Missourians for Ethical & Transparent Government

Directions Website

Missourians for Ethical & Transparent Government Open and Honest Government
“Content on this page reflects opinion, commentary, and satire on matters of public concern. It is not a statement of fact.

Viewers are encouraged to verify information independently.”

10/25/2026

STILL WAITING ON THE CROWDS
Developers have reshaped area near Arch with loft apartments

LACLEDE'S LANDING

On a Wednesday afternoon this summer, Caroline Kauffman and her co-workers sat in the shade under a tree at Laclede's Landing for lunch.

It was quiet, and the cobblestone streets were empty, apart from a few people milling about.

"It's like, what is there even to do around here?" Kauffman, 36, said. "Few places are open past 7."

Once the center of downtown St. Louis nightlife, Laclede's Landing lost its luster years ago amid competition from other entertainment hubs, fears of downtown crime and a multiyear overhaul of the Gateway Arch grounds. Being separated from downtown by Interstate 44 didn't help.

Now, the nine-block area north of the Gateway Arch grounds and the Eads Bridge is trying again. The Old Spaghetti Factory is still there. So is the wax museum. And a couple of new restaurants have arrived. But the big shift? Developers — one in particular — are turning building after building into high-ceilinged, exposed-beam loft apartments.

Matt O'Leary, executive director of Downtown Forward, one of a handful of organizations aiming to steward St. Louis' central business district, said the Landing is crucial to revitalizing the overall area.

"We believe Second Street between the Eads and MLK bridges should be one of the great retail and restaurant streets in the St. Louis region because of the quality and character of the buildings and built environment," O'Leary said in an email.

The Landing's largest property owner, local developer Advantes Group, is one of the drivers of change here. The company has invested tens of millions of dollars buying and renovating properties, betting big it could turn the Landing into a neighborhood.

It's been slow going. Many storefronts remain vacant. Signs direct tourists to defunct shops. Getting to, and parking at, the Landing continues to be problematic. And no one has quite figured out how to use the Mississippi Riverfront in a way that consistently attracts residents and visitors alike.

Still, Advantes co-owner Gretchen Minges said there is hope — the city has earmarked $15 million of Rams settlement money for riverfront improvements, for instance.

"People don't want to see it die," Minges said. "There's always a rebirth at some point."

The Landing's rise and fall

The Landing's cobblestones and warehouses were largely ignored by the public until the 1960s, when city leaders sought to complement the newly opened Gateway Arch amid a wave of urban renewal efforts nationwide.

The city flirted with the idea of bulldozing the buildings for new high-rises, but eventually decided against it: The Landing is one of the few corners of the region where the riverfront's original slope and colonial street design remain.

News articles from the era report that the Landing's name — in honor of city founder Pierre Laclede, who historians believe actually landed on St. Louis shores a little farther south at the site of the Arch — originated either with the city planning department or Jimmy Massucci, who owned a cafe at the Landing and who led the development of the Gaslight Square entertainment district near Midtown.

By the 1970s, new businesses were moving into the Landing. Then nightclubs began opening. In its heyday, it had two dozen bars and restaurants.

In the early 1990s, the city sought to double down on the Landing's popularity by building a casino. It received proposals from a handful of developers, including Donald Trump, who pitched a 1,000-room hotel with a gold-glass exterior and a 700,000-gallon aquarium and marina that would feature dolphin shows.

Eventually, the President Casino opened, then another, now known as Horseshoe, just north of the Landing.

As the 2000s kicked off, however, a list of troubles arrived: Other area entertainment districts, especially along Washington Avenue downtown, sprouted, stealing business from the Landing. The Great Recession upended development throughout the region.

Then city leaders embarked on a $380 million renovation of the Arch grounds.

The project demolished a parking garage that served the Landing, vastly reduced tourism, and blocked access to the neighborhood — for four years.

Over one 18-month stretch, seven of 14 remaining bars and restaurants closed.

Now there are just four.

