09/20/2024
Results and event For Immediate Release: Sept. 19, 2024 Contact: Mason Graham, Common Cause, 505-417-4012 or [email protected] Perry Radford, NM Open Primaries, 323-243-8111 or perry@radphil
An organization dedicated to the creation of an Independent Redistricting Commission in New Mexico.
(2)
6739 Academy Road NE, Suite 124
Albuquerque, NM
87109
Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Fair Districts for New Mexico posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.
The U.S. Supreme Court has declined to rule on two cases related to state redistricting plans. They said that it was up to the states to deal with that issue. Therefore, the League of Women Voters now calls upon New Mexico policymakers to engage with the “good government” groups and the general public to develop a fair and transparent process for redistricting in 2021.
New Mexico has joined the vast number of states that have a state ethics commission, a great victory for transparency and accountability in government. Now it is time for New Mexico to take the next step and join the growing number of states that have created objective, fair and transparent systems for redistricting so that constituents choose their representatives rather than having their representatives choose their constituents. Redistricting takes place in the year following the decennial census and determines the congressional and state legislative districts. Fourteen states already have independent legislative redistricting commissions. At least six other states are considering adopting some type of redistricting reform prior to 2021. In New Mexico, the legislature determines the congressional and state legislative districts as well as the Public Education Commission and Public Regulation Commission districts.
New Mexico has a long history of having its redistricting maps litigated and decided by the courts. From 1960 until 1991 New Mexico was forced to get pre-clearance by the US Department of Justice to assure that the maps approved by the legislature and the governor complied with federal standards for fair representation. In 1995, the DOJ once again required pre-clearance after the 1992 amended maps violated the standards.
After the 2000 Census data was received and concept maps were produced by Research and Polling, the Legislative Redistricting Committee held extensive hearings across the state, getting input from the public, organizations, and tribal governments. The redistricting budget was $1.8 million. The maps the legislature approved and the governor signed were challenged by several parties. The state had to pay an additional $1.7 million in litigation costs, and the courts again drew the lines.