The Battle of Bannockburn NTS

The Battle of Bannockburn NTS Visitor centre and outdoor monuments commemorating the Battle of Bannockburn. Cared for by National Trust for Scotland.
(642)

  in 1307 King Robert scored his first victory against the English in battle near Loudoun Hill in Ayrshire. Though small...
10/05/2026

in 1307 King Robert scored his first victory against the English in battle near Loudoun Hill in Ayrshire. Though small in scale, this was the first time in a war that had dragged on for eleven years already that a King of Scots had led soldiers into battle and emerged victorious, singling Bruce out as a serious threat to English ambitions in Scotland than his rivals had been.

Bruce had lost the first two battles he fought as king in 1306 & during the following winter he disappears from the surviving record altogether. He likely spent this time travelling the Hebrides & the Western Highlands raising a new army from among the local Gaelic-speaking population. Around February 1307 he returned to Carrick - his childhood home - & mustered what support he could there. His early efforts to disrupt English lordship in the south-west were still fairly desultory however, including a fumbled ambush on the English treasurer at Glen Trool in April.

Having apparently received intelligence that the English Guardian of Scotland - Aymer de Valence, earl of Pembroke - was advancing eastwards roughly along what is now the A71, Bruce dug up the ground on either side of the road, creating three parallel lines of ditches that would force the English to face the Scots on the road. According to the later Scottish poet John Barbour, the Scots were outnumbered 6 to 1, but between the ditches the English would have to face the Scots 1-on-1. If the Scots were overrun at the first ditch, they could retreat to the second, and then again to the third if need be.

In the event, the mounted vanguard of Valence's force appears to have charged the Scots at the first ditch & were repulsed, after which the English withdrew to Ayr. This led a contemporary English observer to complain that Valence 'had retreated before King Hobbe [i.e., Bruce] without doing any exploit'. Nevertheless, the fact that Bruce had inflicted even this minor reversal on an English army made many Scots - such as James Douglas, whose attempts to negotiate with the English crown for the restoration of his lands abruptly stopped after Loudoun Hill - view Bruce as a promising candidate as King of Scots.

The Battle of Loudoun Hill serves as the dramatic climax of the 2018 film 'Outlaw King'. The film gets a lot correct about the battle, including Bruce's anticipation of the English approach & the staggered ditches. It does, however, fudge a number of details. For example, in the film the English charge the ditches, rather than charging at the Scots on the road (admittedly, this serves as a powerful illustration of *why* the English wouldn't charge the ditches). Also, the film has Edward II present at the battle. In reality, he was not only not there, he would not become king until July 1307.

On this day in 1326 the Treaty of Corbeil was drawn up. This proposed the renewal of the alliance between Scotland and F...
26/04/2026

On this day in 1326 the Treaty of Corbeil was drawn up. This proposed the renewal of the alliance between Scotland and France that had originally been arranged in 1295.

In simple terms, the Scots agreed to make war on England if the English attacked France, and the French king - Charles IV, who was the English king Edward II's brother-in-law - promised to make war on England if the English renewed their war with Scotland (at the time Scotland and England were a little over three years into what was meant to be a thirteen-year truce). Most importantly from King Robert's perspective, this represented a formal recognition by the powerful and influential King of France of his status as King of Scots - 'Robert, by the grace of God, King of Scots' ('Robert par la grace de Dieu roi Descoce') as the treasty styles him.

King Robert's nephew Thomas Randolph, earl of Moray, travelled to Corbeil near Paris for the negotiations, accompanied by James Ben, Archdeacon of St Andrews, Master Adam Murray, and Master Walter of Twynholm (who would later serve as chancellor). However, the treaty was ratified by a Scottish parliament at Cambuskenneth Abbey in July. This was only the second time Bruce is known to have held at parliament at Cambuskenneth, the first having been in November 1314 in the wake of his victory here at Bannockburn.

The choice of Cambuskenneth suggests a deliberate effort by Bruce to tie this latest diplomatic success to his earlier military success at Bannockburn. It seems the king wanted his subjects to view the French king's eventual acknowledgement of his royal rights as being a consequence of his achievements as a war leader, which had forced the English into accepting a truce in 1323 and created space for his diplomatic efforts on the Continent to bear fruit.

Happy   everyone! King Robert was frequently the subject of rumour & gossip during his lifetime.Bruce may have learned t...
21/04/2026

Happy everyone! King Robert was frequently the subject of rumour & gossip during his lifetime.

Bruce may have learned to court controversy from his mum, Marjory. When Marjory married Robert's father c. 1272, 'the popular opinion of the entire kingdom asserted that she had taken the young man (i.e., Robert's dad) as her husband by force'! In fact, Marjory may simply have been trying to circumvent Alexander III's plans to arrange a marriage for her against her own preferences.

