10/01/2026
HARRISTOWN, JOHN LA TOUCHE AND THE GREAT FAMINE
On 2 December 1846, (the 'Master') John La Touche published a letter to the UK Prime Minister, Lord John Russell, expressing dissatisfaction with certain relief measures that had been introduced for the labouring poor the preceding Summer. At his time of writing, La Touche was still relatively young, having been married in 1843, but had recently experienced considerable personal tragedy with the death of his father in1844 and the untimely death of his twin brother at the Curragh races in September of 1846, events which elevated him decisively to head of household. Besides having extensive holdings in Kildare, he also inherited interests in Tipperary and Leitrim, with total tenantry of about 1,000 and a substantial rent roll. Unlike his grandfather, father, uncles and granduncles, John did not himself seek influence through sitting in Parliament - his contribution as a political representative was limited to county roles such as the Grand Jury member, Justice of the Peace and Deputy Lieutenant. This would not be his first public letter addressed to the Prime Minister - he would later opine on the merits of secret ballot for parliamentary and local elections (eventually enacted in 1872), taking issue with the degree of landlord coercion and corruption that he had observed in voting practices.
By all accounts, La Touche was a responsible and caring landlord, famously imposing empathetic measures such as the simplest of meals on his own household during the famine. His letter to Russell took particular issue with the Public Works Act, whereby local landowners ultimately bore the financial burden of funding labour for the destitute in public works projects. La Touche, acknowledging that this measure was introduced before the full extent of potato failure was known, considered that relief committees were compelled to accept presentations for projects that were "utterly useless" and for which "no remuneration for the large sums expended on them" could be expected to be returned. La Touche argued the landlords in most baronies had done all in their power to relieve distress and were being forced to give money to unproductive labour and unprofitable and inequitable undertakings, and that it would be far better to deploy resources towards the draining and cultivation of waste land in the country. He went on to argue for publicly-funded assisted emigration, citing the success of his own private exploits - 'I have sent out every spring for the last 8 to 10 years many families to America, and without a single exception the accounts received from them are most satisfactory and encouraging'. My suspicion is that these assisted emigration cases related in the main to the Leitrim or Tipperary estates.
In Kildare, a September 1850 report in the Farmer's Gazette (a publication that was extremely well-disposed towards the La Touche estate) congratulates La Touche and his land steward Mr. Robertson on the successful putting of the former's money where his mouth was. The report made reference to the thorough draining (at a cost of £4 3s an acre) of the 130-acre townland of Stonebrook "composed principally of a bog and the site of an old lake". It goes on to state that "the results of this undertaking are highly satisfactory, but the effects during the course of operations, in giving employment during the late trying season of famine and destitution, and keeping the cottier tenantry of this truly humane proprietor off the rates".
However, another well-intentioned letter dated 19 November 1851 from La Touche to the editor of the Dublin Evening Mail highlighted the risks in putting one's head above the parapet - it drew criticism and accused La Touche of self-interest, abusing public officers administering the law under the most difficult of circumstances and of attempting to deter landed proprietors from improving property and employing people when this was most needed. The Board of Works to some extent had moved in a direction that was aligned with La Touche's 1846 letter to Russell and, assisted by Treasury loans as well as local rates, began focussing on drainage relief projects. La Touche's gripe, expressed in the 1851 letter, was not with this direction of travel but the lack of control that the landlords had in the projects and with mismanagement, inefficiency and the hapless ex*****on of the Board of Works. He cited being a victim of extortion, having been induced to put his name down for £500 in Leitrim and £100 in Tipperary with very poor results and at a cost of nearly £20 an acre, almost five times what La Touche had personally financed in Stonebrook and on land that "presented no difficulty to thorough drainage". I suspect that he had a point.