11/19/2024
ALDOT studies proved, before construction was begun on the Northern Beltline, that it was not justified by traffic needs. Apparently, it is now admittedly in hopes of economic development. It was obvious from the beginning that the real reason for the Northern Beltline route through the countryside is to open large, vacant lands owned primarily by Drummond Coal and U.S. Steel. It is beyond responsible reasoning for Alabama’s elected officials to allocate our state’s federal highway tax allotment to a multi-billion dollar interstate highway that is not needed for traffic and will drastically impact the Black Warrior and Cahaba Rivers, two major drinking water sources.
Per the National Bridge Inventory, Alabama has identified 16,130 bridges with needed repairs. Of the total, 543 are structurally deficient. That is only a part of Alabama’s many other road and highway needs. We do not know the current projected cost of the Northern Beltline, but rest assured, it is far greater than $5.4 billion. That was the 2014 estimated cost. While the plan is to pour billions of our federal tax dollars into construction of Alabama’s major interstate boondoggle, the state’s taxpaying citizens are paying for repair of our bridges and roadways, through ATRIP-II, a program created by the Rebuild Alabama Act. It calls for a minimum of $30 million annually in state tax dollars. For 2024, $40 million was allocated. It will take quite some time to repair 16,130 bridges, not to mention all the other needed road repairs. Alabama needs the federal funds that our leaders are allocating to an unjustified highway.
A less environmentally and financially costly option for the segment of highway currently under construction would be to form an at-grade parkway along the planned route to Clay-Palmerdale Road, but deviate at that point later to Deerfoot Parkway in the City of Clay, which leads to the interstate system.
Alabama is poised to use 100 percent federal funding to build an interstate that won’t alleviate any of the state’s largest traffic gridlocks and is promoted as an economic development plan rather than a transportation necessity.