25/02/2026
Discussion about whether Chris Hipkins should resign as leader of the New Zealand Labour Party reflects differing views on leadership effectiveness, electoral performance, and the role of party strategy in rebuilding after defeat. Hipkins became party leader in early 2023 and quickly moved into the prime ministerial role following Jacinda Ardern’s resignation, but led the party to a loss at the 2023 general election when National formed government under Christopher Luxon. After that defeat, his leadership was reaffirmed by Labour’s caucus, which opted to retain him in the role rather than pursue a change soon after the election.
Public opinion polls and surveys offer mixed signals. At points since the election, some polls have shown fluctuations in Hipkins’s personal approval and preferred prime minister ratings, with occasional low numbers in head-to-head comparisons with other leaders. That has fuelled commentary about whether the party might benefit from a different figure at the helm. However, other polling showed a majority of respondents saying Hipkins should continue as leader of Labour, and within the party caucus there has been expressed support for him continuing in the role as the team seeks to rebuild after its loss at the ballot box.
Opinions about leadership change also hinge on broader strategy. Some argue fresh leadership could reframe Labour’s message and appeal as opposition, while others suggest stability helps the party consolidate its policies and prepare for future elections. Party constitutions and internal dynamics mean leadership changes are decided primarily by caucus confidence and internal processes, rather than external pressure alone. Debates about resignation are therefore shaped by political goals, public sentiment, and how different Labour members view the best path to reconnect with voters rather than a simple yes or no answer.
