportunity.

Nothing exposed this brutal contradiction more graphically than the extravagant wedding spectacle surrounding the family of businessman Kudakwashe Tagwirei. To many Zimbabweans, the event resembled less a wedding and more an open exhibition of raw oligarchic power, elite excess and financial impunity — the kind of opulence usually associated with Hollywood crime dynasties, Gulf monarchies or fictional mafia empires portrayed in Western films.

Millions of United States dollars were openly paraded through luxury vehicles, cash gifts, expensive machinery, elite land, tractors, cattle and designer items while the rest of the country sinks deeper into hunger, unemployment and despair. For many angry citizens, the wedding exposed what they believe to be the naked architecture of Zimbabwe’s patronage system: a closed political-business cartel where wealth circulates freely among connected elites while ordinary people are told the country has no money for salaries, medicines, pensions or infrastructure.

To critics, the public showering of staggering “gifts” on newlyweds and even innocent children did not merely symbolise wealth — it symbolised the normalisation of extreme corruption, influence peddling and elite protection culture. The spectacle triggered widespread public outrage because many Zimbabweans saw it as an indirect celebration of unchecked accumulation taking place in full view of a suffering population. What shocked citizens most was not simply the wealth itself, but the apparent absence of restraint, accountability or moral sensitivity in a nation facing deep social and economic collapse.

Across Zimbabwe, families cannot afford school fees. Cancer patients die without treatment. Graduates roam the streets unemployed. Pensioners survive on scraps. Hospitals lack basic medicine. Entire communities remain trapped in darkness, poverty and neglect. Yet simultaneously, a tiny politically connected aristocracy appears able to casually exchange fortunes at social gatherings with the confidence and protection of people operating above ordinary scrutiny.

This has intensified growing public perceptions that Zimbabwe is no longer functioning as a transparent republic but increasingly resembles a captured state where political authority and private accumulation have fused into a single system of elite self-preservation.

Critics argue that this is not accidental corruption but a deeply entrenched patronage order sustained through loyalty networks, selective empowerment and access to the presidency itself. In this interpretation, political power protects wealth accumulation while wealth in turn finances and reinforces political dominance. The result is what many citizens now describe as a “mafia-style” governance culture where influence matters more than institutions, loyalty outweighs merit and proximity to power determines economic opportunity.

The consequences for national cohesion are devastating. A society cannot survive indefinitely when one class experiences the law mainly as punishment and suffering while another experiences the state mainly as protection and privilege. Public trust collapses. Patriotism weakens. Institutions lose legitimacy. Citizens begin to feel excluded from their own country and economy.

Increasingly, frustrated Zimbabweans argue that the ruling establishment has evolved into a post-independence oligarchy mirroring aspects of the old colonial order it once claimed to oppose. Instead of dismantling systems of concentrated wealth and elite domination, critics say a new indigenous aristocracy has emerged — one built not on public service or national development, but on patronage, political access and economic capture.

The anger surrounding elite extravagance is therefore not rooted in jealousy of wealth. It is rooted in the perception that millions are suffering while a politically protected elite openly flaunts excess in front of the nation with near-total impunity. To many citizens, the Tagwirei wedding became more than a private celebration. It became a national symbol of a broken political order — a mirror reflecting the widening gulf between rulers and the ruled, privilege and poverty, power and accountability.

Zimbabwe today stands at a dangerous moral, political and historical crossroads. A nation divided between constitutional hardship for the poor and informal privilege for the powerful cannot indefinitely sustain peace, legitimacy or social stability. Eventually, the contradiction between these two Zimbabwe’s becomes too visible, too painful and too explosive to conceal. It is within this growing climate of frustration, exclusion and unresolved historical grievances that protest movements and regional resistance voices from Matabeleland and the Midlands have continued to intensify, particularly through organisations such as the Mthwakazi Republic Party, which positions itself as representing communities that view themselves as historically oppressed, politically marginalised, economically excluded and culturally suppressed under successive governments.

The party and its supporters maintain an uncompromising and unconditional political stance centred on the right to self-determination, restoration of the Mthwakazi state, sovereignty, territorial integrity and independent governance for the people of Mthwakazi. The movement further advocates for the restoration and protection of Mthwakazi’s natural resources, land rights, cultural heritage, languages, historical identity and traditional values, arguing that meaningful justice and lasting peace cannot be achieved without addressing decades of alleged marginalisation, unresolved historical trauma and unequal national development. Supporters of the movement increasingly argue that the future stability of the region depends not on continued political suppression, but on open dialogue, accountability, justice and recognition of the political aspirations and historical grievances of the people of Mthwakazi.

In Pursuit of Truth, Justice and Peace During Our Lifetime

Sisonke Sibambene SinguMthwakazi Sesikulungisa

Prepared and Presented by Mr Mqondisi Moyo
President of the Mthwakazi Republic Party (MRP)













Tuesday, 26 May 2026SELECTIVE JUSTICE, SELECTIVE HUMANITY: WHY DOES THE NDEBELE BLOOD OF GUKURAHUNDI STILL NOT MATTER?By...
26/05/2026

Tuesday, 26 May 2026

SELECTIVE JUSTICE, SELECTIVE HUMANITY: WHY DOES THE NDEBELE BLOOD OF GUKURAHUNDI STILL NOT MATTER?

