11/03/2026
Full Statement by the CLRC Chairman Delivered in Parliament – 10 March 2026.
Second Reading of the Report on the Review of the Form and System of Government.
Yesterday, the Chairman of the Constitutional and Law Reform Commission (CLRC), Hon. Saki Soloma, MP, delivered a statement in Parliament regarding the Report on Constitutional Directive No. 4 - Review of the Form and System of Government - The Election of the Prime Minister by the People.
Statement:
Mr Speaker,
I rise to contribute to the debate on the Report on the Review of the Form and System of Government, which is now before this Honourable House for its Second Reading.
First, I wish to thank the Prime Minister Hon. James Marape for his leadership and for the support behind the critical review that had led to the report now before this house.
It was an honor and a privilege for me as the Chairman of CLRC to have led the major review on the form and system of the government.
I wish to thank the Government for having the courage and vision to initiate this national review. Reforming the way our country is governed is not an easy task. It requires political will, patience, and a genuine concern for the future of our nation.
Mr Speaker, I stand today to register my support for this report, particularly the recommendations, and why I feel it is the right thing to do.
I strongly feel that the seven terms of reference captured in the report together with their corresponding recommendations on:
Levels of Government; The role of Head of State; Election of the Prime Minister; Electoral Roll Process; Women Representation;
Political Party System; and Parliamentary system are very relevant and pertinent to big questions on the effectiveness of the form and system of our government. Addressing these terms of references have the same rippling effects on addressing the corresponding detailed issues.
This Report was ultimately shaped by the voices of many Papua New Guineans across our country from governors, MPs, provincial administrators, and local-level government leaders to women leaders, church leaders, youth groups and ordinary citizens who share their concerns and grievances with us.
Many people spoke openly about the challenges they see in the way government currently operates. Some were frustrated, some were hopeful, and some simply asked whether the system we inherited at Independence still fits the reality of Papua New Guinea today.
Mr Speaker,
One important message coming out clearly from these report: people want government to work better for them.
People are not interested in complicated structures or political arguments. What they want is simple — they want schools that function, health services that reach their villages, roads that connect their communities, and leaders who can make decisions and carry them through. Basically, they want services to reach them and for them to fully benefit from those services as it is supposed to be.
In many places we visited, people told us that government systems are sometimes too confusing. They said responsibilities are not always clear. One level of government blames another level. Funding delays happen. Projects stop halfway.
These are not new concerns. Honourable Members will know this very well from their own districts.
For example, one of the common concerns people often ask is: “Who is responsible for fixing this road?” or “Which level of government should support this health centre?”
Sometimes even our own local leaders struggle to explain the answer.
Because of this, the Commission looked closely at the structure of our current three-tier system of government. In theory, the system was designed to bring government closer to the people. Even though the system sounded and seemed decentralized, it was more centralized. It has also created overlapping responsibilities and administrative complexity.
For instance, a road project may involve national funding, provincial coordination, and local-level implementation. When one part of that chain breaks down, the whole project is delayed.
The recommendation to simplify the structure of government into a two-tier system with provincial member comprising elected LLG representatives and nominated members is therefore not about removing decentralisation. It is about making decentralisation work better. And with that comes, decentralization of powers and functions.
If responsibilities are clearly defined and fewer layers are involved, decisions can be made faster, funds can move more efficiently, and communities can see results more quickly.
Mr Speaker,
We have also seen during consultations that many Papua New Guineans value stability in leadership.
Development plans take time. Roads, hospitals, schools and economic projects cannot be completed overnight. They require steady leadership and continuity in government policy.
However, our political history has shown that frequent changes in leadership can interrupt development planning. When governments change often, priorities can change as well. Long-term projects sometimes stall while new policies are introduced.
The Commission therefore carefully examined how our political system can promote greater stability while still respecting democratic principles.
The recommendation relating to how the Prime Minister is selected is intended to give voters clearer choices during elections and provide governments with a stronger and more stable mandate to govern for a full term.
When the people clearly understand which party and leadership team they are voting for, the outcome of elections becomes more decisive. Governments can then focus on delivering policies rather than constantly defending their position.
