Sarju Patel - Criminal Defence Specialist - Right To Remain Silent

Sarju Patel - Criminal Defence Specialist - Right To Remain Silent Criminal Defence Expert Lawyer & Crown Court Litigator at Noble Solicitors. 20+ yrs experience. Real talk on rights, arrests & interviews.

I speak so you don’t slip. 🎥 Know your rights | 📞 24/7 defence | Serious Crime Specialist

07/06/2026

🚔 A real police station result from this week.

My client was arrested for being drunk in charge. At the end of the interview, the police served a Section 172 notice and told my client she would be reported for consideration of prosecution after we declined to complete it.

Rather than simply accepting that decision, I challenged it and made formal legal representations.

The result is in the email below:

✅ No further action regarding the Section 172 requirement.✅ No adverse inference from the non-response.✅ No separate proceedings.

This is what criminal defence is about. Asking questions, challenging decisions and making sure your client's rights are protected.

Credit to the investigating officer, who listened to those representations and acted fairly.

Never assume the first answer is the final answer. Make sure your lawyer is always fighting your corner.

Shared with personal details removed. This post is for general information only and does not constitute legal advice. Every case depends on its own facts.

02/06/2026

🚨 Henry Nowak was 18 years old. The killer has been convicted. The police watchdog investigation is ongoing. What’s your view on the officers’ actions? 👇

20/05/2026


Check out Sarju Patel - Criminal Defence’s video.

20/05/2026

A 26-year-old British Asian software engineer was arrested at his parents’ home and locked in a police cell for nearly 10 hours after a facial recognition system wrongly identified him as a burglary suspect from 100 miles away.

When officers later reviewed the CCTV properly, it became clear the suspect looked nothing like him.

This is exactly why there needs to be serious discussion around live facial recognition technology.

Most people agree that technology can help policing, locate dangerous offenders and even help find missing persons. But what happens when the system gets it wrong?

Because when it gets it wrong, the consequences are real:
• You can be handcuffed
• Arrested
• Taken into custody
• Have your reputation damaged
• Experience stress, embarrassment and trauma — despite being innocent

The issue is not whether technology should exist. The issue is whether there are proper safeguards, human checks, transparency and accountability before someone loses their liberty.

Rights and protections are not just for guilty people. They are there to protect innocent people from mistakes too.

Technology should assist policing — not replace proper investigation and common sense.

What are your thoughts on live facial recognition being used in public spaces?

15/05/2026

People love saying criminal defence lawyers “just want money” or “want the case to go to court.”

Reality? One of the core principles under the Solicitors Regulation Authority Standards and Regulations is:

⚖️ Principle 7 — act in the best interests of each client.

Most of my best outcomes are:
✅ NFA
✅ No charge
✅ No court case
✅ No criminal record

Which usually means LESS money because the case ends early.

The real work often happens at the police station long before anyone steps inside a courtroom.

14/05/2026

Did you know in the UK you don’t actually have a right to a phone call? You actually have the right to have someone informed.

12/05/2026

I represented a client in police interview.

We answered questions.
We advanced a defence.
He denied the offence.

Later, I chased police for an update…

Only to be told my client was booked in to accept a CAUTION.

STOP THERE. 🚨

Hang on officer…

A caution for WHAT exactly?

Because for a caution to be lawful, there must be a clear admission of the offence.

That had NOT happened.

The officer was adamant my client had “made admissions” in interview.

I pushed back immediately.

No he didn’t.

Answering questions is NOT the same as admitting an offence.

Advancing a defence is NOT an admission.

We refused the caution.

Police response?

“Fine — we’ll send it to CPS and look at charging.”

So I made formal representations:
⚖️ Challenged the legal test
⚖️ Challenged the interpretation of the interview
⚖️ Challenged the stalking classification
⚖️ Challenged the bail extension
⚖️ Sent detailed pre-charge reps to CPS

Final result?

✅ NO FURTHER ACTION.

Moral of the story:
Never let anyone pressure you into accepting a caution without proper legal advice.

Because once you accept it…
you’re admitting the offence.

06/05/2026

AKON

06/05/2026

Charged with Attempt murder - basis of plea for S18 accepted.

It’s not always about getting people off. It can be about damage limitation too…

https://vm.tiktok.com/ZNRpWKMYh/

Address

London

Website

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Sarju Patel - Criminal Defence Specialist - Right To Remain Silent posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The Organisation

Send a message to Sarju Patel - Criminal Defence Specialist - Right To Remain Silent:

Shortcuts

Share

Category