World Special Forces

World Special Forces Contact information, map and directions, contact form, opening hours, services, ratings, photos, videos and announcements from World Special Forces, Armed forces, RAF Credenhill, Hereford.

Dedicated to the Elite World of Special Forces including all Sub Units and every Regular Unit within the World Special Forces and it's Military's as well as Her Allies & our brothers in the United States of America.

???
30/07/2022

???

British and Norwegian SF Training Together Location Unknown... 🇬🇧☠️⚔️⚓️👍🇳🇴
30/07/2022

British and Norwegian SF Training Together Location Unknown... 🇬🇧☠️⚔️⚓️👍🇳🇴

Good Old British SAS in Norway - Mountain Troop Always Training…🇬🇧⚓️☠️⚔️☠️🇳🇴
30/07/2022

Good Old British SAS in Norway - Mountain Troop Always Training…🇬🇧⚓️☠️⚔️☠️🇳🇴

American Special Forces 1st Detachment Delta… The 1st Special Forces Operational Detachment–Delta, referred to variously...
15/07/2022

American Special Forces 1st Detachment Delta… The 1st Special Forces Operational Detachment–Delta, referred to variously as Delta Force, Combat Applications Group, "The Unit", or within JSOC, Task Force Green, is a special operations force of the United States Army, under operational control of the Joint Special Operations Command. The unit's missions primarily involve counter-terrorism, hostage rescue, direct action, and special reconnaissance, often against high-value targets. Delta Force and its Navy and Air Force counterparts, DEVGRU and the 24th Special Tactics Squadron, are among the U.S. military's "tier one" special mission units tasked with performing the most complex, covert, and dangerous missions directed by the National Command Authority.Wikipedia
Founded:
November 19, 1977
Type:
Special mission unit
Role:
Special operations
Size:
Classified, see below
Part of:
Joint Special Operations Command, U.S. Army Special Operations Command
Headquarters:
Fort Bragg, North Carolina, U.S.
Nickname(s):
The Unit, D'Boys
Decorations:
Presidential Unit Citation, Joint Meritorious Unit Award, Valorous Unit Award
Current, commander:
Classified
Notable, commanders:
Charles Alvin Beckwith, William F. Garrison, William G. Boykin, Peter J. Schoomaker, Eldon A. Bargewell, Gary L. Harrell, Bennet S. Sacolick, Austin S. Miller, Mark J. O'Neil, Christopher T. Donahue 🇺🇸☠️⚓️⚔️☠️🇺🇸

SAS unit repeatedly killed Afghan detainees, BBC finds…SAS operatives in Afghanistan repeatedly killed detainees and una...
12/07/2022

SAS unit repeatedly killed Afghan detainees, BBC finds…

SAS operatives in Afghanistan repeatedly killed detainees and unarmed men in suspicious circumstances, according to a BBC investigation.
Newly obtained military reports suggest that one unit may have unlawfully killed 54 people in one six-month tour.
The BBC found evidence suggesting the former head of special forces failed to pass on evidence to a murder inquiry.
The Ministry of Defence said British troops "served with courage and professionalism in Afghanistan".
The BBC understands that General Sir Mark Carleton-Smith, the former head of UK Special Forces, was briefed about the alleged unlawful killings but did not pass on the evidence to the Royal Military Police, even after the RMP began a murder investigation into the SAS squadron.
General Carleton-Smith, who went on to become head of the Army before stepping down last month, declined to comment for this story.
BBC Panorama analysed hundreds of pages of SAS operational accounts, including reports covering more than a dozen "kill or capture" raids carried out by one SAS squadron in Helmand in 2010/11.
Individuals who served with the SAS squadron on that deployment told the BBC they witnessed the SAS operatives kill unarmed people during night raids.
They also said they saw the operatives using so-called "drop weapons" - AK-47s planted at a scene to justify the killing of an unarmed person.
Several people who served with special forces said that SAS squadrons were competing with each other to get the most kills, and that the squadron scrutinised by the BBC was trying to achieve a higher body count than the one it had replaced.
Internal emails show that officers at the highest levels of special forces were aware there was concern over possible unlawful killings, but failed to report the suspicions to military police despite a legal obligation to do so.
The Ministry of Defence said it could not comment on specific allegations, but that declining to comment should not be taken as acceptance of the allegations' factual accuracy.
An MOD spokesperson said that British forces "served with courage and professionalism" in Afghanistan and were held to the "highest standards".

