05/21/2025
5/15 Regular Meeting Notes-
Minutes (Attached) Approval: Joyce Motioned, Anthony Second, All Yes
Electric Issue: Southern Elementary is reporting some voltage issues with their HVAC, though EPP Electric and Richard both suspect the issue regarding voltage is on the school's end and may need to find a way to step it down. However, they did note that one transformer located behind the school is leaking, and it should be replaced. It still operates, though it's a question as to when, not if, it fails. A cost will be put together on replacing that single transformer. Suggestions were made to put all 3 transformers underground but I believe that's a bigger bite than the city wants to take right now if only 1 needs replaced and they are otherwise operational.
Committee Reports:
Public Works Committee-
3 Topics were covered, Utility Rates, Street Needs, and Garbage. For Utility Rates, we discussed the need to adopt a rate schedule similar to that of Butler and Paris which charges Residential customers OUTSIDE city limits more, as well as commercial users. Attached a copy of butler's ordinance revised Aug 2023 as an EXAMPLE. We have not began to discuss any numbers or figures. My goal is to avoid a residential within city utility (water/sewer/electric) at least for the next few years but offsetting it with moving to a model that works like other cities, first. Ramona is going to work on getting a breakdown of usage based on at least residential/commercial to help us then figure out possible numbers. When I know more I will relay it to you, as always. Just know that if you are a in-city resident, I will fight to keep your utility bill as low as possible. The simple truth is there's a lot of "robbing Peter to pay Paul" going on as Sebastian pointed out during his term, and we are going to need to get real serious and have some tough conversations going forward if we want to right the ship.
As for street needs- A few streets that does not need any sewer work and thus are in a good position to get repaved are W Shelby, Silver, Dickerson, and Woodson. Of the 4, W Shelby is easily the most traveled road, and because of which, in terrible shape from Wyatt's to the tracks. We are working on getting our Road Aid money from the county and W Shelby is likely going to be the top of the list to be repaired. We have, however, put out bids for repaving (and possibly milling) several of these streets. We will see what the bids come back as, and the road aid amount is that is given to us and then fix as many streets as we can with said money.
Finally the Garbage- at $13/mo it's no surprise that the price doesn't even cost the labor to pick up garbage. The garbage is definitely a service that has to end up being subsidized from other utilities, and thus causing a burden on other utilities and causing improvements to be delayed. Garbage would very well likely see one of two things happen: Either a rate increase, or being outsourced to Rumpke. Before we can even start to entertain either idea, Sabrina is going to get in touch with Rumpke as to a cost to pick up the city. We will then break that down and determine if increasing the rate to make garbage 'profitable' for the city is the cheaper AND better route or contracting with Rumpke. The City's main 'issue' with garbage is it is the biggest workman's comp claim source. The reason we have so many ordinances and rules around garbage is to reduce the workman's comp claims. I say you can get workman's comp claims to 0 for garbage if you don't pick up garbage ;) With that being said if the number comes really close, let's say a few dollars difference per month, where Rumpke is still a little more expensive, I think the total reduction in workman's comp claims and the gain in service to the city by the fact that Rumpke is less picky about picking up garbage, the cost difference is acceptable. Important note: This will NOT get rid of the yearly leaf pickup service that happens in the fall.
Finance Committee- Looked at Preliminary Budget for 25-26 FY. Discussion of Employee Benefits. Making sure Allowances are aligned closely. (That's what my notes said based on their report out, I'm not on that Committee. Councilman Stephen Gales Jr. is so perhaps he can fill us in on the comments).
Joyce & Stephen swapped places on the Ordinance/Safety Committee. Stephen, having a background on Fire, is a natural fit for the Safety Committee. Ordinance and Safety Committees meet on the First Thursday of the Month, 6PM Before the full council meeting.
We then went into a closed session to Interview one of the 3 candidates for City Attorney. No other actions were taken at this meeting, so I will use this as a segue into the RFQs and interviews for City Attorney.
