https://www.facebook.com/share/1F37KgwRcn/

Law Views, Boston, MA (2026)

08/10/2026

WHEN “BAIL IS AT THE DISCRETION OF THE COURT” BECOMES A NEVER-ENDING ADJOURNMENT 😄⚖️

“Bail is at the discretion of the Court.”

In simple terms, this means that the Court has the authority to grant or refuse bail, subject to the applicable law and principles guiding the exercise of judicial discretion.

There are numerous legal authorities establishing that such discretion must be exercised judiciously and judicially. However, sometimes, the practical experience of litigants and counsel can be quite different. 😄

Some years ago, I applied for the bail of an accused person before the High Court and duly served the Office of the Attorney-General of the State, hereinafter referred to as the Respondent.

On the first date fixed for the matter, the Respondent was absent.

Court: “I have seen the proof of service on the Respondent. This matter is adjourned to the … day of … for hearing.”

On the next hearing date, I appeared in court. Again, the Respondent was absent.

Court: “The Respondent is not in court today. I hereby order that a Hearing Notice be issued and served on the Respondent. The matter is adjourned to the … day of … for hearing.”

On the next date, I was present once again. The Respondent was, once again, absent.

Me: “My Lord, on the last date, the Court ordered that a Hearing Notice be issued and served on the Respondent. My Lord, the Respondent was duly served, and the acknowledgment copy is in the Court’s file.”

Court: “I have seen the endorsement and return copy of the Hearing Notice served on the Respondent. I have also noted that the Respondent is not in court. This matter is adjourned for the last time…”

On the next date, I appeared again.

The Respondent? Absent.

Me: “My Lord, the Respondent is not in court today and has also not filed any Counter-Affidavit in opposition to our application. In the circumstances, My Lord, we humbly apply to move our motion.”

Court: “I have noted that the Respondent is not in court today. I will adjourn this matter for the very, very last time.”

Fast-forward to the next date.

I repeated my submission. The Respondent was still absent.

Court: “I have again noted that the Respondent is absent. I will adjourn this matter for the very, very, very last time.”

And, sadly, the matter was adjourned again—for the very, very, very, very last time. 😂

At that point, I decided that perhaps I had spent enough time visiting that particular courtroom. So, I made the difficult decision not to return to that court again. 😄

But here is the serious question behind the humour:

When a bail application is repeatedly adjourned despite proper service, the absence of the Respondent, and no opposition being filed, does that effectively amount to another form of refusing bail—albeit indirectly?

Of course, every case turns on its own facts, and judicial discretion must be exercised according to law. But experiences like this raise important questions about access to justice, judicial efficiency, timely determination of applications, and the practical meaning of the right to bail.

What is your take on this experience?
Have you ever encountered a situation where repeated adjournments felt like a decision in themselves? ⚖️😊

Law Views 👈

08/10/2026

DOES BEING BORN OUTSIDE MARRIAGE TAKE AWAY A CHILD’S LEGAL RIGHTS?

The answer is NO.

A child does not lose their fundamental legal rights simply because they were born outside marriage. The circumstances of a child’s birth should never be used as a basis for discrimination or denial of lawful rights.

⚖️ WHAT DOES NIGERIAN LAW SAY?

Section 42(2) of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999 (as amended) provides that no Nigerian citizen shall be subjected to any disability or deprivation merely because of the circumstances of their birth.

This means that a child cannot lawfully be discriminated against simply because their parents were not married when the child was born.

👨‍👩‍👧 HOW CAN PATERNITY OR LEGITIMACY BE ESTABLISHED?

Depending on the circumstances, the legal relationship between a child and father may be established through:

1. Acknowledgment by the Father
Where a father acknowledges a child as his own, this may establish the relevant legal relationship and rights.

2. Subsequent Marriage of the Parents
Under applicable Nigerian law, the marriage of the parents after the child’s birth may have legal consequences concerning the child’s status.

3. Court Declaration of Paternity
Where paternity is disputed, a court may determine the issue based on admissible evidence, which may include DNA testing where appropriate.

⚖️ WHY DOES THIS MATTER?

A child’s legal rights may include rights relating to:

✔️ Inheritance and succession
✔️ Maintenance and financial support
✔️ Parental care and protection
✔️ Identity and family relationships
✔️ Equal protection under the law

Most importantly, a child should not be punished for circumstances beyond their control.

A father’s refusal to acknowledge a child does not make the child “illegal.” Where paternity is disputed, the matter can be addressed through lawful procedures and, where necessary, judicial determination.

📌 THE BOTTOM LINE

Children should not bear the consequences of the choices or circumstances of adults.

Every child deserves dignity, identity, protection, care, and equal treatment under the law.

Legal rights can depend on the specific facts of a case, so anyone dealing with a paternity, inheritance, maintenance, or legitimacy dispute should seek advice from a qualified Nigerian legal practitioner.

Know the law. Protect the child. Defend equality.

Law Views 👈

08/09/2026

⚖️ CAN A FATHER GET CUSTODY OF HIS CHILD AFTER REMARRYING?