A pattern of suspicious killing
In 2019, the BBC and the Sunday Times investigated one SAS raid which led to a UK court case and an order to the UK defence minister to disclose documents outlining the government's handling of the case.
For this latest investigation, the BBC analysed newly obtained operational reports detailing the SAS's accounts of night raids. We found a pattern of strikingly similar reports of Afghan men being shot dead because they pulled AK-47 rifles or hand gr***des from behind curtains or other furniture after having been detained.
On 29 November 2010, the squadron killed a man who had been detained and taken back inside a building, where he "attempted to engage the force with a gr***de".
On 15 January 2011, the squadron killed a man who had been detained and taken back inside a building, where he "reached behind a mattress, pulled out a hand gr***de, and attempted to throw it".
On 7 February, the squadron killed a detainee who they said had "attempted to engage the patrol with a rifle". The same justification was given for the fatal shooting of detainees on 9 February and 13 February.
On 16 February, the squadron killed two detainees after one pulled a gr***de "from behind the curtains" and the other "picked up an AK-47 from behind a table".
On 1 April, the squadron killed two detainees who had been sent back inside a building after one "raised an AK-47" and the other "tried to throw a gr***de".
The total death toll during the squadron's six-month tour was in the triple figures. No injuries to SAS operatives were reported across all the raids scrutinised by the BBC.

A senior officer who worked at UK Special Forces headquarters told the BBC there was "real concern" over the squadron's reports.
"Too many people were being killed on night raids and the explanations didn't make sense," he said. "Once somebody is detained, they shouldn't end up dead. For it to happen over and over again was causing alarm at HQ. It was clear at the time that something was wrong."
Internal emails from the time show that officers reacted with disbelief to the reports, describing them as "quite incredible" and referring to the squadron's "latest massacre". An operations officer emailed a colleague to say that "for what must be the 10th time in the last two weeks" the squadron had sent a detainee back into a building "and he reappeared with an AK".
"Then when they walked back in to a different A [building] with another B [fighting-age male] to open the curtains he grabbed a gr***de from behind a curtain and threw it at the c/s [SAS assault team]. Fortunately, it didn't go off…. this is the 8th time this has happened... You couldn't MAKE IT UP!"
As the concerns grew, one of the highest-ranking special forces officers in the country warned in a secret memo that there could be a "deliberate policy" of unlawful killing in operation. Senior leadership became so concerned that a rare formal review was commissioned of the squadron's tactics. But when a special forces officer was deployed to Afghanistan to interview personnel from the squadron, he appeared to take the SAS version of events at face value.
The BBC understands that the officer did not visit any of the scenes of the raids or interview any witnesses outside the military. Court documents show that the final report was signed off by the commanding officer of the SAS unit responsible for the suspicious killings.

None of the evidence was passed on to military police. The BBC discovered that statements containing the concerns were instead put into a restricted-access classified file for "Anecdotal information about extrajudicial killings", accessible only to a handful of senior special forces officers.
In 2012, General Carleton-Smith was appointed head of UK special forces. The BBC understands that he was briefed about the suspicious killings, but he allowed the squadron to return to Afghanistan for another six-month tour.
When the Royal Military Police launched a murder investigation in 2013 into one of the raids conducted on that tour, General Carleton-Smith did not disclose to the RMP any of the earlier concerns over unlawful killings, or the existence of the tactical review.
Colonel Oliver Lee, who was commander of the Royal Marines in Afghanistan in 2011, told the BBC that the allegations of misconduct raised by our investigation were "incredibly shocking" and merited a public inquiry. The apparent failure by special forces leadership to disclose evidence was "completely unacceptable", he said.

