Clearfield Borough

Clearfield Borough This is the official page of the Borough of Clearfield, Clearfield County, Pennsylvania.

06/04/2026

6/4/26 Borough Council Meeting

05/28/2026

A Statement Regarding CRPD

To the Residents of Clearfield Borough:

​As you know, Borough Council has voted to terminate its agreement with Lawrence Township for the Clearfield Regional Police Commission. Council has not taken this decision lightly and has thoroughly reviewed the potential costs and problems associated with staying with the Commission, as well as the potential costs and problems associated with reestablishing its own Police Department. Whether the Borough stays with the commission or not, Borough Council understands that there will be costs associated with either choice but in the end, Borough Council believes that it is more important to have its own control over those expenses as opposed to the control of those expenses by the Regional Commission and Lawrence Township. The following sets forth some of the reasons why the Clearfield Borough Council believes it is in the Borough’s best interest to void or terminate the agreement with the Lawrence Township and reestablish its own police department.

​The Clearfield Borough Council members and the Lawrence Township Supervisors formed the Clearfield Regional Police Commission approximately 3 years ago. Unfortunately, at the time of formation, the parties made some serious financial and management miscalculations that have ultimately led to the unsustainable financial situation the Commission, and its members, the Borough of Clearfield and Lawrence Township, are currently experiencing. At the time the Commission was formed, the parties failed to recognize, ascertain or even consider the true financial impact and future cost of the decisions they were making. The cost of operating the regional police department has proven to be much greater than anticipated by the feasibility study for the formation of the Commission. Some of these issues are identified as follows:

​The original Charter Agreement between Clearfield Borough and Lawrence Township clearly states that the amount to be paid by each of the municipalities for the police department is to be approved by each of the municipalities annually. Article VIII, Section 2, of the Charter Agreement states:

​“The Commission shall prepare an annual budget which shall be submitted for consideration and approval to each of the participating municipalities not later than October 1 of the year preceding the budget year.”

​Unfortunately, the Commission has failed to abide by this provision and has forced annual budget amounts on the Borough that have not been approved by Borough Council as provided in the charter agreement. Borough Council is certainly at fault for not dealing with this critical financial issue in a more forceful manner at an earlier date.

​For fiscal year 2023, the Borough approved a police budget of $1,039,523, and the Commission approved a police budget of $1,394,265 for the Borough. Based on the study for the regional police commission, the Borough anticipated that the startup costs of the Police Department would be higher in its first year of operation and in subsequent years the Borough’s budgeted share would be closer to $1 million per year. The Borough used reserves to pay the difference of $354,742.

For fiscal year 2024, the Borough approved a police budget of $1,015,822, and the Commission approved a police budget of $1,200,000 for the Borough. The Borough used all of its remaining cash reserves to pay the difference of $184,178.

For fiscal year 2025, the Borough approved a police budget of $1,000,000, and the Commission approved a police budget of $1,200,000 for the Borough, even though there were no remaining cash reserves and insufficient tax revenues for fiscal year 2025. When the new Borough Manager was hired in August of 2025, the $200,000 shortfall in the unapproved Commission police budget became a critical issue for Council. The Commission was also asking for an additional $50,000 to cover increased costs, for a total of $250,000 for the remaining share of the Borough’s unapproved obligation for 2025 regional police operations. Ultimately, the Borough requested that Lawrence Township loan the Borough the $250,000 avoid laying off a large number of police officers in November and December of 2025. This budget shortfall caused a deficit of $250,000 of the Borough’s budget for 2025 and has been carried over into fiscal year 2026.

For fiscal year 2026, the Commission requested a budget of $1,489,959 and the Borough anticipated a budget of $1 million for its share of the 2026 Commission police budget. If Council had agreed with the highly unreasonable budget request of the Commission for the 2026 fiscal budget, it would have resulted in a 9 mill tax increase for the Clearfield Borough citizens in addition to the actual tax millage increase necessary to pay the $250,000 loan to cover the fiscal 2025 police budget shortfall. Essentially, the Borough citizens were facing a $750,000 budget shortfall for 2026, i.e. $500,000 to pay the regional commission increased budget request and $250,000 to pay the budget shortfall from 2025. When the Borough representatives met with the Commission concerning the difference in the amount they were requesting verses the amount of the Borough was willing to budget, the Commission and the Lawrence Township Supervisors steadfastly responded that the proposed police budget could not be reduced, that none of the police officers could be laid off, and that part time officers could not be used by the police department to reduce costs.

The Commission, primarily the Lawrence Township members of the Commission, and the solicitor for the Commission, also advised the Borough that the Commission had the right to approve the Borough’s share of the police budget without the approval of the eight member Borough Council. This assertion was obviously contrary to law and contrary to the clear language of the Charter Agreement which states that the Commission budget will be submitted to the Borough for its “consideration and approval”. The Commission’s solicitor and the Lawrence Township Supervisors were unwavering in their assertion that the Commission didn’t need the approval of Borough Council determine the Borough’s share of the police budget. Obviously, this was unacceptable to the Borough Council and ultimately resulted in Council’s efforts to dissolve or void the Clearfield Regional Police Charter Agreement.