Yes. Remarrying does not automatically prevent a father from seeking custody of his child.

In child-custody matters, courts generally focus on the best interests, safety, welfare, and overall well-being of the child rather than simply whether a parent is single, married, or has remarried.

A father may be considered for custody where, depending on the circumstances:

• The mother is unable or unwilling to provide appropriate care.
• The child is experiencing neglect, abuse, or an unsafe living environment.
• The father can provide a stable, secure, and suitable home.
• The child’s physical, emotional, educational, or developmental needs would be better protected in the father’s care.
• Other relevant circumstances demonstrate that living with the father would be in the child’s best interests.

⚖️ REMARRIAGE ALONE IS NOT A REASON TO DENY CUSTODY

A father’s decision to remarry does not, by itself, make him unsuitable to have custody of his child. The court will consider the specific facts and circumstances of the case, including the child’s age, health, education, emotional needs, living arrangements, safety, and the ability of each parent to provide proper care and support.

However, a father should not take the child from the mother without lawful authority simply because he has remarried or believes he can provide a better home. Where custody is contested, the appropriate course is to seek the necessary orders from a competent court.

Ultimately, custody proceedings are not about rewarding one parent or punishing the other. The central question is:

What arrangement best protects the child’s welfare and best interests?

📌 Legal Disclaimer: Child-custody laws and procedures vary from country to country and can depend heavily on the facts of each case. This post is for general legal information and should not be treated as a substitute for advice from a qualified lawyer in your jurisdiction.

⚖️ Know the law. Protect the child. Respect the court process.

Law Views 👈

08/08/2026

⚖️ A JUDGE MUST NOT DESCEND INTO THE ARENA OF THE CASE

A judge is not a prosecutor.
A judge is not a defence counsel.
A judge is not counsel for the claimant.
A judge is not counsel for the defendant.

A judge is an impartial arbiter of the dispute.

The fundamental duty of a judge is to hear both sides fairly, consider the evidence properly placed before the court, apply the law, and reach a decision without fear, favour, affection, prejudice, or ill will.

Judicial intervention is sometimes necessary. A judge may ask questions, seek clarification, ensure procedural fairness, and maintain control over court proceedings.

However, there is an important boundary between judicial intervention and judicial participation.

A judge must be careful not to descend into the arena by personally investigating the case, supplying evidence for one party, advancing arguments that counsel has not made, or conducting proceedings in a manner that creates the impression that the court is trying to prove one side's case.

⚖️ The courtroom is an arena of contest between the parties—not between a party and the judge.

Justice depends upon an impartial and independent decision-maker. The judge's role is to hear the case, evaluate the evidence, apply the law, and decide the dispute—not to become a participant in it.

An impartial judiciary is fundamental to the rule of law and public confidence in justice.

You have been informed. ⚖️
Follow Law Views for more legal education, insights and updates.

Law Views 👈

08/08/2026

🏡 6 LEGAL MISTAKES TO AVOID WHEN BUYING LAND THROUGH AN AGENT

Buying land through a real estate agent is common in many countries, including Nigeria. While many agents are legitimate professionals, never assume that someone marketing a property automatically has the legal authority to sell it.

Before you commit your hard-earned money, avoid these six costly mistakes:

❌ 1. Assuming the agent has authority to sell
The fact that an agent shows you a property or negotiates the price does not automatically mean the owner has authorised them to complete the sale. Always verify the agent’s authority.

❌ 2. Failing to confirm the true owner
Before making any payment, establish who legally owns the property. Check the relevant title documents and ensure the details match the person claiming ownership.

❌ 3. Not verifying the agent’s authority
Ask for documentary evidence showing that the agent is authorised to act for the owner. Depending on the circumstances, this may include a Power of Attorney, written authority, or other legally recognised documentation.

❌ 4. Paying into an agent’s personal account
Do not transfer the purchase price to an agent’s personal account unless you have confirmed that the owner has expressly authorised the agent to receive the money on their behalf.

❌ 5. Skipping proper due diligence
Never rely solely on a recommendation from a friend, relative or colleague. Conduct the necessary property searches, verify title documents, inspect the survey or property plan, and consult a qualified property lawyer before completing the transaction.

❌ 6. Signing documents you do not understand
Receipts, agreements, contracts and deeds can create serious legal rights and obligations. Never sign a property document simply because you are told it is “just paperwork.” Make sure you understand what you are signing and seek independent legal advice where necessary.

🔑 REMEMBER:
The safest property transactions are not necessarily the fastest ones. They are the ones completed with proper verification, documentation and legal due diligence.

Before paying for land through an agent, ask:

👉 “Does this person have the legal authority to bind the owner in this transaction?”

That simple question could save you from losing both your money and the property.

🌍 Protect your investment. Verify before you pay. Seek professional legal advice.

Have you ever bought or considered buying property through an agent? What steps did you take to verify the seller and the agent’s authority?

⚖️ This post is for general legal education and does not replace advice from a qualified lawyer in your jurisdiction.

