15/06/2026
đĄItâs been a conflicting day. Today's announcement that from spring 2027, children and young people under 16 will be "banned" from 10 "social media platforms" - Tiktok, Snapchat, IG, FB, Youtube, X, Reddit, Twitch, Threads and Kik - has made many online safety campaigning groups very happy.
However, as many of you may know, our driving purpose (while supporting as many children and families as possible with support and education) is to work with and protect vulnerable children and young people online.
While being very aware of the harms children are experiencing, we had to respond to last month's consultation with great care based on the experiences of the children we work with (and I'll link a summary of our response in the comments).
đ¨ Understanding the reality of young people's digital lives demonstrates the immediate complexities of a ban narrative - more than half of ALL the serious harm CyberSafe Scotland supported 9-12 year olds with last year occurred on WhatsApp, Roblox and Telegram - all platforms which are excluded from the ban. We urgently need to change how all platforms are designed above everything else.
Further, the âbanâ relies on the platforms bringing in effective âage assuranceâ. This officially came in in July last year. However since July last year, almost none of the children we work with have been prevented from accessing any of the platforms named. In Australia, it is estimated 70 per cent of children continue accessing multiple social media platforms despite the âbanâ. So for todayâs changes to have any impact at all there would need to be much stronger enforcement.
When the proposed changes occur - what is being offered in their place to support connection and engagement? However we feel about the ban, without a full plan for this children will inevitably move to spaces with equal or higher levels of risk which are arguably even harder to regulate. How are these spaces being going to be designed better and how will children feel if every new app that pops up either escapes the "ban" or is moved into it without a clear plan for something better?
Where is the clear acknowledgment of what is coming down the track with AI? Not just "romantic" chatbots, but how we design all AI to be safer for children and young people.
It's great to see more attention being given to protecting children from harm, and we do welcome the level of national conversation around the issues. That said, the issues are complex for the children we represent. Whatever happens, we will move forward to try to support all the children and families we work with, and all of you, as clearly as possible with the changes. Sorry not to have a more cheery post tonight but wanted to be real!