Rumours also circulated about Bruce's relationship with Isabella, countess of Buchan. After Isabella assisted in Bruce's inauguration ceremony in March 1306, a contemporary English poet claimed she had 'transgressed against the bed of her husband, & burned with lust after the crowned fool, calling him 'Daffy''. More likely, Isabella was motivated by a genuine desire to preserve Scotland's independence than any 'lust' for Robert.

At a parliament at Scone in December 1318, King Robert explicitly 'decreed & forbad that anyone should be a conspirator or an inventor of tales or rumours by which a source of discord shall be able to arise between the lord king & his people. And if anyone such shall be found & attainted he should be immediately arrested & sent to the king’s prison & be kept there securely until the lord king shall command his will concerning him'. This was shortly after Bruce had been excommunicated for a second time & his younger brother Edward Bruce had been killed in battle, raising serious questions over the future of the Bruce dynasty. This had emboldened some of Bruce's remaining domestic opponents & the king was trying to limit the ability of these individuals to foment further dissatisfaction with his rule.

Even the circumstances of Bruce's death were the subject of rumour. Several hostile writers - the Lanercost chronicler, Jean le Bel, & Sir Thomas Gray - claim that the illness that killed King Robert was leprosy. We must be cautious about accepting this uncritically, however, since leprosy was seen in the fourteenth-century as the judgment of God against his enemies. These writers may thus have been using this to blacken Bruce's posthumous reputation. The only Scottish writer to offer an explanation for Bruce's final illness is John Barbour, who in the 1370s claimed the king contracted it 'throuch his cald lying/Quhen in his gret myscheiff wes he'. This is plausible enough, since Bruce likely first contracted the illness in the winter of 1307 while he was besieging Banff Castle.

Happy   everyone!   King Robert employed a Milanese physician named Maino de Maineri during the final years of his life?...
07/04/2026

Happy everyone! King Robert employed a Milanese physician named Maino de Maineri during the final years of his life?

King Robert first fell ill with the illness that would kill him in late 1307. What precisely this illness was in unclear. Some hostile sources say it was leprosy, which was seen as the judgement of God against his enemies. A later Scottish account claims that, whatever the illness was, he caught it 'throuch his cald lying', i.e., the during the years he had spent living rough while on campaign. The symptoms would come & go throughout his reign, but from around 1326 his health was in terminal decline.

We know the highly-literate Maineri was employed as Bruce's physician during this time because in 1360 he composed a work called 'Liber medicinalibus octo tractatu' ('The Book of 8 Medical Treatises) in which he wrote:

'I am certain that this fish [eels] should not be eaten because I have seen it during the time I was with the king of the Scots, Robert Bruce, who risked many dangers by eating eels, which are by nature like lampreys.'

Maineri's problem with eels was that they were 'caught in muddy & corrupt waters' & are 'analogous in water to the snake on earth...[&] may be venomous'. He therefore recommends that eels be covered in gelatine & spices then boiled twice in wine & again water before being eaten.

Dr Caroline Proctor of St Andrews University has traced Maineri's career in some detail. Maineri was teaching at the University of Paris in 1326 & was presumably approached while there to take up the appointment as Bruce's physician. He was paid £24 annually, with this money coming from the customs taken at Perth, where he also stayed for at least two years with a local burgess named John Aylebot. Maineri was also given half of the land of Kinfauns in Perthshire, the revenues from which would have further augmented his income while in Scotland. When at court, Maineri was attended by his own squire, a wardrobe-keeper, & a page, indicating the considerable prestige he was afforded. He then returned to the University of Paris after Bruce's death in 1329 before eventually finding employment with the Visconti family in his native Milan.

Robert also employed a Gaelic-speaking physician named Gille Pàdraig Beaton, described by the king as 'our chief physician-surgeon' ('capitali medico nostro surgerie') in 1324. Beaton was one of an entire kindred of courtly physicians who served generations of Scottish kings as well as other secular lords, particularly in the west of Scotland where Gaelic was the predominant language. The surname 'Beaton' was derived from 'MacBheathadh', meaning 'son of life' in Gaelic, which reflected their hereditary role in preserving the lives of their patrons.

  in 1320, the 'Declaration of Arbroath' was produced. Ostensibly a letter from the barons of Scotland to Pope John XXII...
06/04/2026

in 1320, the 'Declaration of Arbroath' was produced. Ostensibly a letter from the barons of Scotland to Pope John XXII expressing their support for Robert Bruce, it has become one of the most famous documents in Scottish history.