Law Views 👈

08/08/2026

🚨 ARIZONA INVESTIGATION: TWO BODIES FOUND BURIED IN BACKYARD AS SON FLEES COUNTRY

A disturbing investigation is unfolding in Litchfield Park, Arizona, after police discovered two sets of human remains buried in the backyard of a family home during a welfare check.

On Tuesday, August 4, 2026, police were contacted by a family member who became concerned after being unable to reach the husband, wife, and their 27-year-old son, Matthew Flores.

When officers entered the residence, they reportedly discovered a significant amount of blood and evidence suggesting an attempt had been made to clean or conceal it.

Investigators subsequently searched the property, and on Thursday, excavation work in the backyard led to the discovery of two sets of human remains.

According to police, the remains have not yet been officially identified. However, investigators believe they may be connected to the people who lived at the residence.

Adding another disturbing element to the case, a swimming pool had reportedly been installed in the backyard only about a month before the discovery.

Police say Matthew Flores had already left the United States before the welfare check was requested. Authorities believe he fled the country and are now conducting an international search for him.

At this stage, authorities have not confirmed the identities of the deceased, cause of death, or motive. The names of the parents have also not been released at the family's request.

The investigation remains ongoing, and authorities are working to determine exactly what happened inside the home.

⚠️ Important: The allegations described above remain part of an active investigation. Matthew Flores has not been convicted of any crime, and the circumstances surrounding the deaths have not yet been fully established.

What do you think investigators will uncover as this case develops?

Law Views 👈

08/07/2026

⚖️ The Mistake That Can Weaken a Court Case Before It Even Begins

One of the most common mistakes people make is waiting until a dispute arises before they start looking for evidence.

When everything is going well, they may fail to keep receipts, preserve important messages, sign written agreements, or properly document transactions. Instead, they rely on trust, verbal promises, and assumptions.

Then the relationship breaks down—and suddenly, they need evidence that was never properly preserved.

The reality is simple: a strong legal case is often built long before anyone enters a courtroom.

📌 Keep important records.
📌 Put agreements in writing.
📌 Preserve relevant messages and documents.
📌 Keep receipts and proof of payment.
📌 Never assume you will never need the evidence.

Once a dispute reaches court, it may be difficult—or even impossible—to recreate evidence that was lost or never documented in the first place.

Pepper Soup Wisdom: The strongest cases are often prepared long before a lawsuit is ever filed.

Protect your interests today. Document what matters. Trust is valuable, but proper documentation provides protection.

08/07/2026

Never Buy Property Without Verifying Ownership First

One of the costliest mistakes in real estate is purchasing land or a home based solely on trust.

A friendly seller or convincing story is not proof of legal ownership.

Before making any payment, ask one critical question:

"Does this person have the legal authority to sell this property?"

Every year, many buyers lose significant amounts of money after purchasing property from individuals who were not the rightful owners or lacked the legal authority to complete the sale.

Before you invest, make sure you verify:

✅ Is the seller the registered legal owner?

✅ If the property is jointly or family owned, have all required owners or authorized representatives given their consent?

✅ Are the title deeds and ownership documents authentic and legally valid?

✅ Is the property free from legal disputes, liens, encumbrances, or government acquisition?

These checks should always be completed before any money changes hands—not after.

Proper due diligence is one of the best investments you can make. Taking the time to verify ownership and legal status today can save you from years of legal battles, financial loss, and unnecessary stress in the future.

Remember: Never let excitement or pressure rush your decision. A few days of careful verification can protect your investment for a lifetime.

Law Views 👈

08/06/2026

Many people believe their family will automatically take care of everything if something happens to them. Unfortunately, that's not always the case.

Without a properly funded living trust, your estate may have to go through probate—a legal process where the court oversees how your assets are managed and distributed. This can lead to lengthy delays, legal fees, court costs, and a public process that may place important decisions in the hands of the court rather than the people you trust.

After a lifetime of making thoughtful decisions, your legacy deserves to remain under your direction.

A properly funded living trust gives you greater control over your estate. It allows you to choose who will manage your assets, how they will be distributed, and how your wishes will be carried out—while helping your loved ones avoid unnecessary probate.

Your family should be guided by your decisions, not the court's.

Download our FREE Essential Guide to Estate Planning through the link on our page and discover how a living trust can help protect your loved ones, preserve your legacy, and provide peace of mind for the future.

Your legacy. Your way.

Law Views 👈

08/05/2026

Some courtroom moments transcend legal arguments, revealing the raw emotions, humanity, and life-changing realities behind every case. From heartfelt testimonies to powerful reunions and long-awaited justice, these emotional courtroom scenes remind us that the law is not only about rules—it is also about people, truth, and hope.

What is the most emotional courtroom moment you have ever witnessed or heard about? Share your thoughts in the comments.

Law Views 👈

Law Views

08/10/2026

08/10/2026

08/09/2026

08/08/2026

08/08/2026

08/08/2026

08/07/2026

08/07/2026

08/06/2026

08/05/2026

Address

Telephone

Website

Alerts

Contact The Organization

Shortcuts

Share

Category