People's National Congress Reform

Call Directions Website Contact the organization

People's National Congress Reform We are not just a party; we are a movement. A movement for justice, a movement for development, a movement for the people!

The Name of the Organization is the People’s National Congress; hereinafter referred to as “the Party.” Its headquarters shall be known as “Congress Place”. As a democratic organization, the Party believes that all persons are entitled to live a full, productive and happy life. Membership of the Party is open to all Guyanese regardless of ethnic origin, cultural background, geographic location or religious persuasion. The Party opposes all forms of racism, discrimination, intolerance and oppression.

22/10/2026
21/10/2026

Advancing The Cause with Hon.Coretta McDonald, AA, M.P

PRESS STATEMENTMV BARIMA INQUIRY: THE EVIDENCE REPORTED FROM THE HEARINGS RAISES DISTURBING QUESTIONS.A Partnership for ...
21/10/2026

PRESS STATEMENT

MV BARIMA INQUIRY: THE EVIDENCE REPORTED FROM THE HEARINGS RAISES DISTURBING QUESTIONS.

A Partnership for National Unity (APNU) calls on the Commission of Inquiry into the MV Barima tragedy to bring before it the ministers responsible for the maritime sector, including Juan Edghill and Deodat Indar in relation to their responsibilities during the period under investigation. Accountability must extend through MARAD’s leadership to the ministers and Government responsible for policy, supervision, resources and institutional preparedness.

The families who lost loved ones, the survivors and the Guyanese public deserve a full examination of the decisions that preceded this tragedy and the readiness of the institutions entrusted with protecting lives.

The evidence reported from the hearings raises disturbing questions: safety drills reportedly not conducted; the absence of formal maintenance systems and operating manuals; an unregistered emergency beacon; a rescue vessel losing internet communications without a backup; and limitations affecting night searches. Testimony that none of the 26 survivors rescued by one Coast Guard team was wearing a life jacket demands a clear explanation of how safety equipment was made accessible and emergency instructions provided. These disclosures remain subject to the Commission’s assessment, but their seriousness cannot be dismissed.

Particularly troubling is the reported evidence that Coast Guard standard operating procedures had not been updated during the Commander’s three-year tenure. The inquiry also heard that joint search-and-rescue exercises had not been conducted, with the Commander reportedly saying there had been no need. Preparedness cannot depend on waiting for a major disaster. Regular exercises are how institutions identify weaknesses before lives are lost.

The ministers responsible must be brought before the inquiry to give evidence and answer questions.

The public servants, technical personnel and operational officers now answering questions serve below the level of ministers and the Government. Their testimony is necessary, but it cannot substitute for scrutiny of those who direct policy, approve priorities and oversee institutional performance.

Minister Edghill’s legal representation at the inquiry is already a matter of public record. Representation by counsel does not replace personal testimony about ministerial decisions, knowledge and oversight.

MARAD, as the maritime regulator, must account for its inspections, certification, enforcement and oversight. What deficiencies were identified? What corrective action was required? Who verified compliance? What information reached the ministers, and what did they do with it?

The ministers and Government must explain how maintenance, staffing, qualifications, rescue training, communications and emergency readiness were prioritised and funded. Where warnings or requests for resources existed, the inquiry must establish who received them and how they responded.

The ferry’s crew and operational staff must not be made scapegoats for failures extending through regulatory and political leadership. Every person’s conduct should be assessed fairly on the evidence. Responsibility must follow the full chain of authority, including MARAD, the supervising ministries and the Government.

APNU also demands an immediate answer to a question affecting everyone who continues to travel by water:

Since the MV Barima tragedy, has the Government corrected maritime safety, search-and-rescue and emergency-readiness standard operating procedures—and tested whether those corrections work?

The Government must publish the changes made, their implementation dates, the officers responsible and the training and exercises completed. It must explain whether distress beacons have been checked for registration, backup communications tested, life-saving equipment inspected, and passenger and cargo controls strengthened.