Surprisingly, as soon as the Borough voted to void the Charter agreement, the Commission found a way to reduce costs and approached the Borough with a lower budget request. Considering the way the police commission and the Lawrence Township Supervisors were managing the Police Department, and the failure of either to recognize the Borough’s budget realities, the Council was unwilling to continue to be a part of the regional police commission. At this point, it was clear to Council that neither the Regional Commission nor the Lawrence Township Supervisors could be trusted to negotiate in good faith with the Borough over the regional police budget.

In addition to the foregoing, Council also believed that the high costs of maintaining the police department were due to significant mistakes that were made by the Township Supervisors and Borough Council members when the regional police commission was formed. A contributing factor to the excessive expenditures is due to the collective bargaining agreement that was entered into with the police officers when the commission was formed. The collective bargaining agreement (CBA) with the police union contained many expensive benefits that one would not expect in an initial CBA. These benefits include full health insurance benefits for the officer and his family, full health insurance benefits for a retiring officer for life, $1000 per year per officer to cover any deductible or co-payments for medical expenses, eye and dental insurance, retirement pension, officers and directors insurance and personal liability insurance, all of which are paid in full by the commission without any contribution from the officers.

The Commission also bargained away extremely important management rights over the police department in the CBA. The CBA included a provision that requires the Commission to employ at least 25 full-time officers at all times, and these officers are guaranteed 40 hours of pay per week. The CBA also included a provision that mandates that at least 5 police officers are to be scheduled for every shift, 24/7, 365 days per year. Even though this type of provision in a collective bargaining agreement is not enforceable against management, the Department was managed by union employees so there is never an effort to reduce the number of officers on duty and reduce labor costs for the regional Police Department.
To make matters worse, the Police Department and its financial operations are managed by union employees. Currently, the Chief of Police has retired and the operations and financial management of the Police Department are handled, and probably have always been handled, by employees who are members of the Union. There is no nonunion management of the Clearfield Regional Police Department. It is believed that this has resulted in excessive overtime expenses for the officers and very little effort was made over the three year existence of the regional police department to schedule the officers in a manner that would reduce overtime and the costs of police operations. Even with 25 full time officers and 5 officers per shift, the police department has incurred in excess of $300,000 in overtime pay in fiscal year 2025.

The Borough is audited annually. The Clearfield Regional Police Commission has never been audited. They say they can’t afford an audit even though they can incur excessive overtime expenses and have failed to lay off any officers since the first of the year even though their budget has been drastically reduced. The Commission has stated that they have laid off four officers. This is not true. They have reduced the officers to one 12 hours shift per week but continue to pay all four officers full benefits. The Borough has requested payroll records from the Commission, but on the advice of their solicitor, they are refusing to comply with the request.

This issues between Council and the CRPD have never been about the services provided by the individual police officers to the Borough of Clearfield. The Police officers can’t be blamed for excepting the lucrative CBA offered to them by the Township and Borough. The actions of the Borough to terminate the regional police commission only has to do with protecting the financial viability of the Borough and protecting the Borough citizens from having their tax rates determined by the members of the Clearfield Regional Police Commission. Also, there is no indication that the Commission has revised its budget since the Court limited the monthly amount the Borough is paying to the Commission for its share of the regional police expenses. It does not appear that the Commission’s financial management has adequate control of its expenditures and is unwilling or unable to make the appropriate management decisions to cut excessive expenses and bring the officers’ overtime hours under control.

The actions of the Police Commission and the Lawrence Township Supervisors have really left the Borough no other choice but to do what it can to dissolve the regional Police Department and form its own Police Department. The Borough is in the process of reestablishing its Police Department and will ultimately result in the hiring of a new Chief of police as well as one or two police officers initially to handle the matters related to the dissolution of the regional Police Department.

James D. Dennison, Clearfield Borough Solicitor

05/28/2026

Statement regarding recent threats against Clearfield Borough Council:

Over the past 8 months, even before the issues concerning the Clearfield Regional Police Department arose, Clearfield Borough staff, Borough Council members and other Borough officials have been receiving numerous messages from an individual that have the clear intent of harassing the recipient and influencing the manner in which they vote on various issues that come before Council. When Clearfield Borough Council decided to terminate its regional police agreement with Lawrence Township, the messages from the perpetrator increased in frequency and intensity. The perpetrator then began working closely with the Clearfield Regional Police Department and the Clearfield County District Attorney Ryan Sayers in an effort to halt the intended actions of Clearfield Borough Council to dissolve the department because she personally did not agree with the Council’s decision.