'So much potential'

Advantes, the apartment developer, says it can create a new Landing, one for residents and tourists alike.

The apartments are attracting a mix of tenants, Minges said. Corporate and short-term rentals cater to temporary employees, tourists and conventiongoers.

Peper Lofts has about 50 apartments and is home to The Cobblestone, a market and coffee spot that opened in 2024 and has become the neighborhood hangout.

The casino, Wax Museum and Old Spaghetti Factory, which opened in the 1970s, still draw tourists.

A U.S. Coast Guard recruitment office opened on North Second Street last year.

"We have a little bit of everything, and they all spend money differently," Minges said.

Kimberly Mayden works at a marketing firm on the Landing. She recently stayed after work to grab a drink at The Cobblestone with her husband and attend an art gallery opening. They wanted to stay for dinner, but left after realizing how limited their options were.

"It feels like there's so much potential," said Mayden, 30.

Earlier this year, Advantes hired John Warren of Cushman & Wakefield to find businesses to lease the Landing's retail space. Minges is hoping to draw more restaurants and other businesses like nail salons, clothing boutiques, even a chiropractor.

She has her hopes on the $15 million in Rams settlement money that is slated to go to riverfront improvements.

Exact plans for that money have yet to be finalized, but Ryan McClure of Gateway Arch Park Foundation, which is helping lead the effort, said the focus will be on the area between Biddle Street to the north and Chouteau Avenue to the south. The group first will identify maintenance that needs to be addressed; it will have to work with the Army Corps of Engineers, which maintains the river, on any riverfront plans.

Potential design work could begin next year, McClure said.

At some point, the group hopes to reopen the river road, Leonor K. Sullivan Boulevard, which has been closed to cars to crack down on drag racing.

Hurdles remain

Cash for the turnaround is tight.

Revenue generated from the Landing's special taxing district has grown by just $66,000 over 10 years, to $247,689 last year — not enough to replace existing signage with QR coded maps and information for visitors, said Minges, the developer.

Advantes has hit speed bumps. Contractors have filed $775,000 in liens on Advantes properties, alleging the company has not paid for work done there. And an investor is suing for $7.8 million, accusing the company of falling behind on loan payments.

Minges said some of the work was not done properly, and the company is addressing the issues.

"We're working through them as amicably as possible," Minges said.

Even city officials sometimes hesitate at investing: This summer, the St. Louis Port Authority rejected a $29,000 contract to study conditions at porte cochere, just north of the Landing where the President Casino docked before closing in 2010.

The city's development arm, the St. Louis Development Corp., had asked the port authority to spend the money after a proposal emerged to create a public market there.

Members of the Port Authority, particularly Alderman Shane Cohn, balked, saying they were not convinced the market could draw customers to an area that already is struggling.

And not everyone's on board with Advantes' vision.

Bryan King, who owns a building at First and Morgan streets, said the Landing needs to decide whether it wants to be a tourist destination or a residential neighborhood. The latter, he said, would require many more apartments to make it a vibrant place to live that can be self sustaining.

The Landing can work, King said: It has many attributes that other neighborhoods do not, with its riverfront and Gateway Arch views, historic charm and lower rental costs for businesses.

It is up to the city to decide whether it has the appetite to make the Landing work, King said.

Resident Eli Front said he loves the neighborhood, and wants more development along the river.

"It is just beautiful there," said Front, 21, who grew up in University City. "I don't think (people) really take the time to see how beautiful the bridges, the water and the buildings are."

He and his girlfriend feel safe walking around at night, and his commute to his downtown office consists of a 10-minute walk through the Arch grounds. Whatever items The Cobblestone market does not have, Front said he can take a quick drive to three other nearby grocery stores.

He acknowledged that access is an issue; parking is expensive for friends when they stop by and getting to the Landing can be confusing because of the highway.

Still, Front said the Landing offers a lot more than what people expect.

"I think it's such a hidden gem," he said.