Passengers continue to depend on these services while the inquiry proceeds. Their safety cannot wait for the final report.

Publicly shared coverage of survivors and bereaved families reflects demands for answers, recovery of the vessel and meaningful accountability. Those families must receive regular information and practical access to the proceedings. Their grief must be met with respect and action.

APNU warns Guyanese that the institutional weaknesses emerging from this inquiry raise fundamental questions about the Government’s stewardship of oil wealth. A country boasting unprecedented resources must invest in qualified personnel, competent regulators, maintained equipment, reliable communications and rehearsed emergency systems.

In APNU’s assessment, the Government has failed to demonstrate that it is converting Guyana’s oil revenues into the institutional strength and human capacity our expanded financial resources demand. Expenditure announcements provide no assurance that institutions can protect citizens when an emergency occurs.

The Commission must pursue the evidence through every level of responsibility. The ministers must answer. MARAD must account. The Government must demonstrate what it has corrected.

The victims deserve truth. Their families deserve accountability. Every passenger deserves a safer journey.

END

21/10/2026

Same Things, Different Days with Hon. Coretta McDonald,. AA, M.P.

GOVERNMENT MUST CHANGE COURSE AS GUYANA’S RULE OF LAW AND FREEDOMS COME UNDER SCRUTINY.Government must stop dismissing t...
21/10/2026

GOVERNMENT MUST CHANGE COURSE AS GUYANA’S RULE OF LAW AND FREEDOMS COME UNDER SCRUTINY.

Government must stop dismissing the warning signs and begin rebuilding public confidence in our institutions.

The latest report by the World Justice Project (WJP), reported by Kaieteur News on October 21, 2026, must serve as a wake-up call for the Government of Guyana. The country cannot continue to boast about economic growth and oil wealth while concerns about the rule of law, fundamental freedoms, accountability and the exercise of state power demand serious attention.

As a Member of Parliament, I call on the Government to change course and commit to meaningful reforms that strengthen democratic institutions, protect the rights of citizens and ensure that those entrusted with public power are held accountable.

Economic growth must never become a substitute for democratic progress. A country’s development must be measured not only by the money it earns, the buildings it constructs or the roads it lays, but also by whether its citizens can speak freely, access justice, question those in authority and expect the law to be applied fairly, regardless of political affiliation, social standing or economic influence.

The World Justice Project’s assessment is particularly important because the rule of law is the foundation upon which public trust, responsible government and investor confidence are built. Guyana must take these assessments seriously and address any shortcomings with urgency, transparency and a willingness to reform.

WHERE THE PROBLEM LIES?

1. Freedom of expression and the treatment of critics.

A democracy cannot flourish when citizens, journalists, civil society organisations and opposition representatives feel that speaking out against the Government could expose them to intimidation, retaliation or the misuse of public authority.

Guyana must guarantee that criticism of the President, ministers or public officials is treated as a legitimate part of democratic life, not as an act of disloyalty. The Government must ensure that state institutions are never used to intimidate critics or silence uncomfortable questions.

The country needs a clear commitment to protecting journalists, whistleblowers and citizens who expose wrongdoing. Public officials must answer criticism with facts, transparency and accountability not hostility or attempts to discredit those raising legitimate concerns.

2. The concentration and misuse of state power.

The rule of law requires meaningful checks and balances. No administration should be permitted to treat its electoral mandate as a licence to exercise power without adequate scrutiny.

Parliament must be allowed to perform its oversight responsibilities effectively. Opposition members must have a meaningful opportunity to scrutinise public expenditure, question ministers, examine government contracts and investigate allegations of wrongdoing.

The Government must also respect the independence of the judiciary and other constitutional bodies. Their credibility depends on their ability to discharge their duties without political pressure, interference or the perception that powerful interests receive preferential treatment.

