20/07/2026
No one in Dartford was asking for Local Government Reorganisation. But we got it anyway.
Earlier this year, the Government launched a consultation on the options available. It has now chosen Option 4B.
Option 4B carries significant financial risk and creates a council that is simply too large to be genuinely effective or local.
Every option on the table left Dartford worse off, just to varying degrees.
It is only right that residents are told how many people actually supported this option when they were forced to choose between them.
I have now submitted a Freedom of Information request to the Government, asking it to publish the full, anonymised results of the Kent and Medway Local Government Reorganisation consultation for people living in the Dartford Borough area.
The request covers every proposal considered:
Option 1A, Option 3A, Option 4B, Option 4D and Option 5A.
For every option and every consultation question, I have asked for the number of Dartford residents who selected each available response, from “strongly agree” to “strongly disagree”, as well as those who answered “don’t know” or skipped the question.
I have also asked for confirmation of the total number of responses received from Dartford, and whether any duplicate or repeat submissions were identified and removed.
This request does not seek anyone’s name, address, postcode, comments or other personal information. It asks only for anonymised, aggregate figures.
Similar geographical breakdowns have been published for other local government consultations, so I can see no good reason why this information should not be provided.
Once the Government responds, I will publish the figures in full.
Dartford residents deserve to know what people here actually said.