19/05/2026
Some Councillors are arguing we can’t reduce rates by even 0.25% from the maximum allowed 2.75% because we would need to find around $250,000 in savings.
But here’s a question ratepayers should be asking:
Why are we running a grants program that costs the community roughly that same amount once administration is included? 🤔
The grants themselves total about $164,000, but council has admitted it costs 64 cents in administration for every $1 handed out. That pushes the real cost of the program to nearly $270,000.
So effectively, ratepayers are funding:
• $164,000 to community groups ⛹️♀️🧑🚒🎨🛟
• but more than $100,000 in bureaucracy and administration 🧾
If council ended the grants program altogether, the community would retain roughly $250,000 in their own pockets through lower rates.💰
And here’s the difference:
When residents get to keep their money and donate directly to their favourite sporting club, fundraiser, charity, school, CFA, SES, arts group, or community cause, far more of the money actually reaches the people doing the work — instead of disappearing into council processes, staffing, assessment panels, reports, and administration.
Council keeps claiming every fraction of a rate reduction is “unaffordable.” 🫰
But at the same time, it is overseeing programs where huge amounts of public money is being consumed before it ever reaches the community; and, here’s the kicker, some grants go to individuals for their own professional development with no broad community benefit.
Ratepayers are right to ask:
Is council supporting the community — or building expensive systems around distributing our own money back to us?
There is still time to have your say on councils draft budget at the attached link:
Geelong Advertiser
Geelong Indy
Surf Coast Times
Council Watch Victoria Inc
We welcome your feedback on the Draft Budget 2026-27