Kill or capture
The BBC's investigation focused primarily on one six-month deployment by one SAS squadron that arrived in Afghanistan in November 2010.
The squadron was operating largely in Helmand province, one of the most dangerous places in Afghanistan, where Taliban ambushes and roadside bombs were common and Army losses were high.
The squadron's primary role was carrying out deliberate detention operations (DDOs) - also known as "kill or capture" raids - designed to detain Taliban commanders and disrupt bomb-making networks.

Several sources who were involved in selecting targets for special forces operations told the BBC that there were grave problems with the intelligence behind the selection process, meaning civilians could easily end up on a target list.
According to a British representative who was present during target selection in Helmand in 2011, "Intelligence guys were coming up with lists of people that they figured were Taliban. It would be put through a short process of discussion. That was then passed onto special forces who would be given a kill or capture order."
According to the source, the targeting was pressured and rushed. "It didn't necessarily translate into let's kill them all, but certainly there was a pressure to up the game, which basically meant passing out judgements on these people quickly," he said.

During the raids, the SAS squadron used a recognised tactic in which they called everyone from inside a building out, searched and restrained them with cable-tie handcuffs, then took one male back inside to assist special forces operatives with a search.
But senior officers became concerned by the frequency with which the squadron's own accounts described detainees being taken back inside buildings and then grabbing for hidden weapons - an enemy tactic not reported by other British military forces operating in Afghanistan.
There were also concerns among officers that on a significant number of raids, there were more people killed than weapons reportedly recovered from the scene - suggesting the SAS was shooting unarmed people - and that SAS operatives might be falsifying evidence by dropping weapons at scenes after killing people.
After similar concerns were raised in Australia, a judge-led inquiry was commissioned and found "credible evidence" members of Australian Special Forces were responsible for the unlawful killing 39 people, and used 'drop weapons' in an attempt to justify shootings.
By April 2011, the concerns were so great in the UK that a senior special forces officer wrote to the director of special forces warning that there was evidence of "deliberate killing of individuals after they have been restrained" and "fabrication of evidence to suggest a lawful killing in self-defence".
Two days later, the UK Special Forces assistant chief of staff warned the director that the SAS could be operating a policy to "kill fighting-aged males on target even when they did not pose a threat."
If the suspicions were true, he wrote, the SAS squadron had "strayed into indefensible ethical and legal behaviour".

The BBC visited several of the homes raided by the SAS squadron in 2010/11. At one, in a small village in Nad Ali in Helmand, there was a bricked up guesthouse where nine Afghan men including a teenager were killed in the early hours of 7 February 2011.
The SAS operatives arrived in helicopters under the cover of darkness and approached the house from a nearby field. According to their account, insurgents opened fire at them, prompting them to shoot back and kill everyone in the guesthouse.
Only three AK-47s were recovered, according to the SAS account - one of at least six raids by the squadron on which the reported number of enemy weapons was fewer than the number of people killed.
Inside the guesthouse, what appeared to be bullet holes from the raid were clustered together on the walls low to the ground. The BBC showed photographs from the scene to ballistics experts, who said that the clusters suggested multiple rounds had been fired downward from above, and did not appear indicative of a firefight.
Leigh Neville, an expert on weapons used by UK Special Forces, said the bullet patterns suggested that "targets were low to the ground, either prone or in a sitting or crouching position close to the wall - an unusual position if they were actively involved in a firefight".

