07/31/2026
๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐
๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐โ๐ ๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐โ๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐?
Earlier this year, we began building a master list of Alabamaโs missing persons so no one would be overlooked and cases could be more easily compared with unidentified remains.
On July 15, while preparing for an unrelated project, I checked the two primary databases we use. ALEA listed 222 missing persons. NamUs listed 296. That was already a difference of 74 names.
At that point, I had not yet received the list Kylie had been compiling. After months of comparing NamUs, ALEA, and our own database, removing duplicates, and ensuring each person appeared only once, her list contained 342 names.
Over the weekend, Amber with Secrets True Crime Podcast and I reviewed it again. Her additional research uncovered more cases that also needed to be included.
Today, our working list stands at 356 Alabama missing persons.
That is 134 more than ALEA listed on July 15 and 60 more than NamUs.
And we are almost certain we still do not have everyone.
This is not about blaming an agency or deciding which database is โright.โ It is about recognizing that no single source currently gives us the full picture.
A search can only be as complete as the list behind it. When someone is absent from that list, they may also be left out of the inquiry, comparison, or review that could lead to answers.
356 is not the end of this project. It is proof of why the project matters.
๐๐ ๐ฐ๐ ๐๐๐ง๐ง๐จ๐ญ ๐๐ ๐ซ๐๐ ๐จ๐ง ๐ก๐จ๐ฐ ๐ฆ๐๐ง๐ฒ ๐ฉ๐๐จ๐ฉ๐ฅ๐ ๐๐ซ๐ ๐ฆ๐ข๐ฌ๐ฌ๐ข๐ง๐ , ๐ก๐จ๐ฐ ๐๐๐ง ๐ฐ๐ ๐๐ ๐๐๐ซ๐ญ๐๐ข๐ง ๐๐ฏ๐๐ซ๐ฒ ๐จ๐ง๐ ๐จ๐ ๐ญ๐ก๐๐ฆ ๐ก๐๐ฌ ๐ญ๐ก๐ ๐จ๐ฉ๐ฉ๐จ๐ซ๐ญ๐ฎ๐ง๐ข๐ญ๐ฒ ๐ญ๐จ ๐๐ ๐๐จ๐ฎ๐ง๐?