3. Public procurement and accountability for public funds.

Guyana’s rapidly expanding oil revenues make transparency in public procurement more important than ever. Every contract awarded, every dollar spent and every project undertaken must withstand public scrutiny.

Persistent concerns about procurement practices, contract awards, project costs and the effectiveness of oversight mechanisms demonstrate why stronger safeguards are necessary. These concerns must be investigated through credible evidence and independent processes rather than dismissed as political rhetoric.

The National Assembly’s Public Accounts Committee and other oversight institutions must be adequately supported to scrutinise expenditure, examine audit findings and ensure that recommendations are acted upon. Delays in addressing audit concerns undermine public confidence and weaken accountability.

Government must strengthen transparent, accessible electronic procurement, publish contract awards and variations, disclose beneficial ownership where legally appropriate, and ensure that allegations of favouritism or corruption are investigated impartially.

4. Equal treatment before the law.

The rule of law means that the same standards must apply to ordinary citizens, government officials, political supporters and influential business interests.

Citizens must have confidence that complaints are investigated fairly, that prosecutions are not politically selective and that public officials are not shielded from accountability because of their positions or connections.

The Government must demonstrate, through its conduct and institutional reforms, that nobody is above the law and nobody should be placed below it because of their political views or lack of influence.

5. Access to justice and effective public institutions.

Justice delayed, inaccessible legal assistance and inadequate public confidence in law enforcement can weaken the practical protection that citizens receive under the law.

The Government should strengthen the capacity of the justice system, improve access to legal aid, reduce unnecessary delays, support appropriate alternative dispute resolution and ensure that complaints against law enforcement officers are investigated by credible, independent mechanisms.

The objective must be a justice system that works fairly and efficiently for ordinary Guyanese, not merely one that exists on paper.

WHAT GOVERNMENT MUST DO NOW?

I call on the Government to move beyond statements defending its record and undertake the following reforms:

1. Protect fundamental freedoms: Establish and enforce clear safeguards against the intimidation of journalists, whistleblowers, peaceful protesters and citizens who criticise public officials.

2. Strengthen parliamentary oversight: Respect the authority of parliamentary committees, facilitate access to information required for their work and ensure that audit and accountability recommendations receive timely attention.

3. Make procurement more transparent: Expand the publication of tender information, contract awards, variations and project implementation data, while strengthening independent scrutiny and enforcement against proven wrongdoing.

4. Protect institutional independence: Respect the constitutional independence of the judiciary and oversight bodies, and strengthen transparent appointment, reporting and accountability arrangements wherever necessary.

5. Improve police accountability: Ensure that allegations of misconduct are investigated impartially, that complaints mechanisms are accessible and that disciplinary or criminal consequences follow where wrongdoing is established.

6. Improve access to justice: Invest in court capacity, legal assistance, timely dispute resolution and public legal education so that rights are meaningful in practice.

7. Establish a national rule-of-law reform programme: Publish measurable targets, assign responsibility to the relevant institutions and report regularly to Parliament and the public on progress.

8. Engage constructively with independent assessments: Examine the WJP’s underlying indicators, identify the areas in which Guyana has deteriorated and develop a public action plan to address verified deficiencies.

GOVERNMENT MUST CHANGE COURSE!

The Government may question aspects of an international ranking’s methodology, and any legitimate methodological concerns should be examined carefully. However, disagreement with a report must never become an excuse to avoid the substantive issues it raises.

In October 2025, the Government publicly questioned aspects of the WJP’s assessment, arguing that some of the underlying surveys were drawn from earlier years. That argument makes it even more important for the Government to demonstrate measurable improvements through current, transparent and independently verifiable evidence.

The appropriate response to criticism is not simply to challenge the messenger. It is to examine the evidence, correct weaknesses and demonstrate that the country is moving in the right direction.

