10/06/2026
Ruapehu District Council’s Risk and Assurance Committee has unanimously voted to receive the final investigative reports into the $700,000 overspend in the Community and Recreational Facilities activity area.
The reports include the Review of Findings Report, the Improvements Programme Roadmap, and the Independent Chair’s Report on the Overspend.
The final reports follow the preliminary investigation report endorsed by the Committee in July last year, which examined the overspend transactions, the corrective actions taken, and recommendations to strengthen Council’s budget management and contracts oversight.
Mayor Weston Kirton said Council acted quickly once the overspend was identified to investigate what had occurred and put corrective measures in place.
“Ratepayers should take confidence from the way Council managed this issue including that there was independent oversight of the response,” he said.
“Council staff also deserve recognition for identifying internal savings that enabled the overspend to be offset with no additional debt required from ratepayers.
Strong new oversight and financial controls are now in place to support better decision-making and reduce the likelihood of anything similar happening again.
The improved systems and enhanced cashflow modelling have contributed to Council not needing to take on any new debt over the past 12 months.”
Independent Chairperson Philip Jones said that while he would have liked to have seen quicker progress, he was satisfied the time taken was needed to ensure the process was thorough, fair, and objective.
“The investigation needed to fully examine what happened, why decisions were made, and what changes were required to prevent future incidents,” said Mr Jones.
“The extended absence of key staff meant the second stage of the investigation - including examining the role of staff and suppliers, the rationale for key decisions, and any further actions required - was always likely to take time.”
Mr Jones added that he was satisfied that the level of independent oversight provided through his role and the Risk and Assurance Committee was appropriate.
“Engaging external consultants to peer review Council’s response could have cost between $50,000 to $150,000, which was not considered justified.
While the formal investigation had now concluded, Council’s work to implement the Improvements Programme Roadmap, and support ongoing organisational and cultural change, would continue under the monitoring of the Risk and Assurance Committee,” he said.
*END*
, , ,