By Mqondisi Moyo

Zimbabwe’s media and political establishment continue to expose one of the darkest and most painful contradictions in this country’s history: selective outrage, selective journalism and selective humanity.

The tragic story of Mildred Mapingure is undeniably painful and deserving of sympathy. No woman deserves r**e, humiliation, rejection or institutional neglect. Her suffering exposes the failures of a collapsing justice system and a government that has repeatedly abandoned vulnerable citizens.

However, the moral contradiction confronting Zimbabwe today cannot be ignored.

Why does the nation suddenly find its conscience when one individual tragedy emerges, yet remain largely silent about the systematic massacres, torture, disappearances, sexual violence and destruction inflicted upon tens of thousands of innocent civilians during the Gukurahundi atrocities?

Why do newspapers dedicate pages to isolated injustices while decades of organised state violence against the people of Matabeleland and surrounding regions continue to be diluted, suppressed or politically sanitised?

For over forty years, survivors of Gukurahundi have carried wounds that neither time nor silence can heal. Entire villages were devastated. Families were wiped out. Women were violated. Young men disappeared without trace. Innocent civilians were labelled enemies in their own homeland and subjected to military brutality under state authority.

Yet the same institutions now preaching justice and human rights spent decades criminalising open discussion of Gukurahundi itself.

The media was silenced.

Victims were intimidated.

Communities were forced into fear and silence.

Perpetrators were protected by political power, state immunity and diplomatic respectability.

To this day, no meaningful prosecutions have taken place. No genuine independent truth and justice process has been implemented. No serious reparations programme has been undertaken for affected communities.

Instead, Zimbabwe continues to reward and celebrate those associated with historical atrocities while survivors remain trapped in poverty, trauma and political exclusion.

This is not merely hypocrisy.

It is institutionalised selective humanity.

The issue is not about competing over suffering. Every victim matters regardless of tribe, language or political affiliation. The issue is consistency, fairness and moral honesty.

If r**e and state negligence deserve national outrage today, then the mass killings, torture, r**e and destruction committed during Gukurahundi deserved far greater outrage and accountability.

If justice matters for one Zimbabwean citizen, then justice must equally matter for the thousands of mothers who lost children, fathers thrown into shallow graves, displaced families, traumatised survivors and communities permanently scarred by state violence in Mthwakazi.

Within this context, the Mthwakazi Republic Party reaffirmed its longstanding political position advocating for the restoration of Mthwakazi statehood through self-determination, remedial justice and internationally recognised legal and political processes.

The party maintains that the people of Matabeleland and surrounding regions have endured decades of marginalisation, economic neglect, displacement, political exclusion and unresolved historical trauma under successive governments.

According to Mqondisi Moyo, lasting peace cannot be achieved through denial, propaganda or forced silence. Genuine reconciliation requires truth, accountability and structural political reforms capable of restoring dignity, security and equal rights to historically affected communities.

“The people of Mthwakazi cannot continue living as perpetual victims within a system that refuses to fully acknowledge their pain,” Moyo said.

“No nation can build genuine unity while ignoring mass suffering, unresolved atrocities and systematic marginalisation. Justice delayed is justice denied.”

The movement reiterated calls for remedial and judicial secession, restoration of Mthwakazi sovereignty, protection of territorial integrity, control over local resources and full recognition of the political, economic and cultural rights of the Mthwakazi people under international law and universally recognised human rights principles.

Moyo further demanded comprehensive reparations, compensation for victims, institutional accountability, memorialisation initiatives and independent international investigations into alleged historical injustices including Gukurahundi, political repression, forced displacement and economic exclusion.

He argued that sustainable peace in southern Africa can only emerge when governments confront historical crimes honestly instead of suppressing debate through fear, censorship and political intimidation.

“The people of Mthwakazi have the right to determine their own future, reclaim their dignity and pursue freedom, sovereignty and justice through lawful political and international mechanisms,” he stated.

He further warned that unresolved historical grievances continue to fuel instability, distrust, poverty and political alienation across affected communities.

“True peace is not built through silence over graves. Prosperity cannot emerge where injustice remains protected. Stability cannot exist where victims are denied truth and perpetrators are rewarded with power and honour.”

The party therefore called upon regional bodies, international human rights institutions, African governments, scholars, journalists and civil society organisations to support transparent truth-telling processes, historical documentation, legal accountability and peaceful democratic solutions capable of securing justice and long-term stability for both Mthwakazi and neighbouring states.

“The story of Gukurahundi must continue to be told repeatedly and fearlessly until justice is achieved,” Moyo concluded.

“History cannot be erased through intimidation. The blood of innocent civilians still cries out for justice, recognition and restoration.”

In Pursuit of Truth, Justice and Peace During Our Lifetime

Sisonke Sibambene SinguMthwakazi Sesikulungisa

Prepared and Presented by Mr Mqondisi Moyo
President of the Mthwakazi Republic Party (MRP)

Address

Bulawayo
0000

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Mthwakazi Republic Party - MRP Network -Information posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Share