All in all, the 3 candidates (two were pairs of two attorneys) were all very strong candidates. It primarily came down to rates. Steve Doan was fine with an all inclusive, flat fee retainer, the same as Brandon. $2500/month. This is most advantageous for the city at the moment as we need to financial stability and predictability. Voss and Otis suggested a Hourly Rate and Eviston and Smith was unsure of the rates but when we gave them context as to what we had paid the past attorney, they didn't seem to bite as to wanting to do the same thing. Steve Doan has had experience representing several cities in N KY. He also served on Erlanger's City Council in 2021-2022. Steve was a very personable guy and reassured us that he would be here to help us, all of us. I will attach his RFQ and Resume. One thing I know that may catch some of your eyes: He was one employed at Gatlin Voelker, which is the law firm that our previous attorney is a partner. Please know that he primarily worked under Jack Gatlin, not Brandon. Also, he left the firm because of disagreements on how some things were done there. So with that being said, I do not think we are going to have any problems with Steve. We did suggest that he keeps his time noted on what he does for the city, that way in 2 years when it comes time to re-bid, if he wants to rebid at a higher rate or switch to hourly, he has the data to back up his request. At that time, depending on how the 2026 election goes, it could be with a new Mayor or Council, which is exactly why we're wanting to go with a 2 year contract cycle. The vote to have Steve Doan as attorney happened at the special meeting this past Monday. The vote was unanimous.
Lastly, though not related to a council meeting- I've been having some people notify me about 'whispers' regarding the hydrants. Please know that I've pestered both Luke and Sabrina about the non-working hydrants since I took office. Also please know that one has been replaced in front of Southern just last week, so that knocks one off the list. Sabrina is first targeting all the ones that we can replace ourselves (the 'cold tap' ones with a valve). I can't explain the inaction of repairs of previous administrations but I can tell you Sabrina is not playing around.
EDIT: I misspoke, the one in front of Southern has not been replaced yet. It was the one at 919 Main St. I misunderstood as to what southern had to do with it but found out it's because this one on Main St is on the main line from the reservoir which southern is down stream of. The concern was if something went wrong and southern lost water pressure they would have to shut down the entire school system.
The irony of it all is I've had the information as to the which hydrants are bad since November of last year in an album on this page. No one needs to go out wasting time searching for dead hydrants. Instead, search my page. I'm willing to bet most questions that I *do* know the answer to would be answered in great detail, with supporting documents.
https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=122173271804171016&set=a.122173271714171016
Next Meeting: Regular Meeting 7PM June 5th. Ordinance and Safety Committee Meetings the same day at 6PM.
P.S. for common questions, statements, and accusations I have seen recently:
No, the school sale is not finished, but that is going to be the first task of the new attorney, to get the purchase contract drawn up to finish the sale.
Yes, we are allowed to do that with an 'appointed' mayor.
No, we are not legally required to have a city attorney to run a council meeting.
No, we are not required, nor are we even allowed, to run an ad-hoc election outside of the state election cycle. We ARE required to fill the open Mayor/Council seat within 30 days of it being vacated by appointment.
No, public participation is not required in open meetings, it's not even protected per KRS. Open Meetings act only gives the right to SEE and HEAR what happens at a meeting, there is no right to speak or address the government entity.
Yes, we did appoint a "truck driver" to council, and he has been doing very well in his new role. We chose the best person who applied for the position through the correct channels and showed up for the interview which was all publicly announced.
No, I was not 'bribed' to sell the school to Trinity, nor did it have anything to do with my Step Son. I already painstakingly went over my reasoning of what happened that meeting and how I made my decision in those meeting notes. Please read those.
No, I was never on the school board, EVER. (Maybe you are thinking of Anthony Strong?) And I was not on council prior to October 2024.
No, I was not involved with the removal of Sebastian- as stated above I wasnt even on council at the time. In fact I was a citizen against the removal when it happened and even wrote him a letter of support.
No, The city did not own the old middle school at all before the purchase in 2023, thus we did not "buy back" the building. The board of Ed sold it in 2018 I believe (don't quote me on that) and then we bought it in 2023, and now sold it again. I had NOTHING to do with the original sale from the BoE, nor the purchase by the city. In fact, similar to above, I was originally on favor of the purchase as a citizen.
If you are going to refute ANY of these PLEASE provide supporting documents and not just copy/paste Chat GPT response or a 'nuh-uh', or I will not waste my time with a response.
~Anthony