Pope Clement V died in April 1314 & his successor John XXII was not elected until August 1316. After this two-year 'interregnum', Pope John was eager to forcefully re-establish papal authority & he sought to do so by intervening as a peace broker in the long-running war between Scotland & England. However, his refusal to address Bruce as King of Scots created tensions between John & Robert. In 1318, Pope John excommunicated Bruce (the second time this had occurred) & placed Scotland under interdict, meaning that anyone supporting Bruce would also be considered excommunicate too.

Bruce still enjoyed the support of the Scottish clergy, which helped him survive his first excommunication & continued to help him now. However, the threat of excommunication (& eventual damnation) emboldened his domestic enemies to act against him. The 'Declaration' was thus an attempt by the Bruce royal administration to present a greater degree of political cohesion than was strictly accurate at the time. Several of those named in the text are known to have had prior Balliol or Comyn connections, suggesting that their inclusion may have been a kind of 'loyalty test'. The claim that Robert were to fail in his kingly duties, the barons would 'would make another our king, who would provide for our defence' had more to do with justifying Bruce's forceful replacement of his predecessor John Balliol than with expressing any kind of nascent democratic feeling among the Scots.

The 'Declaration' was not especially successful in its original aim. Several of those named within the text would be executed in August 1320 for plotting against King Robert (pouring further doubt on the barons' ability to 'make another our king'). It would not be until 1329 that the interdict was finally lifted. Nevertheless, the 'Declaration' continued to have significant symbolic value for generations of Scots. For example, Prof Dauvit Broun has identified several fifteenth-century copies, & it is reproduced in full in Walter Bower's Scotichronicon, composed in the 1440s.

We're delighted to announce that we are eggs-tending our Easter Trail for an eggs-tra day! 🐣Our trails will now be avail...
05/04/2026

We're delighted to announce that we are eggs-tending our Easter Trail for an eggs-tra day! 🐣
Our trails will now be available on Monday 6th April from 11am to 3:30pm.
Each trail sheet costs £5, with each completed sheet being exchanged for a chocolate prize! 🍫
The trail sheet can be purchased at our front desk, with the trail taking place outdoors, so sensible footwear is recommended. 🌦
If you also wish to book one of our battle experience tours, these set off every hour on the hour and be will charged at the usual rates. ⚔
We look forward to welcoming everybunny for an additional day of Easter fun! 🐰

Who else is getting egg-cited for Easter?We certainly are over at The Battle of Bannockburn!🐣Our trail takes place on th...
31/03/2026

Who else is getting egg-cited for Easter?
We certainly are over at The Battle of Bannockburn!🐣
Our trail takes place on the 4th and 5th of April from 11am to 3:30pm.
Each trail sheet costs £5, with each completed sheet being exchanged for a chocolate prize.🍫
The trail sheet can be purchased from the ticket desk, and will be taking place outdoors, so don’t forget your wellies if it rains!🌦️
If you also wish to book onto one of our battle experience tours, these will be charged at the usual rates.⚔️
We look forward to welcoming everybunny!🐰

For  , we have been exploring the lives of various women who were in some way connected to the battle. Today, to bring t...
31/03/2026

For , we have been exploring the lives of various women who were in some way connected to the battle. Today, to bring the series to a close, we thought we'd attempt to draw together some of the key threads that have emerged & reflect on what (we hope) these posts have demonstrated.

Firstly, we must acknowledge the difficulty in reconstructing accurate or even convincing biographies for many of the women we have looked at in the last month. Some are known only from a single reference. Some can only be conjectured to have existed. Some are even fictional! This can be a problem for men as well as women when it comes to medieval history. But the problem is undoubtedly exacerbated when the subject of our study is a woman.

It is also important to emphasise the diversity of women's experiences in fourteenth-century. They were not all damsels or victims. Many were active & capable participants in contemporary politics. Often what we know about them is shaped by their relationships to the men in their lives. But we have seen many women who worked hard to ensure that their interests were not *constrained* by these same men, & many were successful in doing so. Sometimes their stories are tragic, but their lives could also be joyous, inspiring, & sometimes even funny.

We have done our best in this series to focus on stories that emphasise the variety & complexity of women's lives in medieval Scotland & England. While we wish to acknowledge the struggles many women experienced in pursuit of their interests & the difficulties faced by modern historians in reconstructing these women's stories, we hope that these posts challenge common assumptions about how uniformly grim life was for women in the fourteenth-century & demonstrate that there were many ways for medieval women to express their agency.

Address

Glasgow Road, Whins Of Milton
Stirling
FK70LJ

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when The Battle of Bannockburn NTS posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The Organisation

Send a message to The Battle of Bannockburn NTS:

Share