Guyana is blessed with enormous economic opportunities. But oil wealth alone cannot guarantee a just society, protect our democracy or secure the rights of future generations. Those outcomes require strong institutions, independent oversight, transparent government and respect for the freedoms of every citizen.

As APNU continues to advocate for good governance, accountability and transparency, we will insist that the Government be judged not merely by its promises or expenditure, but by the strength of our democratic institutions and the confidence that ordinary Guyanese can place in them.

The time has come for the Government to change course. Protect our freedoms, strengthen our institutions and restore public confidence in the rule of law. Guyana belongs to all of us, and its democratic safeguards must serve all of us equally.

Ganesh Mahipaul, M.P.

The PNCR mourns the passing of Everton Robert James, a long-standing member and father of APNU Member of Parliament, Hon...
21/10/2026

The PNCR mourns the passing of Everton Robert James, a long-standing member and father of APNU Member of Parliament, Hon. Nima Flue-Bess MP. The Leader and members of the PNCR extend sincere condolences to Cde. Flue-Bess and her family during this moment of bereavement. May his soul RIP. 🙏

21/10/2026

𝐓𝐔𝐍𝐄 𝐈𝐍 @ 𝟐:𝟎𝟎 𝐩𝐦 𝐓𝐇𝐈𝐒 𝐀𝐅𝐓𝐄𝐑𝐍𝐎𝐎𝐍...

PRESS STATEMENTJ.E. BURNHAM PRIMARY TO REMAIN OPEN: APNU WELCOMES VICTORY FOR THE SCHOOL COMMUNITYA Partnership for Nati...
20/10/2026

PRESS STATEMENT

J.E. BURNHAM PRIMARY TO REMAIN OPEN: APNU WELCOMES VICTORY FOR THE SCHOOL COMMUNITY

A Partnership for National Unity (APNU) welcomes Education Minister Sonia Parag’s public assurance that J.E. Burnham Primary School in Kitty will not be closed. We regard this assurance as a victory for the school community and for APNU’s advocacy in defence of its continued operation.

APNU took a clear public stand against the proposed closure. We demanded that the government suspend any closure decision and undertake genuine consultation with parents, teachers, students and the wider Kitty community. We highlighted the disruption and additional financial burdens that families could face after already purchasing uniforms, books and other supplies for the school year.

Our position was straightforward: children’s education and families’ livelihoods must carry real weight in decisions affecting their school. APNU placed these concerns on the public agenda and pressed for accountability. The minister’s subsequent assurance now gives the community a public commitment against which the government can be held accountable.

According to the report published by Kiskadee Watch on 19 October, Minister Parag stated, “There is no closure.” She also outlined proposals for a nursery facility and a separate block for secondary students, and indicated that consultations with parents were ongoing.

We welcome investment in educational facilities. The ministry must now explain clearly how these proposals will affect the continued operation of J.E. Burnham Primary School. Parents deserve certainty about where their children will learn, how construction will be managed and what measures will protect teaching time and student safety.

APNU therefore calls on the Ministry of Education to:

Provide written confirmation that J.E. Burnham Primary School will remain operational as a primary school.

Publish the proposed development plans, project costs and construction timetable.

Explain arrangements for pupils and teachers during any works.

Ensure meaningful consultation before decisions affecting the school are finalised.

Preserve the school’s name, identity and place in the Kitty community.

APNU acknowledges the concerns of parents and educators and welcomes the attention given to the school’s future. This outcome reinforces the importance of speaking up and demanding answers from those entrusted with public responsibility.

We claim this assurance as a win for the position APNU championed: J.E. Burnham Primary School must remain open, and its community must have a meaningful voice in its future.

APNU will continue to scrutinise the ministry’s plans and hold it to its public commitment.

END

20/10/2026

APNU Agriculture Month Series: Rice Development.

Address

Congress Place, Sophia
Georgetown

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when People's National Congress Reform posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The Organization

Send a message to People's National Congress Reform:

Shortcuts

Share