09/08/2026
Here is a piece I wrote with Don Iveson and a number of prominent municipal leaders about the need to reject all of Danielle Smith's referendum questions.
You can find it on the Edmonton Journal website as well as here.
--
Opinion:
REJECT REFERENDUM QUESTIONS THAT DIVIDE ALBERTANS
By Rachel Notley, Cathy Heron, Don Iveson, Barry Morish*ta, Karina Pillay, Craig Snodgrass, Chris Spearman, Avnish Nanda
On Oct. 19, Albertans are being asked to vote on 10 troubling referendum questions. We believe the five discriminatory and hateful questions targeting new Albertans deserve more attention, and we are united in calling out the divisive politics and poor leadership behind them.
The question of Alberta’s independence has sucked up most of the oxygen, but the other questions deserve scrutiny for what they reveal about the politics of the day. Rejecting them all, particularly the mean-spirited immigration questions, offers a chance to stand up for a welcoming Alberta within a stronger united Canada.
Four questions seek to treat some immigrants differently, limiting or withholding their access — or, appallingly, their children’s access — to education, health care and other social supports. These questions are framed as fiscal measures, as if human beings are nothing but the cost of the services they use. As elected leaders, we all took oaths to serve and respect everyone who lives here, even our guests.
That used to go without saying. By contrast, the thrust of these four questions would effectively create a caste system in Alberta. We reject that inhospitable worldview — that’s not the Alberta we know.
Another question asks whether folks should have to show proof of citizenship at the time they vote (regardless of whether they are already on the voters list). However, there is not one shred of evidence that anyone is voting illegally. This question is there simply to imply that some immigrants are voting improperly — which has troubling echoes of the American far right’s campaign in the 1960s to keep Black voters from casting ballots, and is making it needlessly harder for all of us to exercise our democratic rights.
(On this point, along with the cumbersome multi-ballot process that will likely create long lines, we strongly recommend eligible voters request mail-in ballots for your own convenience, and to make space at the polls for others.)
Taken together, these five questions are designed to suggest that new immigrants are a problem. We cannot allow this “us-and-them” thinking to infect our province. We need newcomers in our industries, as entrepreneurs, in our public service work forces, and throughout our communities. We need their skills, their passion, and their spirit. To continue to attract newcomers, they will need to feel welcome and safe, not second-class.
The premier is careful not to name specific groups as undesirable, but the anti-immigrant sentiment within her political base reeks of the worst kind of hateful “blame-the-outsider” approach infecting American politics. We have an opportunity to soundly reject this mean-spirited agenda come this fall.
With so much emphasis on the separation issue, it’s worth recalling that Premier Danielle Smith announced the other referendum questions at budget time to shift blame for the then-$9.4-billion deficit. After demanding more immigrants in prior years, she then blamed immigrants for Alberta’s fiscal problems.
Did immigrants somehow raise the price of oil in the last few months, too? So let’s not forget, these questions were cynically framed to distract from the terrible UCP record on finances, education, health care, and affordability.
For instance, Alberta’s public education and public health care are stretched to the limit. Since 2019, the government has underfunded public education such that, as of 2025, Alberta ranked 10th among provinces for per-student funding, and 10th for number of students per teacher. Immigrants didn’t do that; Premier Smith’s government did.
In health care they broke their promise to build hospitals to keep up with population growth. In Edmonton, they cancelled the badly needed southwest hospital, leaving the city with the same hospital capacity since 1988, but now with double the population. They cut programs, funded below inflation and population growth, and wasted resources on reorganizations and privatization efforts. Immigrants didn’t do that; the UCP did.
What immigrants did do, (and will continue to do) is pay taxes. Just like all Albertans. Threatening to charge newcomers extra for deteriorating services won’t fix those same services we all depend on. We need leadership to improve life for all Albertans, not more scapegoating.
The remaining four questions on Smith’s ballot find other scapegoats upon whom to project blame. Ottawa, judges, the Senate and other Canadian institutions are lined up to keep our anger and attention directed away from the Alberta legislature. Like the questions on immigration, we also suggest these should be roundly rejected. Alberta should instead re-focus on asserting our strong and rightful place within confederation, as a constructive and dynamic partner rather than a grievance-wielding complainant.
We affirm that our province (and Canada) is built on a history of welcoming people, including newcomers, and of respecting and celebrating different languages, creeds and spirituality. Part of the magic of the Alberta we love is that we’ve delivered this promise of welcome and opportunity so successfully here. We have prospered because we worked together across our many differences. We shouldn’t throw that away.
Next to our welcoming Indigenous brothers and sisters, let’s remember that our families are all relatively recent newcomers here. Think of those Ukrainian settlers who arrived with nothing in the late 1800s and literally carved their first homes out of the sod east of Edmonton. They survived those first hard winters trading with Nehiyaw (Cree) neighbours. Ukrainians, again recently, and people from other troubled parts of the world, have all contributed immensely to making this one of the best places in the world to share with our fellow Albertans.
Here, we share, regardless of how long a family has been here.
In Alberta, we don’t win by excluding, by dividing or by turning inward. Those approaches are driven by fear. But that’s not who we are. We have long been an open place because we are optimistic, energetic, and we know how to work together to make good things happen.
In promoting these five questions, Danielle Smith wants us to reject our proudest traditions and values, including hospitality and welcome for everyone. We urge you to turn up and say No to the Nine and Yes to Canada. Reject the questions designed to divide us; defend Alberta values that bring us together as part of a stronger Canada.
--
Rachel Notley was Alberta’s premier from 2015-2019; Cathy Heron was mayor of St. Albert from 2017-2025 and president of Municipalities Alberta from 2021-2023; Don Iveson was Edmonton’s mayor from 2013-2021; Barry Morish*ta was leader of the Alberta Party from 2021-2023 and mayor of Brooks from 2016-2021; Dr. Karina Pillay was mayor of Slave Lake from 2004-2013 and is now a family physician in Calgary; Craig Snodgrass is mayor of High River; Chris Spearman was mayor of Lethbridge from 2013-2021; Avnish Nanda is a human rights lawyer in Edmonton and founder of Our Alberta Advantage, a campaign opposing the five immigration questions.