Steph Kukuljan 314-340-8506

JEFFERSON COUNTY VOTERS DESERVE CLARITY.This advertisement lists candidates endorsed by Laborers’ Local 110 and also pro...
10/24/2026

JEFFERSON COUNTY VOTERS DESERVE CLARITY.

This advertisement lists candidates endorsed by Laborers’ Local 110 and also prominently displays “YES ON 6.” Putting those messages together may leave readers with the impression that every candidate pictured supports Amendment 6.

The ad itself does not establish that. A union endorsing a candidate does not automatically mean that candidate endorses every ballot position the union takes.

The disclaimer identifies Laborers Union Local #110 Voluntary Political Fund as the advertiser. That tells us whose advertisement this is—but it does not tell us each candidate’s position on Amendment 6 or whether they approved this presentation.

A straightforward clarification would help:
• Does each listed candidate support or oppose Amendment 6?
• Did the candidates approve the use of their names alongside that message?
• Will Local 110 clarify that its ballot-measure position should not be attributed to every endorsed candidate?

Local 110 has the right to express its endorsements and positions. Candidates also deserve to have their actual positions represented accurately, and voters deserve to understand the distinction.

Read the ballot language, ask candidates directly, and evaluate each race and amendment separately. An endorsement advertisement should never substitute for clear answers.

BUILDING HOMES AND MAKING THE RULES: JEFFERSON COUNTY DESERVES ANSWERSWhen a home builder serves on a county council tha...
10/23/2026

BUILDING HOMES AND MAKING THE RULES: JEFFERSON COUNTY DESERVES ANSWERS

When a home builder serves on a county council that makes development decisions, residents deserve transparency about where private business interests intersect with public responsibilities.

Jefferson County identifies Tim Bennett Jr. as its District 5 council member. (jeffcomo.gov) In the questionnaire screenshot accompanying this discussion, Timothy Bennett’s occupation is listed as “Home builder,” and one of his priorities is “Lower restrictions for builders.”

The original questionnaire has not been independently verified for this article. However, the position attributed to him raises a fair question: Which restrictions would he lower, who would benefit, and what protections would remain for residents?

Construction experience can help an official understand housing costs, permitting delays and infrastructure needs. But that experience also makes disclosure of relevant business interests especially important. The screenshot alone does not establish an unlawful conflict or improper vote.

“Lower restrictions” could mean simplifying repetitive paperwork or making permit reviews more predictable. It could also mean changing requirements that protect neighboring properties and future homeowners. Residents deserve to know exactly what is proposed.

Before supporting changes, the public should receive answers to these questions:

• Which rules? Identify the specific development requirements proposed for amendment or elimination.

• What safeguards? Explain whether changes would affect stormwater controls, road construction, inspections, lot sizes, setbacks or emergency access.

• Who pays? Would developers remain responsible for necessary improvements, or would costs shift to taxpayers, homeowners and subdivision associations?

• Who benefits financially? Would any proposal affect property, projects or businesses in which the council member has a financial interest?

• How will conflicts be handled? Will relevant interests be disclosed publicly, with legal guidance on when participation or voting is restricted?

Missouri law provides an important starting point. Section 105.461 requires members of local governing bodies with a substantial personal or private interest in a pending measure to disclose that interest before acting on it. A qualifying financial-interest statement can satisfy that provision. Whether additional restrictions apply depends on the facts and applicable law. (revisor.mo.gov)

Residents should ask the county to make relevant disclosures easy to find and explain how potential conflicts are reviewed. As a matter of public accountability, proposed development changes should also include a clear explanation of their effects on infrastructure, neighboring properties and long-term maintenance costs.

Jefferson County needs housing, investment and economic opportunity. It also needs roads that hold up, drainage that works, reliable infrastructure and decisions residents can trust.

Councilman Bennett should explain precisely what “lower restrictions for builders” means—and how he would protect the public when development policy overlaps with his business interests.

That is a reasonable question for any public official, regardless of political party or profession.