The same pattern was visible at two other locations examined by the BBC. Ballistics experts who reviewed images said the bullet holes were suggestive of execution-style killings rather than firefights.
Speaking on condition of anonymity, an RMP investigator confirmed to the BBC that they had seen photographs from the scenes and that the bullet mark patterns had raised alarm.
"You can see why we were concerned," the investigator said. "Bullet marks on the walls so low to the ground appeared to undermine the special forces' version of events."
In 2014, the RMP launched Operation Northmoor, a wide-ranging investigation into more than 600 alleged offences by British forces in Afghanistan, including a number of killings by the SAS squadron. But RMP investigators told the BBC that they were obstructed by British military in their efforts to gather evidence.
Operation Northmoor was wound down in 2017 and eventually closed in 2019. The Ministry of Defence has said that no evidence of criminality was found. Members of the investigations team told the BBC they dispute that conclusion.
The Ministry of Defence said British troops were held to the highest standards. "No new evidence has been presented, but the Service Police will consider any allegations should new evidence come to light," a spokesperson said.
In a further statement, the MoD said it believed Panorama had jumped to "unjustified conclusions from allegations that have already been fully investigated".
It said: "We have provided a detailed and comprehensive statement to Panorama, highlighting unequivocally how two Service Police operations carried out extensive and independent investigation into allegations about the conduct of UK forces in Afghanistan.
"Neither investigation found sufficient evidence to prosecute. Insinuating otherwise is irresponsible, incorrect and puts our brave Armed Forces personnel at risk both in the field and reputationally.
"The Ministry of Defence of course stands open to considering any new evidence, there would be no obstruction. But in the absence of this, we strongly object to this subjective reporting."… On BBC Tonight at 9:00pm Channel 1… WDW 🇬🇧☠️⚔️⚓️☠️🇬🇧

WINTER SOLDIER SAS ‘Ghost Soldiers’ disappear into the snow in new Arctic warfare camouflage… 🇬🇧☠️⚔️🇬🇧THE SAS are famed ...
04/07/2022

WINTER SOLDIER SAS ‘Ghost Soldiers’ disappear into the snow in new Arctic warfare camouflage… 🇬🇧☠️⚔️🇬🇧

THE SAS are famed for their stealth but these amazing Arctic warfare pics show they have moved up to the next level.

The elite military unit's feared Mountain Troop appear almost invisible in their mind-boggling new winter camouflage kit.

The ghostly images show the specialist soldiers melting into the wintry background thanks to their white speckled clothing and equipment.

They are incredible images which will spark fear into the hearts of rogue states and terror groups around the world, reports the Star.

Experts in mountain climbing and arctic warfare, the troops are trained to survive and fight in even the most extreme conditions.

Their unique combat skills can be called on anywhere from the frozen hills of Norway to the mountains of Afghanistan.

During the cold war, they guarded Nato's northern flanks against an expected Soviet push.

Their skills were also put to the test during the 1982 Falklands conflict and, more recently, in the mountain ranges in the Taliban's homeland.

The unit is reported to contain some of the world's best and most fearless climbers.

One former member said: “Only the very best get to serve in Mountain Troop – you really have to be on top of your game.

“Everyone who passes SAS selection is regarded as an elite soldier, but only those who really shine get selected for the Mountain Troop.

“They were some of the first British soldiers to deploy to Afghanistan in the wake of the 9/11 attacks."

Earlier this year we revealed how a crack SAS unit has been placed in isolation so its troops can respond to coronavirus emergencies or terror attacks.

WDW… 🇬🇧☠️⚔️⚓️🇬🇧👍

‘Shaman’ special forces take the fight across the border into Russia…Rotor blades clattered in the night sky as the heli...
27/06/2022

