13/09/2021
"Do or die" and "All die be die": Which one is Justified?
**********************************************
There's so much talk about former president Mahama's comment. I have not listened to him myself because I have been avoiding the mainstream media.
I have also not followed much of the media commentary. Nonetheless, I have my own opinion just like many of you.
When the NPP said the 2024 elections is a done deal, it doesn't not portend anything sinister to anyone. So, there was no call to order. But "do or die" comment means hell and brimstone which the pronouncer must quickly be called to order.
Prior to the 2020 elections, there was no such pronouncements. Our president did not repeat his "all die be die" mantra. Ex-president Mahama didn't say anything either, to incite violence. But people lost their lives needlessly. And the government referred to those who lost their lives as criminals. People get violent without necessarily being told. Therefore it's not about pronouncements. One may argue that it gives impetus to people with inherent violent tendency to engage in violence.
The fact still remains that the united SC, in the opinion of many objective-minded people, didn't do a good job in their handling of the entire election petition case. This, in my opinion, is the basis of ex-president Mahama's "do or die" comment. When you have a situation where the referee decided to become a player for one side, you're left with no choice but to play in manner that you consider fair enough to help you win. In any case, elections, we have been told, are won at polling stations.
In the "all die be die" mantra, the then candidate Akuffo-Addo premised his pronouncements on a violent incidence his political party engaged in at Atiwa. That was the basis of his comment. He did not take any matter to court the outcome of which might have warranted such pronouncement as in the case of Mahama.
So, the context of the pronouncements by the two statesmen are absolutely not the same! One was based on a conviction that united SC failed in all the processes culminating in its final ruling in the 2020 election petition case, while the other was based purely on violent act they perpetrated in one of their strongholds.
The impression that has been created to suggest that some group of people have monopoly over violence is so ignominiously mind-boggling. They feel they have the right to say or do anything and nobody dares touch them or tell them to apologize. But if another group dares to say/do same or similar, they must be called to order is hypocritically pathetic!
_zdn
Note: Dear reader, You're not under compulsion to comment if you cannot do any better contextual analysis than I have done. It's a good feeling for me to learn from people who know better than I do. Thank you.