29/05/2026
长期出现不等于长期有作为
切勿偷换概念掩盖服务白卷
民进党全国青年团副秘书冯松洁表示，人联党都东区支部主席黄振渊近期发表批评与政治言论似乎在刻意刷存在感以及试图掩盖交白卷的事实。
“一个代议士是否称职，人民看的，从来不只是“是否长期住在当地”、“是否天天出现”或“是否容易找到”，而是真正为地方带来了什么改变，推动了什么成果，以及人民生活有没有获得实际改善。”
“因此，若有人今天不断强调自己‘长期在地’、‘长期出现’，甚至试图把这种‘长期存在感’包装成‘长期有作为’，人民自然也会进一步检视：过去曾经长期拥有影响力与代表权期间，究竟为都东带来了什么真正具体而长远的发展成果？”
这恰恰说明，“人在当地”不等于有执行力，更不等于有协调能力、资源整合能力以及真正解决问题的能力。政治从来不是“刷存在感”，更不是“待得久就有功”。人民衡量一个代议士，看得从来不是谁最常出现、谁最会上报、谁最会讲政治废话，而是问题有没有被解决，人民有没有真正受惠。
同样的，黄振渊如今不断拿“议员委派代表”、“没有亲自出席活动”等课题大做文章，但问题是：委派代表出席，什么时候开始等同于“没有做工”？没有亲自出席活动的同时，民间反映的问题有没有得到回应、关注及后续跟进，这才是真正的关键所在。
一个真正成熟且有效率的团队，本来就存在分工、协调与制度运作，重点是民生问题有没有被带进州议会、有没有被持续跟进、人民诉求有没有真正获得处理。否则，照黄振渊的逻辑，一个人是不是只要能够天天出现、天天讲废话、天天留在当地，但问题几十年始终解决不了，也能叫“合格的服务和有做工”？
事实上，本届代议士上任后已经积极推动多项地方基础设施与民生改善工作，包括关注水患、排水系统、道路衔接、公共设施提升及地方发展规划等课题，并持续与相关部门展开协调与跟进。其中，例如都东区许多长期被忽视的问题，如今已经逐步被带上议程，并开始进入执行与改善阶段。
更重要的是，人民也清楚看到，一些困扰诗巫多年的结构性问题，并不是短时间内形成的，因此也不可能在短短一个任期内瞬间全面解决。真正重要的，是有没有人愿意认真面对问题、持续推动解决方案，以及积极争取资源与政策协调。
相比起一味炒作“谁长期在当地”、“谁天天出现”，人民其实更在意的是：问题有没有开始获得解决，发展有没有真正开始推进，人民生活有没有逐步改善。因此，黄振渊今天若不断选择批评别人，就必须准备好面对人民最直接的检验：过去长期拥有影响力期间，究竟为都东带来了什么真正具改变性、能够被人民清楚感受到的发展成果？因为政治最终骗不了人民。有没有真正做事，人民心里最清楚。
𝐋𝐨𝐧𝐠-𝐓𝐞𝐫𝐦 𝐏𝐫𝐞𝐬𝐞𝐧𝐜𝐞 𝐃𝐨𝐞𝐬 𝐍𝐨𝐭 𝐄𝐪𝐮𝐚𝐥 𝐋𝐨𝐧𝐠-𝐓𝐞𝐫𝐦 𝐏𝐞𝐫𝐟𝐨𝐫𝐦𝐚𝐧𝐜𝐞
𝐒𝐭𝐨𝐩 𝐓𝐰𝐢𝐬𝐭𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐍𝐚𝐫𝐫𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐯𝐞 𝐭𝐨 𝐂𝐨𝐯𝐞𝐫 𝐚 𝐁𝐥𝐚𝐧𝐤 𝐒𝐞𝐫𝐯𝐢𝐜𝐞 𝐑𝐞𝐜𝐨𝐫𝐝
PDP National Youth Movement Assistant Secretary Eric Fung said recent remarks and political attacks by SUPP Dudong Branch Chairman Wong Ching Yong appear to be little more than an attempt to manufacture political relevance while deflecting attention from years of unremarkable performance and unresolved local issues.
He stressed that the people do not judge an elected representative merely based on how often they appear publicly, how long they have remained in a constituency, or how visible they are at events. What truly matters is whether they are capable of delivering tangible results, solving long-standing problems, and improving the daily lives of the people.
“Being constantly seen around town does not automatically translate into effectiveness, competence, or achievement. The rakyat are not interested in political theatrics or manufactured visibility. They are interested in outcomes,” he said.
Eric added that when certain individuals continuously emphasise being “long rooted locally” or “always present on the ground”, while attempting to portray such visibility as proof of service and achievement, the public will inevitably begin asking a far more important question - during the many years they previously held influence and representation, what actual transformative development did they bring to Dudong?
“Politics is not about who appears most frequently, who talks the loudest, or who dominates headlines. Politics is ultimately about whether problems are solved, whether development progresses, and whether the people genuinely benefit,” he said.
He further pointed out that Wong’s repeated criticisms regarding representatives attending functions on behalf of elected leaders, or attempts to politicise the absence of certain leaders from specific events, only reflect a shallow understanding of how effective governance and political administration actually function.
“Since when does delegating representatives equate to not working? A mature and effective political team operates through coordination, division of responsibilities, and institutional efficiency. The real issue is whether public complaints are responded to, whether follow-up actions are carried out, and whether the people’s concerns are ultimately resolved,” he said.
Eric added that based on Wong’s logic, a person who appears publicly every single day, continuously issues political statements, and remains physically present in the constituency, while long-standing issues remain unresolved for decades, could somehow still be considered an effective representative.
“That is precisely the kind of outdated political mentality the people are increasingly rejecting,” he said.
He stressed that since taking office, the current elected representative has actively pushed forward various infrastructure and people-centric improvement initiatives involving flood mitigation, drainage systems, road connectivity, public amenities, and broader local development planning, while maintaining continuous engagement and coordination with the relevant authorities.
“Many long-neglected issues affecting Dudong and the wider Sibu area are now finally being brought onto the agenda and gradually entering stages of implementation and improvement,” he said.
Eric also noted that many structural and developmental issues affecting Sibu today did not emerge overnight, nor can they realistically be resolved within a single term.
“What matters most is whether there is sincerity to confront these issues seriously, consistency in pushing for solutions, and the ability to secure coordination, resources, and policy support necessary to move development forward,” he added.
He said the people are far more concerned about whether roads improve, drainage issues are resolved, flood mitigation progresses, economic opportunities expand, and overall quality of life improves, rather than endless political narratives about who appears more frequently or who claims to have been around the longest.
“Therefore, if Wong Ching Yong wishes to continue criticising others, he must also be prepared to answer the people’s most direct question: during the years his side previously held influence and representation, what truly impactful and lasting development did they actually deliver for Dudong that the people can clearly see and feel today?” he said.
“Because at the end of the day, politics cannot deceive the people forever. Whether someone has genuinely served the rakyat is something the people themselves can judge very clearly.”