The messages from the perpetrator became increasingly disturbing and threatening to the extent that the messages were reported to the State Police for action. However, it is believed that the efforts by the State police to prosecute the perpetrator were quashed by District Attorney Sayers. Sayers did not contact any of the victims to discuss their situation or his reasons for not letting the state police proceed with charges against the individual. The victims were ignored. It is believed that the perpetrator is being protected because she is promoting Sayers’ agenda to preserve the Clearfield Regional Police Department instead of protecting the Borough officials, their families and their employers from her harassing and intimidating messages and interactions.

When it became apparent that District Attorney Sayers strongly opposed the intended dissolution of the regional police department, Council attempted to meet with him to discuss the Borough’s reasons for leaving the regional police. However, Sayers refused to meet with the Borough Council and, instead, sided with the Lawrence Township Supervisors and the Clearfield Regional Police Departmernt. Instead of remaining neutral and endeavoring to help resolve the issues, Sayers took an active role opposing the Borough Council. He participated in active demonstrations organized by the individual who was harassing the Borough officials, spoke at meetings against the Borough’s intended actions and thanked the harassing perpetrator for her actions in favor of preserving the regional police. The Lawrence Township Supervisors also thanked her for her work at the last Township meeting.

The Borough Council has tried to ignore these messages, knowing the District Attorney was unwilling to take any action to stop her behavior. Unfortunately, as the Borough and Township move closer to actual dissolution of the regional police force, the perpetrator has increased her verbal attacks on Borough officials as she realized the Borough Council was not changing their position despite her desperate efforts. These attacks by the perpetrator increased in intensity to the point where many became concerned for their safety due to her perceived irrational behavior. Recently, she made actual threats of physical violence against a borough official which clearly crossed the line beyond protected speech, as have many of her messages to the Borough personnel. It appears the perpetrator believes that she is untouchable because she is working with the District Attorney, the Clearfield Regional Police Department, and the Lawrence Township Supervisors. This is not protected speech, it is harassment,

In fact, when the most recent messages resulted in the Council meeting cancellation by the Borough, the perpetrator herself actually contacted the Clearfield Regional Police Department and showed them copies of her messages. The police then showed them to District Attorney Sayers who reviewed the messages and decided they were not actionable as a threat or harassment. At no time did Sayers contact the victims or the Borough officials to find out the victims’ side of the story.

DA Sayers also referred to one of the victims as a “fag”. Again, your District Attorney and the regional police have ignored the victims.

The Borough does not believe that this one particular message attached to this letter constitutes a threat, but it unquestionably is harassment. Also, the perceived threat to the Borough was the culmination of many threatening, hate filled, harassing, emboldened communications coupled with the intensity of the perpetrator’s behavior and her past threats of physical harm that caused law enforcement to have a concern about the safety of Council and recommended the cancellation of the meeting. She is now claiming on her page that none of this is true. The following attached message is one of her latest messages sent to a council member and sent to his family member via a separate message last week:

https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/wb7c94ibc88ngmwiuc7fo/HarassmentMessage.docx?rlkey=gn98tr66xtlgkcw24pvzioum6&dl=0

Given the recent events which clearly call into question the impartiality of District Attorney Sayers and the Regional Police, it is necessary that these matters be referred to the Pennsylvania Attorney General‘s office and the Pennsylvania State Police for action to protect the Borough officials from ongoing harassment and threats to their safety. The District Attorney and the Clearfield regional police should have stopped the harassment and unlawful actions long before it reached the current level of hostility.

James D. Dennison, Clearfield Borough Solicitor

05/27/2026

May 27, 2026 Council Meeting Part 2

05/27/2026

May 27, 2026 Council Meeting

05/22/2026

The Clearfield Borough Council Meeting from Thursday, May 21, 2026 has been rescheduled to
Wednesday, May 27, 2026 at 5 P.M.

05/21/2026

The Council meeting scheduled for Thursday, May 21, 2026, at 5:00 PM has been canceled due to multiple ongoing threats directed at elected officials, Borough staff, and their families. The safety and well-being of everyone involved remains our top priority.

In addition, Borough offices will be closed to the public today (5/21) and tomorrow (5/22). Residents needing assistance may call (814) 765-7817.

Additional information regarding future meetings will be shared when appropriate.

05/20/2026

Clearfield Borough Council will meet May 21 at 5pm. The agenda is found here:

05/08/2026

Public Safety Announcement: E-Bike SafetyAs the popularity of e-bikes continues to grow in our community, the York County Regional Police Department wants to remind riders of the importance of safety on our roads.

Address

6 S Front Street
Clearfield, PA
16830

Opening Hours

Monday 8am - 4:30pm
Tuesday 8am - 4:30pm
Wednesday 8am - 4:30pm
Thursday 8am - 4:30pm
Friday 8am - 4:30pm

Telephone

+18147657817

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Clearfield Borough posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Share