ATTACHMENT-BASED REVIEW OCTOBER 23, 2026City of St. Louis FY2027 Budget ReviewSTLOUIS-MO.GOVMayor Cara Spencer
10/23/2026

ATTACHMENT-BASED REVIEW
OCTOBER 23, 2026
City of St. Louis FY2027 Budget Review

STLOUIS-MO.GOV
Mayor Cara Spencer

10/23/2026
AFTER THE STORM: WHO IS STILL WAITING?St. Louis May 16, 2025 Tornado | Consolidated Recovery, Funding and Accountability...
10/23/2026

AFTER THE STORM: WHO IS STILL WAITING?
St. Louis May 16, 2025 Tornado | Consolidated Recovery,
Funding and Accountability Review
Updated report dated October 23, 2026. Includes an analytical update and the full 24-page original 2025 source

Board Bill Number 105 In Session 2026-2027An ordinance calling and providing for the holding of an election in the City ...
10/23/2026

Board Bill Number 105 In Session 2026-2027
An ordinance calling and providing for the holding of an election in the City of St. Louis on April 6, 2027, for the purpose of submitting to the qualified voters of the City of St. Louis a proposal to require Data Center Operators to obtain a Data Center Business License and to impose a license fee upon Data Center Operators.

Ask questions of your elected officials

City police nix the idea of a TV seriesDepartment officials cite public pushbackST. LOUIS — The city's police department...
10/23/2026

City police nix the idea of a TV series
Department officials cite public pushback

ST. LOUIS — The city's police department announced Thursday it would nix a request to partner with the creator of "Law & Order" on a docuseries, citing negative public feedback to the idea.

"Our goal was to showcase St. Louis and our officers' work to reduce gun violence," said a post from the department on X. "After listening to our community's concerns, we have decided not to move forward."

The announcement came roughly 24 hours after department spokesman Mitch McCoy pitched the idea for a documentary-style reality TV series to the Board of Police Commissioners.

McCoy said the project, intended to air on the network A&E, would've followed city homicide detectives, crime technicians and officers as they worked with federal agencies to reduce gun violence.

He said it'd highlight how the department and its partners solved recent high-profile cases — like the killing of 16-year-old hockey player Colin Brown on Interstate 55 — and would bring awareness to the way that the city is investing in public safety.

"This allows us on a national level to show how we are making St. Louis safer every day," he said.

But St. Louis Mayor Cara Spencer expressed serious concerns with the plan, warning that it could tarnish the city's reputation at a time when officials have worked hard to reduce crime and make positive investments.

Further, she said in a letter, it raised concerns about the privacy of crime victims and the legal ramifications of bringing film crews onto crime scenes.

The city had previously partnered with the same production company, Lucky 8, on a live reality TV series called "Live Rescue," which featured the St. Louis Fire Department. That agreement eventually ended, however, after a federal probe into patient privacy concerns.

Other, similar projects have been canceled in other cities. In Texas, for example, a crew with the show "Live PD" filmed sheriff's deputies using stun guns on a man in custody, despite cries for help and pleas that he was sick and couldn't breathe.

The incident resulted in the Texas legislature prohibiting law enforcement agencies from contracting with reality TV productions.

Spencer, in her letter, said that was a big reason to reject the proposal.

"The city absorbs the reputational harm of a national series built around our most difficult nights, at a time when we and our civic and business community leaders are working hard every day to show progress on public safety and attract investment," Spencer wrote.

On Wednesday, the police board tabled the proposal, citing the need for further discussion. Spencer was traveling and did not attend the meeting.

On Thursday, the department announced it was nixing the project.

"We will explore other ways to share this important work while building trust with the people we serve," the department's post said. "Your voice matters, and we remain committed to working alongside you to make St. Louis safer for everyone."

Address

17209 Chesterfield Airport Road #174
Chesterfield, MO
63005

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Missourians for Ethical & Transparent Government posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Shortcuts

Share