Vote No on Falmouth 1

Vote No on Falmouth 1 Protect Falmouth's Pesticide Ordinance! It safeguards our children, pets, and pollinators from harmful chemicals. Let's stand for a safer community!

Voting NO on Falmouth Article 1 keeps these vital protections while allowing sensible exemptions.

11/03/2025

(An important reminder that I received this morning)

Vote NO on Article 1 for a Healthier Casco Bay

Tomorrow, Falmouth voters will decide whether to keep or repeal the town’s pesticide and fertilizer ordinance — the law that protects local streams, ponds, and Casco Bay from harmful chemical runoff.

Vote NO on Article 1 to keep these protections in place for your family, your pets, your neighborhood, and Casco Bay.

The evidence is in:

• Pesticides have been found in Falmouth’s stormwater that can harm marine life

• Fertilizers contribute to algal blooms, which can smoother clam flats. A study commissioned by Falmouth found that “all sites exceeded EPA-recommended thresholds” for phosphorus and nitrogen.

State and local experts agree: reducing chemical use is key to protecting our waters. Maine Audubon is also recommending Falmouth Vote No on 1.

When and where to vote

Election Day: Tuesday, November 4, 2025
Polls open: 7 a.m.–8 p.m. at Falmouth High School Gym, 74 Woodville Road
Absentee voting: Ballots must be received by 8 p.m. on November 4.
➜ Register to vote

Let’s keep Falmouth’s waters healthy for generations to come.

Warmly,
Friends of Casco Bay

Many residents are making their own signs asking the community to Vote No on Falmouth 1!
10/22/2025

Many residents are making their own signs asking the community to Vote No on Falmouth 1!

Falmouth is facing a real watershed moment | Opinionpressherald.com/2025/10/20/falmouth-is-facing-a-literal-watershed-mo...
10/22/2025

Falmouth is facing a real watershed moment | Opinion
pressherald.com/2025/10/20/falmouth-is-facing-a-literal-watershed-moment-opinion

Susan Hayhurst, MS, DVM, a resident of Falmouth, is staff veterinarian at the Animal Refuge League of Greater Portland.

We are facing a watershed moment, literally and figuratively, in Falmouth and Greater Portland. After the Falmouth Town Council passed an ordinance to limit pesticide and fertilizer use, the ordinance faced pushback; a referendum to repeal it will be on the ballot in Falmouth this fall.

It’s important for our communities, our pets and our waterways to keep the pesticide and fertilizer restrictions in place (and vote “No” on Article 1). In 1962, Rachel Carson published “Silent Spring,” a call to action to save bird populations, which were being devastated by a pesticide that left egg shells weak. She called for us to stop using DDT, and today, we hear birdsong and see bald eagles nesting.

Now, we are again being asked a similar question: do we want our children and grandchildren to see monarchs and other butterflies in the future? I spoke with a monarch researcher last spring, and he told me that — despite worrisome numbers facing monarch
1/2 populations — he firmly believes that they will be resilient and not go extinct but if, and only if, we do not insist on continuing to spread the chemicals that we know are devastating
pollinators.

Just like our predecessors made the hard decision to ban DDT and preserve birdsong for our generation, we now face the decision of whether to leave future generations a legacy of
butterflies and other pollinators in their future.

The question also affects our health and our pets’ health. In Falmouth and Greater Portland, our coastlines are the gems of our communities. We like to swim, fish, collect clams and eat
shore to table seafood at local establishments. Limiting herbicides and pesticides in our coastal communities and the watersheds that flow to them helps keep these shorelines
healthy and safe for our families (and the organisms that live here, too).

I am a veterinarian and a former marine biologist who has studied water quality and its impacts on living things (as a proud graduate of UMaine’s marine science graduate
program). I know that what we put in our yards makes its way to our pets, our waterways, our coastlines and ultimately our bodies and our children’s bodies.

These chemicals persist in the environment and make their way up the food chain to us. And they affect our pets. There are studies that show this, and also show that our pets are likely
sentinels for our own health and the impacts these chemicals have on us.

When I recently asked colleagues in veterinary medicine, they agreed that limitations on pesticides and fertilizers are important to protect our pets (and ultimately ourselves — since
we are exposed to the same things — a “One Health” concept.)
We have such beautiful gardens here in southern Maine. I love to see the landscaping in my neighbors’ yards. Naturally, we like what we are used to and what our parents and
grandparents taught us. But sometimes, when we have new data and information about the risks, it’s time to do the hard thing and make a change.

Although Rachel Carson and her writings faced pushback and controversy, her call to action prevailed and the banning of DDT is why we hear birdsong today. Our amazing garden
centers can educate us about how to change, and sell alternatives that can continue to keep
our yards beautiful.

It’s natural to want beautiful and vibrant yards and flowers, but I truly believe we can still do that with these changes. It’s not easy, but we can adapt. Doing so — being brave and making this change — is a legacy we can give to our pets, our children and our grandchildren.

The Portland Press Herald

It’s important for our communities, our pets and our waterways to keep Falmouth’s pesticide and fertilizer restrictions in place.

We must limit the harmful effects of pesticides inFalmouth | Letterpressherald.com/2025/10/18/we-must-limit-the-harmful-...
10/20/2025

We must limit the harmful effects of pesticides in
Falmouth | Letter
pressherald.com/2025/10/18/we-must-limit-the-harmful-effects-of-pesticides-in-falmouth-letter

A campaign based on merit doesn’t need to trick people. Which leads me to wonder, is the “Yes” on Falmouth Article 1 campaign deliberately misleading or ignorant of pesticides?

Yes on 1 asserts Falmouth’s existing common-sense pesticide ordinance is “unfair” and “illogical.” False. It is endorsed by Maine Audubon, Cumberland County Soil and Water Conservation District and Friends of Casco Bay. Similar ordinances have been approved in other coastal towns.

“Yes” on Article 1 urges Falmouth residents to “Save our Trees.” It says we must “let our ash become infested and die.” False. Falmouth’s ordinance doesn’t prohibit pesticides targeted
against the emerald ash borer.

What that campaign ignores is unrestricted use of pesticides contaminates our waterways, kills pollinators, puts pets at risk for cancer and affects our health.

Let’s be leaders against climate change by limiting the harmful effects of pesticides. Vote
“No” on Falmouth Article 1.

London Leland
Falmouth
© 2025 The Portland Press Herald
10/18/25

A campaign based on merit doesn’t need to trick people. Which leads me to wonder, is the “Yes” on Falmouth Article 1 campaign deliberately misleading or ignorant of pesticides? Yes on 1…

The science is clear, pesticides are bad for our pets, kids, adults and water
10/16/2025

The science is clear, pesticides are bad for our pets, kids, adults and water

Another concerning study on the impacts on pets:
10/01/2025

Another concerning study on the impacts on pets:

Alarming research links canine malignant lymphoma (CML) with lawn pesticides, and has may have implications to the impact of chemicals on humans as well.

All of the Falmouth veterinarians we spoke with were very concerned about the effects of pesticides on dogs and cats. He...
09/28/2025

All of the Falmouth veterinarians we spoke with were very concerned about the effects of pesticides on dogs and cats. Here is an eye opening article from the American Pet Cancer Foundation:

Learn how pesticides can affect your pet's health and increase cancer risk. Discover prevention tips to protect your pets from harmful chemicals.

09/28/2025

The Town shared this fact sheet with Falmouth residents:

09/28/2025

There is a lot of misinformation about what the ordinance allows and restricts. Here is the Town's Q&A sheet:

Address

PO Box 6051
Falmouth, ME
04105

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Vote No on Falmouth 1 posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Share