‘Shaman’ special forces take the fight across the border into Russia…

Rotor blades clattered in the night sky as the helicopters streaked low over the Russian border. On board, the men of the Shaman battalion, an elite Ukrainian special forces unit, prepared to disembark deep behind enemy lines.
Their mission, to destroy infrastructure vital to the Kremlin’s war effort, was one of several covert raids inside Russia, The Times has been told by two of the operators who took part and an intelligence officer; the first time Ukrainian special forces have acknowledged taking the fight into Russian territory.
The exact targets are classified but the teams’ forays across the border help to explain how Russian oil refineries, ammunition depots and communications networks have been mysteriously sabotaged.
Sergeants “Handsome” and “Twenty Two”, both aged 25, have been fighting President Putin’s forces since his hybrid invasion of Ukraine in 2014. Intelligent, articulate and in peak physical condition, they were selected for the special forces after years of combat in regular units.
“The most interesting missions are working behind enemy lines; planting explosives behind the front lines, beyond the border,” said Twenty Two, detailing a plan to sow confusion and dissent among the enemy that he asked The Times not to disclose in full.
Handsome added: “The Russians don’t know what happened, they often can’t believe we were there.”
Both are members of Shaman battalion, a nickname given to Ukraine’s 10th Special Forces Detachment for its almost otherworldly abilities. It is the assault and reconnaissance arm of Ukrainian military intelligence, and it accepts only those men who pass the most gruelling tests of endurance and survival skills. The unit specialises in diving, parachuting and mountaineering.

It has fought alongside British and American troops in Afghanistan and earned a reputation as the crème de la crème of Ukraine’s special forces. “We send them to take on the most difficult tasks because they’re the best and the bravest,” said a senior Ukrainian intelligence officer. “They are hugely important to the war effort.”
Although the unit was better prepared for February’s invasion than other branches of the country’s armed forces, it still came as a shock, Handsome said. “Every day we had been told the invasion would start tomorrow, and then it didn’t come,” he said. “When it finally started I didn’t believe it.”
The men were thrown into battle immediately against their counterparts in the Russian Spetsnaz at Antonov airport in Hostomel, where helicopter-borne paratroopers were attempting to secure an air-supply route to armoured columns advancing on the Ukrainian capital. “We took positions in the hangars and the barracks, engaging in a four-hour firefight until we needed to rotate with some national guard units,” Handsome said. He described the first hour of the battle as chaos, as the Ukrainian military scrambled to co-ordinate its defence, but their efforts at the airport prevented Russia gaining a vital foothold outside Kyiv.
They then deployed to the village of Moshchun to prevent the enemy crossing the Irpin river, which would have given Putin’s forces a clear run on Kyiv. Three teams cleared the village and dug in to a forest along the river bank, where they waited for the attack. They fell back into the village buildings under heavy shelling as a far larger force backed by two infantry fighting vehicles began crossing the river. Although heavily outnumbered “as always”, the teams waited until the Russian troops were deep in the centre of the village before ambushing them, engaging in close-quarters combat and striking from both flanks.

“We were shooting from 5-10 metres away,” said Twenty Two. “We’re always trying to keep tight, to grab the belt of the enemy, because at that point they can’t use their artillery. They have a lot more artillery than us, but their morale is very low, they can’t engage in one-on-one combat. It’s psychologically very difficult to stand in a firefight where you’re using frag gr***des and underslung gr***de launchers.”
After routing the Russian troops and destroying the two armoured vehicles with British-supplied Nlaw anti-tank missiles, Shaman battalion withdrew from the village to regroup. “By this time it was around 10pm and we had no batteries left for our night vision,” Handsome said. “We heard that another force of 50 men and another armoured vehicle were moving towards the river.”
Again the Ukrainian teams moved into the village and waited quietly in the dark, listening for the sound of Russian footsteps. “My friend heard an officer order his troops to move into a tactical line, then they came at us screaming and shouting,” said Handsome. “But they made a mistake and did the same thing, coming into the centre of the village. So we killed them all too.”

