08/01/2024
This morning the Select Board unanimously voted to forward two MBTA Communities Act maps, as approved by the Planning Board on July 30, to the EOHLC for pre-compliance review
https://www.belmont-ma.gov/planning-board/pages/mbta-communities-zoning-project
The final maps are in excellent shape, reflecting countless hours of work by the MBTA Advisory Committee, the Planning Board, and Select Board Member Roy Epstein. I thank them for their exemplary service.
The maps are identical, with the exception of inclusion of the Purecoat North site (39 Hittinger St) and F.E. French Construction (40 Brighton St) in Map 2. I have grave concerns about the inclusion of Purecoat, related to environmental remediation, increased traffic, addressing our identified housing gaps (specifically housing for young professionals and seniors), and inclusion of sufficient commercial space. I believe that my Select Board colleagues share many of these concerns. However, we also believe in an open and comprehensive public process, hence we voted to forward both maps for review.
Inclusion in an MBTA Communities map allows developers to build as-of-right, limited only by state statute. Including the Purecoat site in the MBTA Communities map substantially reduces Belmont's ability to guide the development of the site. Belmont must maintain zoning control over this property, because the current proposal (which is both amorphous and evolving) falls short in several ways.
Specifically, it:
1. Does not adequately address the contamination issues on site: The Purecoat site is badly contaminated from metal finishing processes, and the development process must not spread contamination to surrounding parts of the community. (The site is a half-mile from the new Middle and High School.) On the one hand, we need to contain contamination during construction. On the other hand, capping contamination by leaving the current cement slab in place leaves dangerous chemicals on-site. Regardless, Belmont needs to retain zoning control to work out an acceptable environmental clean-up agreement.
2. Provides too much parking, without traffic mitigation: Belmont's efforts to create a livable, walkable community will be undercut by the 200 parking spaces (both underground and surface) included in the current development proposal. Such parking may be necessary to make a residential development financially viable. However, that must be offset by negotiating with the developer to implement traffic mitigation efforts to help Belmont become a more diverse, walkable, and livable community.
3. Does not address our current housing gaps: Belmont is working with real estate consultants RKG Associates to identify our housing market needs and commercial development opportunities. You can find their preliminary analysis here: https://www.belmont-ma.gov/sites/g/files/vyhlif12826/f/uploads/belmont_market_analysis_presentation_deck_6-14-24.pdf. Right now, our biggest housing gap is affordable studio and one-bedroom apartments, which provide entry points for young professionals and seniors wishing to downsize. The vast majority of the proposed 225 units at Purecoat are for two-plus bedroom units. These are more profitable for the developer, but they do not diversify either our housing options or our current demographic distribution.
4. Does not maximize the opportunity for new commercial taxes: By retaining current commercial zoning and keeping the site out of the MBTA Communities map, Belmont can require more commercial space, while maintaining the residential component of the project that is financially attractive to the developer (and which will increase foot traffic to our shopping areas). In addition to the residential component (which I support), I have specifically requested a second floor of commercial space (preferably for medical services), but the developer has not yet agreed.
As Select Board Chair, my overarching goals are to ensure a vibrant community and a financially sustainable future for Belmont. Belmont recently avoided drastic cuts to school and town services by passing an $8.4 million tax override. As a champion for that override, I promised to support reasonable steps to increase our commercial tax base, in order to 1) increase the number of years the town can go without seeking another override, and 2) reduce the size of the next override request.
Increasing our commercial tax base is essential for Belmont’s long-term financial stability. Currently, less than 5% of Belmont property taxes come from commercial sources. Including the site in the compliance map means that Belmont will lose a one-time opportunity to maximize commercial revenue. Select Board Vice Chair Matt Taylor and I have both pledged to work toward a 10% threshold of commercial property tax revenue. Converting one of our largest parcels from commercial to residential zoning runs directly contrary to this promise to Belmont’s taxpayers.
5. Forces us to rezone F.E. French Construction from commercial to residential: Due to the technical requirements of the MBTA Communities Act, Purecoat can’t stand alone as a residential site. As a result, the MBTA Communities map must also rezone F.E. French Construction (40 Brighton St) to meet a five-acre threshold. This means that Belmont would rezone even more of its already limited commercial zoning to residential (with no commercial component). Given the Town’s pressing need for commercial development, this takes us in the wrong direction!
My opposition to inclusion of the Purecoat site has been mischaracterized as opposition to affordable housing as a whole. On the contrary, I have repeatedly and publicly stated that two of my top priorities are the redevelopment and significant expansion of both Sherman Gardens and Belmont Village. Increased unit count is why I strongly advocated the inclusion of all Belmont Housing Authority properties in Belmont’s MBTA Communities Map.
As long-time Chair of the Community Preservation Committee (CPC), I championed efforts to provide over $1MM in development funding that will allow Belmont to leverage tens of millions of dollars in state and federal grants to redevelop Sherman Gardens. This redevelopment is well underway and will increase the current unit count from 80 to approximately 125 units (including additional family units). The CPC has also funded preliminary plans for Belmont Village, which we hope will result in a similar 50% increase in the unit count there.
I strongly supported the McLean Zone 3 development, which will result in a substantial increase in affordable housing units in Belmont. This happened only because Belmont had the right to negotiate a favorable deal with the Zone 3 developer.
Given our need for commercial development and environmental remediation, Belmont must be thoughtful in our approach to developing the Purecoat site. We have a once-in-a-generation opportunity to get this development right. For these reasons, I strongly advocate excluding it from the MBTA Communities Act map that Town Meeting will ultimately adopt.
This page provides up-to-date information and resources in regard to the MBTA Communities Multifamily Zoning Project.