Mr Speaker,
In relation to the role of the Head of State, many citizens expressed pride in Papua New Guinea’s journey as an independent nation. Having reached 50 years of Independence, it is timely to consider whether our Head of State arrangements should evolve to reflect our national maturity and identity.
The recommendation to move toward a non-executive President is intended to maintain the same neutral and constitutional role while allowing Papua New Guinea to symbolically express its sovereignty through a national Head of State.
The President, like the current system, would remain above politics and would continue to safeguard constitutional processes.
Mr Speaker,
The Commission also considered the law-making process in Parliament.
Today, legislation passed by this House can have wide and long-lasting effects on the lives of millions of citizens. Yet in many cases laws must be debated and passed within tight timeframes due to the demands of the parliamentary calendar.
The proposal for a bicameral parliament introduces the idea of a second chamber that can review legislation before it becomes law.
Such a chamber could represent provincial interests and provide an additional level of scrutiny. It would not replace this House, but rather strengthen the overall legislative process by ensuring that laws are carefully examined before implementation.
Many democratic countries use this system to improve the quality of legislation and strengthen checks and balances.
Mr Speaker,
I also welcome the recommendation relating to women’s representation in Parliament.
Throughout the country, women contribute enormously to community development. In many villages, women manage markets, organise health awareness programs, lead church activities and ensure that children attend schools.
Despite these contributions, their presence in national decision-making remains very limited.
The Commission therefore recommended several possible mechanisms such as reserved seats, nominated positions or quota arrangements.
These measures are designed to encourage greater participation until representation becomes more balanced through normal electoral processes.
Many countries have successfully used similar approaches to strengthen inclusive leadership.
Mr Speaker,
The Report also addresses issues within the electoral system itself.
In recent elections, we have seen challenges related to candidate nominations, lengthy court disputes, and delays in confirming results.
These issues can create uncertainty and sometimes lead to tension in communities.
The Commission therefore recommends clearer candidate qualification requirements, improved nomination procedures and faster mechanisms for resolving election disputes.
The goal is simple — elections must produce outcomes that are accepted as fair, transparent and legitimate.
Mr Speaker,
Another key area examined in the Report is the strength of political parties.
Political parties play an essential role in organising ideas and presenting policy alternatives to the public. But when party systems are weak, politics can become unpredictable, and governments may struggle to maintain consistent policy direction.
The Commission therefore recommends measures that encourage stronger party discipline, clearer policy platforms and better enforcement of party laws, as captured in the report.
When parties are stable and policy-driven, voters can make more informed choices and governments can operate more effectively.
Mr Speaker,
Allow me also to acknowledge the support we received from the Government during this review process.
The Government recognised that after nearly fifty years of Independence, it is both responsible and necessary to examine whether our constitutional arrangements are still serving the nation as effectively as they should.
This review is not about rejecting the vision of our founding fathers. On the contrary, it builds upon the strong foundation they created.
Like any system, our form and system of government must evolve over time as circumstances change and as our country grows.
I therefore wish to sincerely thank the Prime Minister and his Government for giving the Commission the mandate and the support needed to carry out this important national task.
Mr Speaker,
The Report before Parliament is the result of careful study, public consultation, and comparative research. We examined how other democratic nations manage similar challenges. We studied both the successes and the lessons learned from other systems.
But in the end, the recommendations in this Report are shaped primarily by the realities of Papua New Guinea.
Mr Speaker,
The reforms proposed in this Report are not simply about present political arrangements. They are about creating a stronger and more effective system of governance for the future of Papua New Guinea.
Mr Speaker,
As this debate continues in this Honourable House, I also encourage all Members to engage with the recommendations thoughtfully and responsibly.
And let us work together to strengthen the system of government that will guide Papua New Guinea into the years ahead.
I thank you.
___________________
Hon. Saki Soloma, MP
Chairman, CLRC
Date: 10/03/2026
Ends//
Insert: CLRC Chairman Hon. Saki Soloma, MP, delivering his statement during yesterday's Parliament Sitting.