08/31/2026
Why did a change in uniform provoke such a strong reaction?
Over the past few weeks, our discussions about military unification and Royal designations have revealed something interesting.
The strongest reactions haven’t simply been about uniforms. They’ve been about identity.
Military organizations depend on cohesion: the trust, shared purpose and sense of belonging that allow people to function effectively under extraordinary circumstances. Uniforms, customs, battle honours and regimental traditions aren’t simply symbols. They help create the bonds that enable people to work together under pressure.
That also helps explain why the changes introduced during unification in 1968 to "CF Greens" generated such strong reactions. For many, it wasn’t simply a change in clothing or organizational structure. It affected something much deeper: the identity and cohesion of the units in which they served.
More than half a century later, those connections remain remarkably strong.
If cohesion is one of the foundations of military effectiveness… can there ever be too much of a good thing?
📷 Canadian War Museum: Captain Hans Arnsdorf wore this uniform in the Canadian Forces Maritime Command, which replaced the Royal Canadian Navy. Maritime Command shared this green "unification" uniform with the army and the air force, with only the jacket's lapel badges and the beret badge providing a naval identity. The four stripes on the sleeve denoting Arnsdorf's rank of captain have also lost the "executive curl", a small circular loop on the uppermost stripe.