08/28/2026
Country Club District Service Company
Vs.
Village of Edina
Last month we gave a rundown of the initial case and decision on the case between the Country Club District and the Village of Edina, filed in 1939 and decided in favor of the district in 1940. The suit claimed the district was owed money from Edina for the use of fire hydrants and sewers in two areas of the neighborhood.
In this 1941 appellant’s brief, filed before the Minnesota Supreme Court, Clarence Holten, Village Attorney for Edina notes the errors that he believed were made in the trial.
Edina disputed the claims on the hydrants and sewers saying that the trial judge should have taken the previous evidence into account but didn’t. The village also said the court committed an error in not resolving the ownership issue by disregarding Edina’s evidence.
The final error claimed was that St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Co. should not have allowed as an intervenor and that the village was not allowed to question their mortgage status and other issues.
Next month, the final decision.