Shaman battalion was involved in every big engagement in the battle for Kyiv, and continued to harass the invasion force as it fled through the Chernobyl exclusion zone back across the Belarusian border.
Special forces have formed the backbone of Ukraine’s defences, often organising freshly mobilised troops who are highly motivated but undertrained and ill-equipped. The operators described having to instruct regular units on taking up the best defensive positions to cover an assault before moving in to lead an attack themselves. “Right now there aren’t enough resources to cover all the tasks we need. We have the people but we don’t have enough resources to give everyone the right weapons,” said Twenty Two. “This is a war of artillery and aviation, we need more of both.”
Inexperienced infantry needed to be bolstered by experienced operators in order to hold the line under fierce bombardment, he added. “Until we have resources, the special forces are coming and organising the war on a section of front line. We’re taking the communications, the medevacs, going in before the infantry and after the infantry, we’re co-ordinating every element in this area.”
Ukraine’s reliance on its special forces has taken a heavy toll on the units themselves, he said: half of their friends have been killed in recent weeks as the battle for the Donbas region grinds on, with Russia focusing its air power and superior artillery on a small segment of the front line. The unnamed intelligence officer agreed: Ukraine’s casualty rate, far lower than Russia’s in the first weeks of the war, is now approaching parity with the invading force, he said.
The operators are grateful for western weapons supplies, upgrading their AKMs to FN SCAR-L rifles, among other things, but said the intensity of operations was costing them more equipment than was arriving. They called for faster deliveries of military aid, particularly vehicles, Nlaws and heavy weapons.
The men gave an example of a high-tempo mission behind enemy lines where they had to abandon two vehicles with blown-out tyres because they had no time to change them. “People are using anything with wheels, even their own cars,” Twenty Two said. “I’m having to hold my night-vision goggles up to my eyes because the helmet attachment has broken off and I can’t find a replacement.”
He was hit by a frag gr***de last Sunday while storming a Russian trench but has left the shrapnel inside his forearm, covered only by a large plaster, rather than pause operations. “We’re trying to creep up, use stealth to get close. It’s very difficult, you have a lot of equipment, you need a lot of ammo, it’s very heavy and when you’re trying to crawl, it’s very noisy.
“But we achieved surprise. The first guy that saw me, he lost himself, he didn’t expect us, he was afraid and I just shot him from maybe 7m away, underneath the [ballistic] plate carrier. You’re always shooting at the balls, there is not enough protection there. It’s 100 per cent to kill the enemy: you’re destroying his arteries and breaking his pelvis. He cannot escape, he cannot run, he cannot crawl, he cannot do anything. It’s impossible to give first aid to a man wounded in this area. You can’t use a tourniquet or bandage.”
He is unnervingly calm as he describes the best way to kill; the words of a young man who has come of age fighting the Russians and for whom violence has become normalised. “I went to war at 18, I didn’t see a different world, I didn’t see peace. From the start of my adult life, I’ve seen only this, so I don’t have any different picture of life,” Twenty Two said. “You can’t even imagine how many young people, 18 or 19, are signing up now to join the army. They might have one rifle and one magazine but they are going forward, just because it’s needed. It reminds me of us at that age and we realise the next generation is going to grow up with war too. That’s Russia’s fault.”
Before the invasion Twenty Two had begun planning to set up a chain of gyms. Handsome was expecting to go into Ukraine’s blossoming IT industry, build a house and start a family. Now they are focused solely on defending the motherland.
“Everybody has his own motivation. Somebody has a wife, somebody already doesn’t have a wife, some people have family in occupied Kherson, or under Russian artillery in Mykolaiv,” Twenty Two said. “My motivation is to fight to see something different, to see a civilian life. For the next generation to not have to fight a Russian war.”
It’s a profound statement from one so young. “I’m about to turn 26,” he said. “At least I hope so.”… 🇺🇦☠️⚔️⚓️🇺🇦

Russia is building a futuristic combat suit it claims can stop .50 caliber bulletsGet ready for a fourth generation of R...
25/06/2022

Russia is building a futuristic combat suit it claims can stop .50 caliber bullets
Get ready for a fourth generation of Rostec's Sotnik battle armor…

The Russian defense industrial base is purportedly throwing its resources into yet another next-generation super-suit for Russian soldiers to rush into combat with.

