13/08/2026
*30 years* of *economically feasible* zoned capacity for housing.
Council planners are going to absolutely malfunction over this.
A massive state policy to disrupt greedy land banking councils. Yes those are the correct adjectives, we learn from Resident Action Group NIMBYs like NIRAG, CRAG and KRAG who label developers as “greedy land bankers” for having 1 lot in the pipeline, usually waiting lengthy conflicting studies.
Councils bank thousands of developable sites and trickle feed them to the market by restrictive zoning, we have seen a lot on the urban fringe moon to $500k from $200k only a decade ago. And yet you are told to worry about a ~$50k inflation on construction, or the states $6000 infrastructure contribution.
It’s worse for land banking existing resi land that should permit units. When council strategic planners do, it’s wishful thinking moreso than planning - they blame others for not reacting to LEP fairytales instantly. If it isn’t feasible it is a disingenuous attempt to supply more housing, like we are seeing for units in dapto. Instead places like Bulli, towradgi, some (accessible) water and park fronts can be rezoned for units - that’s where downsizers are willing to pay enough, freeing up homes for families. Council directly, outrightly refuse anything over 2 storeys in these locations, like the towradgi seniors living proposal.
This new state policy should kickstart change. What other choice will they have?