10/12/2020
📢📢📢+++breaking - DAG votes against budget of the university, no majority for the budget in the council +++ 📢📢📢
We have voted against the budget of the university just now. Of 24 members of the council, 11 have given positive advice, 10 have given negative advice and 3 have voted "blanko". These votes are also counted, therefore the budget has been advised negatively! This is a major win for us, who have campaigned for this, and a major win for the council which has made its voice heard, and the academic community as a whole. Our reasons for voting against the budget:
The 10% rise in student numbers this academic year has not been accounted for in the budget. Furthermore, and even more worrying, the multiple year budget calculates with fixed student numbers, while at the same time the board of the university has been actively trying to increase the student numbers, such as by international marketing. DAG has submitted the degrowth memo that has problematized the uncontrolled growth of the university and its results, and suggested that we consciously degrow the university. It was promised that we would have a discussion about what size our university should have, which has not happened yet. In the meantime, we continue to grow without according for this in our budget.
This is a structural source of work pressure. As DAG has calculated, every day there were already 10.000 hours of unpaid overtime labor being done at our university in 2019. With the corona crisis work pressure has risen even more, as has been reported in the staff survey. With 10% more students, and not much more money freed up in the budget to hire more staff, this will become even worse this academic year. And when rising student numbers are not taken into account, it will rise every year.
Today we have taken a stand against the exploitation of our academic staff, and the according demise of the quality of our education. We demand the university to revise the budget and make a strong action plan to adress this. - --
Aditionally, we have asked the university to increase the budget of the confidential advisor, who now has to by herself handle harrassment complaints from the entire institution. We have demanded the university to increase funding for student psychologists.
Furthermore, the university council was not sufficiently informed about items that we were asked to vote upon. For example, we were asked to approve 750.000 euro for the "Dean of entrepreneurship", which we have never seen any evaluation of, even though we have been asking for it for months. Also, these items were never properly discussed in the council, but all put on the december council, making for a very full agenda. On top of this, (almost) none of the documents (except for one DAG memo on transparancy *the irony*, and a letter on diversity policy from the YAG) were available in English, making it extremely difficult for the international members of the council (including me). This behaviour of the Board of the University is undemocratic, intransparent, and unacceptable.
We hope the Board of the University of Groningen will take this issue seriously, and we are looking forward to the coming discussions! ✊✊✊🔥🔥🔥