State-owned defense giant Rostec announced on Friday that the corporation was leading the charge to develop the fourth generation of its vaunted Sotnik, or ‘Centurion,’ battle armor.

The current third-generation Sotnik suit currently includes the “entirely new personal protective equipment and ammunition, offering light armor defense and increasing the soldier’s armament by several times,” according to the Jamestown Foundation.

“The new generation gear will consist of a fundamentally new set of technology, including the latest achievements of the Russian defense industry, including robotic equipment and integrated systems for exchanging information,” according to Rostec’s Bekkhan Ozdoev. “Today we have started the first stage of development – the definition of tactical and technical requirements.”

While Rostec’s official release was vague regarding the specifics of the new system, Ozdoev had previously stated the fourth-generation Sotnik armor will consist of lightweight polyethylene fiber and armor plating that is engineered to withstand a direct shot from a .50 caliber M2 Browning. “The gear will not restrict movement and will allow you to take the extra weight necessary to perform special missions,” according to Ozdoev.

While the prospect of a futuristic battle suit capable of shrugging off a .50 caliber round seems like something out of science fiction, the Russian military is “totally serious about this,” said Samuel Bendett, a research analyst focused on Russian military developments at the Center for Naval Analyses.

Indeed, the current third-generation Sotnik gear that Rostec is currently developing is itself intended to replace the high-tech Ratnik, or ‘Warrior,’ combat gear — which has been in development for more than a decade and seen combat within the last five years — by sometime in 2025.

The Ratnik suit, which consists of 10 subsystems and 59 individual components, includes modernized body armor designed to withstand 7.62mm rounds, a helmet with a special eye monitor outfitted with a thermal night vision monocular and flashlight, and integrated communication systems. It “also features a self-contained heater, a backpack, an individual water filter, a gas mask, and a medical kit,” according to Army Technology.

More than 300,000 sets of the various iterations of the Ratnik combat gear have already been delivered to the Russian Ministry of Defense in the last eight years, according to the corporation.

While Rosetec isn’t explicitly saying how long research and development will take for the Sotnik combat suit, the company has “a lot to build on” now that two generations of Ratnik battle armor has been combat-tested by Russian forces, Bendett said.

Indeed, the feasibility of the Sotnik is directly related to the success of the Ratnik, according to Bendett, so far that the ‘integrated systems for exchanging information’ element that Ozdoev highlighted “is also not new and will probably build on” existing tactical systems currently in service.

Some futuristic capabilities actually do appear within arm’s reach. Rostec in September unveiled a specialized exoskeleton for the Ratnik battle suit designed to bear 80 kilograms (176 pounds) for the average soldier and a fresh ‘Stormer’ combat exoskeleton designed to haul 60 kilograms (132 pounds) during assault operations.

‘There are certain technologies that will realistically be developed first,” Bendett explained. “Others are just at concept stages.”

When Rostec plans on unveiling a next-generation Sotnik system remains to be seen. What is clear, however, is that the Russian military appears to be beating the pants off of the U.S. when it comes to future infantry combat systems.

Indeed, the Pentagon has been pursuing the dream of a powered exoskeleton for nearly a half-century, with its latest effort, U.S. Special Operations Command’s Tactical Assault Light Operator Suit (TALOS), failing to yield a fully-integrated suit of combat armor following its unveiling in 2019.

Where the U.S. has remained stymied by system integration issues, Russia has benefitted in its exoskeleton development from its ability to field test such gear in its weapons playground of war-torn Syria, as Bendett previously told Task & Purpose.

At the moment, the U.S. military is still playing catching up: The Army is currently in the process of sussing out requirements for a brand-new exoskeleton to help soldiers ruck faster and harder while reducing fatigue. Whether they can catch up to the speed of Russian developments remains to be seen.

Address

RAF Credenhill
Hereford
HR47DD

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when World Special Forces posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The Organisation

Send a message to World Special Forces:

Share

Category