12/11/2025
This week the ODT reported on Albany St both before and after yesterday's vote.
Here is the link to their prior article which focused on the increasing costs of the project as planned:
https://www.odt.co.nz/news/dunedin/albany-st-tenders-above-councils-budget
Here is a link to the report from the meeting after Councillors rejected consideration of the Leith Stream option and the potential savings it might have provided along with other benefits:
https://www.odt.co.nz/news/dunedin/dcc/controversial-albany-st-cycleway-survives-close-vote
The vote was:
Proceed with the full Albany Street Connection project.—
For (8): Mayor Sophie Barker and Crs John Chambers, Christine Garey, Doug Hall, Marie Laufiso, Mandy Mayhem, Mickey Treadwell, Steve Walker.
Against (7): Deputy mayor Cherry Lucas and Crs Russell Lund, Benedict Ong, Jules Radich, Andrew Simms, Lee Vandervis, Brent Weatherall.
This is what I said in the debate:
This forum has been typified by entrenched positions, inflammatory adjectives and oppositional attitudes.
This project fits that bill. It has been highly contentious and is now back in front of Council for the 3rd time in 4 months. There are differences this time though, because we have 6 new Councillors and a workable compromise that can provide a win-win result.
The question is: Are you capable of compromise?
The issues are: Accessibility, Pedestrian safety, Carparks and Cycle separation.
By using the Leith Stream route as a cycleway, everybody wins, most especially the students.
Albany St is primarily a pedestrian street and they deserve priority. They get safer crossings and no longer have to step off buses into live cyclelanes.
Cycles are hard to hear coming, they run into walkers and hurt them, that’s why they are banned from the inner campus. Leith Stream & Street are not inner campus and they take cyclists largely away from the Albany St pedestrians.
With Leith Stream, Cyclists get a pleasant, quiet, separated, scenic path to ride.
The second largest group, car drivers would get more carparks than ever – with 30 extra on side streets with a few less on Albany.
Accessibility to the library and all businesses is retained and mobility parks are installed as planned.
What’s not to like?
Half a decade to get the result right. Why has it taken so long? Because it is currently not right.
We heard a comment that it would be naïve to get parking & a cycleway – not at all, just build the cycleway beside the Leith.
Narrowing the road with a cycleway is ridiculous. We need cycleways that are used and we have heard that the Leith Stream route is a more attractive option for cyclists.
Are we prepared to listen to what people want? Only 10 cyclists celebrated the O’Malley decision.
Are we aspirational or do we just want what seems easiest?
The University architect Mr Roy agrees that the Leith Stream cycleway is a pleasant proposal. It is quite an upgrade from cyclists mixing it with car traffic on Albany St not to mention 8000 pedestrian students.
As Cr Garey said: “It’s about how we compromise and develop solutions that work for everybody.” How we start off sets the scene for how we go on. How about we start off with a compromise?
In terms of NZTA Benefit Cost Ratios, Fully separated cycleways are safer.
We don’t know about NZTA funding for the Leith Stream option but we owe to ourselves and the great number of Albany St users to find out. There is nothing to say that we will not get funding.
My alternate motion was to:
a) Proceed with the main pedestrian crossings and resurfacing of Albany St while looking at value engineering & capital savings.
b) Assess the feasibility of a Leith Stream cycleway and retain NZTA funding
c) Report back to Council on progress.
It wasn't considered because the motion to proceed with the Albany St project passed.