06/05/2026
Two weeks ago, we brought you the story of Pvt. Richard Roe, a young soldier from Co. M, 9th Cavalry. After an altercation between himself and his fellow soldiers over an alleged stolen carbine, Pvt. Roe deserted his company but was apprehended by a search party near Fredericksburg in April 1873. In an appeal to Army leadership, Roe touted his record as a blacksmith in the company, and he alleged mistreatment during his confinement, and even claimed that he’d requested transfer to a different company.
Today, we bring you a pointed response to Roe’s allegations from the 1st lieutenant of his company. Upon receiving Roe’s letter, 1st Lt. Byron Dawson, Co. M, 9th Cavalry, wrote that, “In reply I would respectfully state, I have not spoke one word to pvt. Rowe since he was returned to this Post as a Prisoner.” Lt. Dawson stated bluntly the facts of the case writing, “He deserted while on Post taking with him, one carbine and accoutrements, one horse and full set of horse equipments.”
Concerning Roe’s allegations of mistreatment, Dawson replied, “The prisoner never complained to me about harsh treatment by General McCook, and I am not aware, that he is treated worse than other men under similar circumstances.” Lt. Dawson summarily dismissed Roe’s blacksmithing, writing that, “this man was acting as Blacksmith for a few days but I had to relieve him because he was worthless.” Dawson condemned Pvt. Roe himself saying of him that, “…since this man has been in the company I have always considered him a lyer and a thief and worthless as a soldier. Finally, he dismissed Roe’s claims of abuse by his 1st sergeant, explaining that, “I think this is a made up story of his, and as for him applying to me to be transferred to another Co., he never made an application to me that I remember of.”
Below: Officers’ Quarters No.8, part of Lt.’s Row. It’s probable that Lt. Dawson in this row of officers’ quarters in the 1870s | Fort McKavett collection